Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home, Residential special school run by Staffordshire County Council in Staffordshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectors verified
Rachel Ruth Britten
- Previous overall verified
Outstanding
- Postcode verified
ST16 2DH
- URN verified
SC415138
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Immediate action is taken to address any issues raised by this monitoring. p.4
- This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. p.6
- At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.6
- This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 304
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC415138 Inspector Rachel Ruth Britten Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Registered person Staffordshire County Council Registered person address Staffordshire County Council, Wedgwood Buildings Tipping Street STAFFORD ST16 2DH Responsible individual Richard Ronald Hancock Registered manager Sarah Jane Lunn Date of last inspection 12/12/2014 2 of 6 Inspection date 13/03/2015
p.1
Previous inspection outstanding Enforcement action since last inspection none
p.2
This inspection
This home was judged outstanding at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .
p.2
This inspection
Children and young people with learning and physical disabilities continue to receive very high quality care and support on a short-breaks basis. A number of young people are leaving the service after many years because they have reached eighteen. These young people have had a fond farewell and have taken away memorabilia of their time here. A number of children are beginning to use the service. They are benefitting from well thought out programmes of introduction to the setting before having their first overnight or weekend stays. Recent reports from the setting's monthly visitor provide clear evidence that children and young people are achieving their targets. For example, one young person achieved one of his targets, 'to clear pots away from the table after his meal'. He initiated clearing his breakfast dishes away and washed them without being given any verbal prompts. ‘He was given lots of praise for completing these tasks without having to be given
p.2
This inspection
The service's Registered Manager is resuming fulltime leadership following many months off. She is a highly skilled and motivated leader who is quick to identify some shortfalls in monitoring during her absence. She is making renewed efforts to assure the quality of children’s risk assessments, behaviour plans and targets. This supports staff to push children and young people as much as possible to try new things and maximise their progress. However, details of how risks are managed when equipment is not working are not clearly recorded to ensure consistent practice in every case. For example, a mattress alarm designed to alert staff if a child has a seizure during the night is not currently working. Staff and parents have agreed that the child's night time monitoring checks are conducted using visual checks and a baby monitor. However, the risk assessment on file does not make this clear enough.
p.2
This inspection
There are renewed efforts underway to obtain feedback and consult with children, 3 of 6 young people, parents, and carers. For example, an electronic button selection machine has been placed in the entrance for children and young people to answer the question, 'how much have you enjoyed your stay?’ Parents and carers continue to thank the service regularly for the good quality care children and young people receive. However, a number of complaints have been received about the organisation of short breaks and about specific lapses in care quality. Complaint records do not show all the action taken in response to each complaint. The records are not looked at regularly enough to remind managers of the actions they need to take to drive investigations forward quickly. Nevertheless, short breaks dates are now being provided earlier and take account of parents' date requests. All parents are being surveyed to seek their views about the complaints process.
p.2
This inspection
The Registered Manager stated: 'we need to get our focus back on what is important.' She is recruiting to fill staff vacancies. She is renewing her drive with partner agencies to plan reviews so that children and young people can attend and participate. She is ensuring that the new children's guide, which has been planned for many months, is produced and used. She is monitoring staff and children's files. In so doing, she has found instances where staff are not acting on the decisions made in children's reviews or revising children's targets to push their achievements and progress. She has also found that staff are not communicating directly with parents and carers often enough, through home visits and phone calls. The upward trend in complaints may be indicative of these issues. A renewed focus on training, support and supervision is addressing these identified shortfalls. 4 of 6
p.3
Information about this children’s home
This resource centre provides short-break care for up to six young people who have learning and/or physical disabilities and/or sensory impairments. The service is managed by a local authority.
p.4
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
12/12/2014 Full outstanding 28/02/2014 Interim good progress 08/01/2014 Full outstanding 21/03/2013 Interim good progress
p.4
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.4
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) ensure that a written record is made of any complaint, the action taken in response and the outcome of the investigation. (Regulation 24 (5) 16/04/2015
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that each child's placement plan is monitored by a key person within the home who ensures that the requirements of the plan are implemented in the day-to-day care of that child (NMS 25.2) ensure that there is regular monitoring of all records kept by the home to ensure compliance with the home's policies, to identify concerns about 5 of 6 specific incidents and to identify patterns and trends. Immediate action is taken to address any issues raised by this monitoring. (NMS 21.2) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.4
Recommendations
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.6
What inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion