Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 Apr 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Edwards

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Edwards

  • Postcode verified

    DT3 5AN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserobusteffectivelyvery welloutstandingeffectiveimprovedengagingconsistently
Criticismweaknessesyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
925
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Sara Adams Acting Headteacher The Wey Valley School Dorchester Road Weymouth Dorset DT3 5AN

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 19 March 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 implement a robust system for checking on the performance of teachers and the quality of teaching throughout the school  commission a review of the pupil premium funding.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit I met with you, senior and middle leaders, members of the governing body, a support staff representative and pupil representatives to discuss the actions taken since the most recent inspection. Together we carried out brief visits to lessons and spoke with some pupils about their work. Documents including school improvement action plans were evaluated. Tribal Kings Orchard 1 Queens Street Bristol, BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5269 Email : klara.davies@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Context

The principal is currently absent from school. A middle leader left the school at the end February 2015. There are currently two vacancies on the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

Following the inspection the governing body surveyed staff to identify how they might work more effectively with staff to secure lasting school improvements. The governing body used the results of the staff survey to challenge the principal and senior leaders about weaknesses in leadership and management. As a result, governors are now working closely with you and senior leaders to strengthen the school’s leadership in order to improve the behaviour of students and the quality of teaching.

p.2

Main findings

Following your appointment, you have worked systematically and with determination since taking up your role as acting principal to draft a school action plan that is focused on addressing the areas for improvement that were identified in the inspection report. You have improved communication channels within the school. You have begun the process of empowering senior leaders to take more responsibility for leading on school improvement initiatives. Clear leadership responsibilities have been agreed and distributed to senior leaders. As a result, leaders at all levels say they now possess not only a clearer understanding of the improvement priorities for the school but the part they have to play in the process. All teaching and support staff have been kept up-to-date with what the school needs to do to improve. In addition, a monthly ‘staff forum’ now gives staff the opportunity to have their views and opinions listened to by senior leaders.

p.2

Main findings

Strategies to measure the impact of the school’s work have only just been introduced. Senior leaders are in the process of designing a comprehensive system to monitor students’ learning and progress. As a result, leaders are focusing more sharply on engaging pupils’ in lessons and securing consistently good teaching provision and securing students’ higher achievements. During our brief visits to classrooms we saw teaching and support staff working closely together in order to keep students successfully engaged in learning. The students who spoke with me said they felt very well supported by their teachers and were keen to talk about their work. I was particularly impressed with the photographic work some Year 11 students showed me.

p.2

Main findings

Work has begun to involve all stakeholders, including students, in establishing a consistent and fair approach to the management of pupils’ behaviour. Students who met with me spoke very positively about the proposed Students’ Learning Charter. They appreciate the work their teachers do to provide them with a wide range of enjoyable learning opportunities and say they are given helpful advice in order to improve their work and achieve their end of year grades. Students were also able to identify where improvements to the management of students’ behaviour had been made, such as in the increase of staff on duty around the school.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have gained a much clearer understanding of their roles and responsibilities. They have begun to work closely with you and your senior leaders to check on the work of the school and are gaining confidence to ask challenging questions of you and other leaders. Governors now regularly receive good quality information from you and other leaders which they say is much clearer to understand. As a result, governors are now exercising greater confidence to hold you and the school more effectively to account. You and they acknowledge there is still further work to be done, for example to establish a more robust system for checking on the performance of teachers and the quality of teaching.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The school is wisely drawing on a wide range of external partners, including a self- evaluation partner and coaching expertise from the leader of a local outstanding academy. The school has yet to commission a review of the pupil premium funding. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Dorset.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion