Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Elizabeth Farr
- Postcode verified
RG41 5BB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,099
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Jane Barlow Bearwood Primary School Sindlesham Wokingham Berkshire RG41 5BB
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 24 March 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
sharpen the action plan so it is clear: when actions will take place who will lead on each action who will monitor the effectiveness of each action how success will be measured against outcomes achieved by pupils
p.1
School
ensure that teachers’ assessments of pupils’ work are accurate arrange a full review of governance. Tribal Kings Orchard 1 Queens Street Bristol, BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5269 Email : klara.davies@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, I met with you, other senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body, and a representative from Wokingham local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school’s action plan. In addition, I scrutinised other school documents, including records of leaders’ monitoring of teaching and learning. The single central record was checked. I joined you on a tour of the school and visited every class, taking the opportunity to look at pupils’ work.
p.2
Context
Since the previous inspection, there have been several changes to staffing. Three class teachers who had been absent have now returned, two on a part-time basis and one full-time. A member of staff has resigned as leader for early years but retains the post of teacher with responsibility for pupils with special educational needs. From April, a different senior leader will become the school’s leader for early years. A teacher with responsibility for a class of Year 5 and 6 pupils is absent. Senior leaders are sharing teaching responsibilities for this class.
p.2
Main findings
You and the school’s leaders have taken on board the recommendations from the previous inspection report. You accept the findings and are using them to galvanise and refocus senior leaders’ efforts. Everyone shares your commitment to ‘becoming a good school’ once again. There is renewed vigour and determination to improve the school.
p.2
Main findings
You are intent on gathering wider evidence on a more regular basis to raise standards. Information about how well pupils are learning is gathered more frequently. Meetings to discuss pupils’ progress with teachers take place routinely. Senior leaders have helpfully modelled discussions to ensure that teachers are clear what is expected. As a result, teachers’ accountability for how well pupils are learning is strengthening appropriately. Teachers identify more readily pupils in their classes who are not making the progress expected. They plan useful actions to support these pupils’ learning more effectively. This is beginning to help pupils make the progress they are capable of. However, leaders now need to make sure that the information they gather is accurate.
p.2
Main findings
Well-judged changes to the way the curriculum is organised and delivered are contributing well to improving standards. For example, leaders acknowledge that altering the timing of numeracy sessions in early years’ classes is ensuring children are more responsive to new learning. More children are developing the skills and knowledge that are typical for their age than in the past. Teachers’ planning has strengthened and focuses on helping pupils to acquire new skills. You have ensured that classroom displays are more informative and helpful for pupils. This sharper focus on learning is contributing well to improving pupils’ levels of attainment. School information shows that pupils are making greater progress than in the past and are beginning to catch up. More pupils are achieving the levels they are capable of. For example, standards in phonics have continued to rise and more Year 1 pupils are working at the standard expected for their age.
p.2
Main findings
Since the last inspection, leaders have sensibly re-written the action plan to ensure that actions are appropriate to the areas requiring improvement. While the plan describes actions in depth, it is not clear enough what the intended impact is on outcomes for pupils. This makes it difficult to check that actions are making the difference where it matters. Also, it is unclear who is leading certain aspects and when actions will take place. Refining the plan will ensure leaders and governors are able to evaluate, more clearly, the impact of actions on improving teaching and learning.
p.3
Main findings
Governors have recently revised their roles and responsibilities, adjusting their committee structure to align more closely with the school’s improvement priorities. The newly-formed data committee is offering greater challenge to school leaders about how well pupils are learning. Governors are committed to monitoring the school’s improvement more closely and plan to gather more information first-hand.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
Following the previous inspection, the local authority promptly increased its support for school leaders, initially visiting the school on a weekly basis. These visits have been particularly useful and have included helpful sessions to support teachers in effective lesson planning. Also, an advisor has conducted helpful lesson observations alongside senior leaders. The school has benefitted from regular visits from a consultant for early years and is part of an ‘Excellence Working Group’.
p.3
External support
A school improvement board, which includes local authority representatives, the headteacher and Chair of the Governing Body, have met once to discuss how well pupils are learning. This is welcome but would be more useful if discussion points were agreed in advance. This would allow leaders to present information more fully and members to offer challenge that is more helpful.
p.3
External support
The local authority has brokered useful support for governors. The Chair of the Governing Body has particularly benefited from support from a National Leader of Governance. A date for an external review of governance is yet to be agreed. This remains a key priority so that governors can use the findings to develop their expertise further.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Wokingham.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion