Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Keys Child Care Limited in Warrington
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectors verified
Chris Scully
- Postcode verified
BT9 5NW
- URN verified
SC026991
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. p.7
- At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.7
- This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 327
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 34, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 25 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC026991 Inspector Chris Scully Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Registered person Keys Childcare Ltd Registered person address Laganwood House 44 New Forge Lane Belfast BT9 5NW Responsible individual Heather Ann Laffin Registered manager POST VACANT Date of last inspection 23/07/2014 2 of 7 Inspection date 04/03/2015
p.1
Previous inspection adequate Enforcement action since last inspection none
p.2
This inspection
This home was judged adequate at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has improved effectiveness .
p.2
This inspection
The home appointed a new manager in January 2014. She was formerly the deputy of the home and has just submitted an application to register as the manager with Ofsted. The manager acknowledges there was a delay in her application while awaiting her Disclosure and Barring (DBS) check.
p.2
This inspection
Three members of staff have left the home in the last few weeks to pursue alternative careers. Staff from other homes in the organisation who are known to the young people are providing additional support while new staff are recruited. This does not appear at this time to have had a detrimental effect upon the care provided to the young people. The recruitment and vetting procedures have improved. This is because staff files now contain all of the required information, such as copies of their qualifications certificates.
p.2
This inspection
The home has addressed the issues raised as a result of the last inspection. The home is more secure due to the repairs to the perimeter fencing and the installation of the new gates. Some maintenance work has been undertaken and young people have been actively involved in choosing the new colour schemes. This has created a brighter and more homely environment in the lounge. However, this is not the case throughout the home as some young people’s bedrooms and some carpets are looking tired and worn. These issues detract from the homely environment staff are striving to achieve. Also the locks on bathroom doors are not able to be opened from the outside. This means staff cannot gain immediate access should a young person lock themselves in or need support from staff.
p.2
This inspection
Young people are pleased that they now have access to a private telephone in the home and are beginning to take advantage of this. Staff said some young people continue to prefer to use the office phone, but it is good that they now have a choice to talk to friends and family in private. 3 of 7 Consultation with young people has improved and they now have a greater say in what happens within the home and their care. For example, young people have asked that staff are made aware that sometimes they need to go to their room and shout, so that they can 'get their mad out.' This means young people are more able to manage their feelings in a constructive manner.
p.2
This inspection
Staff effectively use the young people’s own language in their records to describe their feelings, such as 'I flip.’ Staff then provide additional information to the reader as to what this means in practice. This means young people have control over what is written about them and are able to contribute to the plans created to support them.
p.3
This inspection
Young people have been instrumental in establishing the house rules and the consequences for not following them. This means young people have a strong sense of ownership and are confident to challenge any situations which they feel are unfair. For example, talking to staff about what constitutes an appropriate snack afterschool. They then feel confident to challenge staff with what they perceive to be an inequality. For example, explaining why it is not fair that another young person has made an inappropriate snack for themselves.
p.3
This inspection
Records and documentation are well maintained and are enhanced as current paperwork from local authorities is in place for each young person. This means staff are more able to plan effectively for each young person’s day-to-day care. However, some of the recording of consequences do not show the time the problem occurred and do not clearly reflect what happened. This does not help staff to reflect upon the situation and learn from the incident. This has not been picked up in the manager’s monitoring of the records.
p.3
This inspection
The manger’s monitoring of the home is generally sound. For example, the manager identifies where additional information is needed or a document should be update. This is not reflected within their monitoring reports and does not promote transparency or indicate how the home is moving forward. Reports by the independent person are now received by Ofsted every month. These reports generally cover all of the required areas but in recent months have lacked any comments from young people and family members. This means the independent person is missing out on valuable information that will aid their assessment of the service.
p.3
This inspection
Staff are sound advocates for young people. The manger confidently challenges other professionals to ensure young people receive the right support. For example, they work in partnership with schools and social workers to secure the most appropriate educational placement for young people. Young people’s education is well supported and they are all encouraged to complete their homework when they come home from school. They enjoy friendly, appropriate banter with staff. 4 of 7 Young people enjoy a range of activities throughout the week. They attend rugby clubs and cadets. Some young people have attended camps with the cadets, something they had not previously experienced. Staff said they were very tired when they returned, but this was a very valuable experience for them which has increased their confidence and self-esteem. 5 of 7
p.3
Information about this children’s home
The service is run by an established private provider. The home is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to four young people with attachment disorders.
p.5
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
23/07/2014 Full adequate 31/01/2014 Interim satisfactory progress 20/09/2013 Full good 10/01/2013 Interim good progress
p.5
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.5
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) ensure the independent person carrying out the monitoring visit of the home shall and with their consent talk to the children accommodated , their parents, and relatives in order to form an opinion of the standard of care provided in the home (Regulation 33 (4)(a)) 10/04/2015
p.5
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.5
Recommendations
ensure entries in records are clearly expressed, non-stigmatising and distinguish as far as possible fact, opinion and third party information in 6 of 7 particular the consequences book (NMS 22.4) enhance further the monitoring by the manager in particular reports are evaluative and identify and patters, trends, shortfalls such as times of consequences not being recorded and the action taken to rectify this (NMS21.2) ensure the home is well maintained and decorated in particular some young people bedrooms, worn carpets and the locks on bathroom doors (NMS 10.3) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.5
Recommendations
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.7
What inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.
p.7
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.7
Information about this inspection
The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion