Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by The Rose Road Association in Southampton
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectors verified
Suzy Lemmy
- Previous overall verified
Good
- URN verified
SC042446
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. p.5
- At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.5
- This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 216
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 32, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC042446 Inspector Suzy Lemmy Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Registered manager Jane Alexandra Corbett Date of last inspection 18/03/2014 2 of 5 Inspection date 19/03/2015
p.1
Previous inspection good progress Enforcement action since last inspection none
p.2
This inspection
This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has improved effectiveness .
p.2
This inspection
The overall effectiveness of the home has improved since the last inspection in December. The Registered Manager is driving forward improvements. The home continues to offer children who stay for short breaks good outcomes and a good quality of care. This means that the children are able to develop skills and enjoy their stays. Positive interactions between staff and children were observed, staff manage challenging behaviour with a calm, patient and firm approach.
p.2
This inspection
The Registered Manager has addressed the requirements and recommendations from the previous inspection. She has revised the Statement of Purpose, which is in an easy to read format. It was acknowledged that this does not yet include the home’s policy in regards to emergency admission.
p.2
This inspection
The management oversight of the recruitment process is robust; an action plan is in place to improve recruitment processes, track responsibilities, deadlines and completion dates. The Registered Manager and Registered Individual undertake regular audits and reviews of these processes. This ensures that staff have the necessary experience and children are cared for safely.
p.2
This inspection
Staff are highly trained and confident in their role; there is an ethos of self- development. All staff have recently been trained to use Makaton. Children experience a consistent approach to communication by staff trained in the specific communication methods that children use. A staff member said that the induction and subsequent training was of a high standard and staff are tested on their understanding of the content of the training before they are able to work with the young people. They also have opportunities to gain further relevant qualifications.
p.2
This inspection
The Registered Manager has devised a new form for completing internal monitoring in line with the new regulations. This includes consulting with children, parents and 3 of 5 placing authorities. However, this was not evident in the recent Regulation 34 report. Meaningful ways to consult with children in future reports are being explored.
p.2
This inspection
The Registered Manager oversees supervision timescales, to ensure that all staff receive timely supervision. Staff feel supported by the management and report that they can ask for advice and guidance. Team meetings are effective; staff discuss performance issues and plans for development. This means that the children benefit from continuing improvements in their care.
p.3
This inspection
Staff encourage children to reach measurable targets during their short break stays. Children continue to develop skills, linked to their educational goals. This gives the children a sense of achievement as well as ensuring that they can use skills in both home and school settings. The children work at their own pace and are able to achieve small steps and celebrate success. The Registered Manager is improving relationships with schools and commissioning authorities to ensure that the children’s plans are in line with education, health and care plans. This means that the children will have a consistent approach to their identified outcomes. A parent said that the staff worked effectively with professionals when her child‘s behaviour became more challenging. Staff advocated on the child’s behalf to ensure that she was cared for safely during the night. The child has been able to settle and work through her difficulties as a result, her mother said ‘she is really excited when she
p.3
This inspection
knows she is going to stay’. Generally, liaison between the home and professionals is good; however, staff did not inform a social worker about a recent complaint or the outcome of the investigation. The Registered Manager recognises this shortfall and made changes to the complaints policy and records.
p.3
This inspection
The home is in good decorative order; children have access to equipment that they need for their physical and social needs. They can use a soft play area and sensory room during their stay. Hoist tracking systems mean that they have access to all areas of the home. Children’s rooms are individually decorated and personalised. This gives them a sense of ownership and belonging and increases their self-esteem.
p.3
This inspection
Staff are well informed about the children’s care plans, which clearly describe children’s targets. Children benefit from a coordinated and consistent approach to their care. Staff work across both the children and adult services, which means that transitions to the adult short break service, is a natural process. Young people can quickly adapt to the change.
p.3
This inspection
The Registered Manager is aware of the strengths of the services and the need for continual improvement to enable the children to receive a high level of care and positive experience during their short break stays. 4 of 5
p.3
Information about this children’s home
The service offers short breaks for up to 12 children and young people with learning disabilities. It is run by a registered charity. The service is available to children and young people, of both sexes, aged between two years and 17 years. The building is dually registered with both Ofsted and the Care Quality Commission to provide residential care.
p.4
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
18/03/2014 Interim good progress 03/12/2013 Full good 14/02/2013 Interim satisfactory progress 06/11/2012 Full good
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that the views of the child, the child's family, social worker and Independent Reviewing Officer (IRO) are sought regularly on the child's care, specifically in respect of Regulation 34 reports (NMS 1.4) ensure that the children's home Statement of Purpose, includes the home’s policy on emergency admissions (NMS 13) ensure the written complaints procedure is robust and followed in practice, especially in relation to informing the Local Authority about any complaints and ensuring this is in the home complaints procedures. (NMS 21.10) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.4
Recommendations
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.5
What inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion