Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Park Blue Homes Limited in Durham

Inspected — · published 29 Apr 2015 · URN SC453372

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nicholas Murphy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Nicholas Murphy

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • URN verified

    SC453372

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−45Criticalmore positive than 11% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedsecure
Criticismconcernsdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings49w0
  • What needs to improve258w−45

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
304
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%What needs to improve 26%About the inspection 69%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC453372 Inspector Nicholas Murphy Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Registered manager Gary Robert Snaith Date of last inspection 11/06/2014 2 of 6 Inspection date 25/03/2015

p.1

Previous inspection good Enforcement action since last inspection there has been no enforcement action since the last inspection

p.2

This inspection

This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .

p.2

This inspection

Outcomes for young people are excellent. Most have made outstanding progress at school. Attendance is near 100%, with young people achieving at or above their predicted levels of attainment. Some young people have struggled with mainstream education and are awaiting alternative provision. Nevertheless, they engage well in a structured programme of education provided by staff within the home.

p.2

This inspection

Young people are in excellent health. They attend all necessary appointments to keep themselves well. Some also make positive use of services to address their emotional well-being. Young people have made significant progress in developing greater maturity and resilience. One said, ‘I have improved a lot, I open up more to staff and talk about things that make me upset.’ Older young people are being supported to become more independent and self-reliant. They have greater freedom to associate with friends outside the home and make their own choices about how they use their leisure time. Staff are particularly effective in encouraging and supporting all young people to enjoy activities within the community.

p.2

This inspection

Relationships between staff and young people are excellent. Young people value the individual attention that staff provide and they enjoy going out together on social occasions. For example, there are regular outings to local restaurants. Staff are highly aware of young people’s needs and vulnerabilities. Care plans are robust and discussed with the young people themselves. Staff advocate for young people and promote their welfare effectively. One young person said, ‘I’ve started having contact with my family. This wouldn’t have happened if staff hadn’t pushed and pushed for it.’ Staff allow young people to make informed choices, consistent with keeping them safe. Young people generally behave very well, and the need to use physical restraint has reduced significantly. There have been no incidents of young people going missing from the home for some time. 3 of 6 The Registered Manager has addressed most of the statutory requirements and

p.2

This inspection

recommendations from the last inspection, resulting in a number of improvements. Notably, actions and decisions arising from looked after reviews are now promptly recorded on young people’s files. This ensures that all staff are aware of any changes to the care plan. Also, staff have received bullying training. This has improved staff’s understanding and awareness of the issue and how to respond to it if necessary.

p.3

This inspection

However, one requirement and one recommendation have not been addressed and so have been repeated. These are in relation to the home’s Statement of Purpose and the Registered Manager’s evaluation of the staff learning programme. In addition, there are several other shortfalls in leadership and management. These do not significantly impact on the welfare of young people but detract from the otherwise excellent performance of the home. Vetting checks on staff do not always demonstrate that an individual’s employment record has been scrutinised. Where an applicant’s history raises concerns, there is no consistent recording of how this is explored or of how decisions on appointment are made. These failings reduce confidence in the recruitment process. Furthermore, confidential staff records are not kept securely and do not comply with data protection good practice. 4 of 6

p.3

Information about this children’s home

The home provides care and accommodation for up to three children who may have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. The home is owned and operated by a private provider.

p.4

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

11/06/2014 Full good 03/03/2014 Interim good progress 12/12/2013 Full adequate 17/10/2013 Full inadequate

p.4

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

5 (2001) notify HMCI of any revision to the Statement of Purpose within 28 days (Regulation 5(a) and (b)) 24/04/2015

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure that no person works in the children’s home unless they are fit to do so, specifically that all required information is available prior to employment. (Regulation 26(3)(d)(Schedule 2)) 24/04/2015

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure that the learning and development programme is evaluated for effectiveness at least annually and if necessary is updated (NMS 18.2) 5 of 6  ensure that CRB (DBS) disclosure information is kept in secure conditions (NMS 16.4)  keep a record of how decisions are reached as to who is to be appointed in the light of any criminal convictions or other concerns that are declared or discovered during the recruitment process. (NMS 16.5) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.4

Recommendations

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.6

What inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion