Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Apr 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Simon Hughes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Simon Hughes

  • Postcode verified

    BN22 0SS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexemplarypositivehigh-qualityextremelyeffectivesecureconsistentlyenjoy
Criticismpoornot effectivenot confidentexclusionsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1021w+54
  • What needs to improve85w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,097
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Mrs Jane Foyle Headteacher Oakwood Primary Academy Magnolia Drive Eastbourne BN22 0SS

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Oakwood Primary Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 17 March 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and the time you took to discuss behaviour in your academy.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Oakwood Primary Academy

The inspection was a monitoring inspection carried out in accordance with the no formal designation procedures and conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was carried out because the Chief Inspector was concerned about behaviour at the academy.

p.1

Evidence

The inspector considered evidence including:

p.1

Evidence

 observations of pupils’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning in lessons  observations of pupils’ behaviour throughout the day, including discussion with pupils  documentary evidence  discussions with academy leaders and staff.

p.1

Evidence

Having evaluated all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

Leaders and managers have taken effective action to improve behaviour and secure consistently positive attitudes to learning. Tribal Kings Orchard, One Queen Street, Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Context

Oakwood Primary Academy is a large academy with 404 pupils on roll. About a quarter of the pupils are from minority ethnic groups. A very small minority speak English as an additional language. Nearly half are entitled to free school meals. About a fifth are included in the register of special educational needs. About 5% of these have statements, some of which are for behavioural, social or emotional needs. A significant proportion of the pupils leave or join the school during each academic year. The staff is relatively stable and there are no vacancies currently.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils’ attitudes to learning nearly all of the time and in the vast majority of lessons are good. Pupils listen carefully to teachers and teaching assistants, and to each other. Teachers and teaching assistants respect the pupils and take great care of them. This has resulted in good relationships based on trust. Pupils take pride in their work and look after their books. This is most evident in the time taken to present their handwriting neatly. The academy provides good models for this in the presentation of its high-quality wall displays. However, when teaching is less effective, pupils spend long periods of time in quite cramped conditions, sitting on the carpet just listening. This means that they become uncomfortable, restless and fidget. Occasionally this means they bump into each other. Some respond appropriately but a few react aggressively.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils conduct themselves well around the school. They move to and from the playground, classrooms and the dining hall quietly, sensibly and in good order. Teachers and teaching assistants firmly but politely insist that they follow the well- rehearsed routines for lining up and walking. The school has clear routines for lunchtime, and the behaviour, at table, of all pupils, including the youngest, is exemplary. Adults help pupils maintain the high standards by gentle encouragement of good table manners. Playtimes and lunchtimes are managed well by a combination of adequate supervision, a sensible division of ‘sittings’ and careful timetabling of play spaces such as the ‘cage’ for football. Leaders have acted decisively to create a simple system of rewards. This means that there is a positive emphasis on good behaviour. Pupils like this. Pupils also enjoy the opportunities to act as leaders or as mentors to younger pupils. This helps them act maturely and

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The vast majority of pupils rarely disrupt their own or others’ work. However, a small minority of pupils have very challenging behaviour. This is addressed extremely skilfully and compassionately by teachers or teaching assistants when it occurs. They are adept at deciding when to remove the pupil from lessons, when to ignore attention-seeking behaviour and when to respond. The academy is committed to the view that ‘all behaviour is a form of communication’. Intense personal work is undertaken with those with the most challenging needs and leaders rightly decide when professional assistance is needed from experts in other settings. Leaders have also set up a nurture facility. Pupils with the most challenging behaviour are supported in this setting. As a result they are learning to behave more appropriately in their main classes. Around the time of the last full inspection, the Aurora Academies Trust appointed a

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

teacher with particular expertise in behaviour management. The impact of this behaviour specialist has been extensive already. She provides good-quality training to all teachers and teaching assistants. She has built a good system for tracking the behaviour of pupils and uses this information to provide additional support where it is most needed. This senior leader also manages well the work of individual needs assistants (INAs) so that it is sharply focused on improving behaviour for all pupils. Leaders also welcome the support provided for these pupils by a range of external agencies. The behaviour specialist quickly developed a sensible plan, once appointed. The plan shows clearly by when improvements will have been achieved. The plan is reviewed regularly and updated constantly. As a result behaviour is kept in the forefront of everyone’s thinking.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Leaders have acted effectively to improve site security. Since the inspection the perimeter has been made secure with a very good fence. All gates are operated by a number code so that access to the academy is tightly controlled now. Parents and the local community like this. Nearly all parents indicated through a recent survey that they believe the academy keeps their children safe.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Parents were less confident about the academy’s work in relation to bullying. Pupils know what bullying is and they also know about different types of bullying. Pupils know that the use of some ‘names’ is wrong but a few still choose to use derogatory language from time to time. Leaders deal with this robustly and have excluded pupils for abusive language aimed at members of staff. This means that the school has relatively high levels of exclusions. Leaders accept this as a necessary means of challenging poor behaviour.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils’ attendance remains below average despite leaders’ continual work to improve it. The introduction of rewards for good attendance has helped. So far the academy has not used a full range of strategies, such as issuing fixed-penalty notices, to support its work in this area.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Reduce further the occasions when pupils become restless and fidget by decreasing the amount of time they spend sitting on the carpet in close proximity to each other.  Use the full range of strategies available to help improve attendance.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Director of Children’s Services, to the Secretary of State for Education, the Chair of the local advisory board and the Academies Advisers Unit at the Department for Education. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion