Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Pear Tree Projects Limited in Durham

Inspected — · published 18 Apr 2015 · URN SC007608

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michele Hargan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Michele Hargan

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DL2 2UQ

  • URN verified

    SC007608

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveclearclearlyimprovedsafe
Criticismdeclinedlimitedharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings65w−33
  • What needs to improve369w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Unique reference number SC007608 Inspector Michele Hargan Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Registered person Pear Tree Projects Limited Registered person address Toy Top Farm Houghton Bank, Heighington Darlington County Durham DL2 2UQ Responsible individual David Anthony John Bartlett Registered manager Gillian Graham Date of last inspection 24/10/2014 2 of 6 Inspection date 26/02/2015

p.1

Previous inspection good Enforcement action since last inspection None

p.2

This inspection

This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .

p.2

This inspection

Young people are cared for by a stable care team who know them well and who young people describe as ‘good.’ Young people said if they felt unhappy ‘we could talk to any of the staff.’ As a result young people learn to establish an appropriate level of reliance on staff, building trust and promoting feelings of security.

p.2

This inspection

Young people live in good quality accommodation set within it's own grounds which is well maintained, safe and appropriately secure. Young people are encouraged to personalise their bedrooms reflecting their individual interests and hobbies. This approach promotes feelings of self-worth and belonging by young people.

p.2

This inspection

Staff place a great deal of emphasis for young people on promoting a healthy life style and participating in outdoor country pursuits. Young people said, ‘We’ve been fishing at the farm’. Also, ‘ I won first place in show jumping and cross country.’ A senior member of staff said, ‘we are going to start planting some vegetables again in the spring.’ This approach develops young people social skills, increases self- esteem and promotes their physical wellbeing.

p.2

This inspection

Staff encourage young people to spend regular time reading and this is also a primary focus at Pear Tree school. A young person said, ‘I won the reading cup for most improved reader and third place for accelerated reader and this is the second time'. Rewarding achievements such as improved reading increases young people's self esteem and furthers their interest in academic accomplishments.

p.2

This inspection

Young people receive support from staff during contact with their families helping them manage difficult feelings that can arise at such times. This arrangement increases empathic understanding by staff about the emotional impact for young people of contact. This also enables staff to more effectively advocate any issues relating to contact in the best interests of young people. 3 of 6 A requirement made at the time of the last inspection not due to be implemented until June 2015 about training has already been responded to; the Registered Manager has attended training in attachment and the impact of trauma on children’s development. This has increased understanding of young people’s underlying needs. A senior member of staff said, ‘It made me understand more about young people’s fight or flight behaviour.’ The provision of good quality training increases staff awareness of young people's individual underlying needs resulting in more tailored

p.2

This inspection

A recommendation for staff not to require young people to sign for elements of their care has been carefully considered, markedly reducing the practice. Young people said, ‘We don’t sign medical forms, we sign for pocket money, don’t sign for anything else, apart from key worker sessions, house meetings.’ Another young person said, ‘I think signing for things is boring’. Reducing practices that are institutional helps lessen young people's feelings of difference from their peers who are not looked after.

p.3

This inspection

Some young people’s looked after reviews and care plans are markedly out of date and a pathway plan is poor quality despite repeated requests to the placing authority for up to date documentation. Lack of this information disadvantages young people; this also undermines systems designed to ensure young people have access to all relevant information about their care and future plans.

p.3

This inspection

A recommendation made at the time of the last inspection to demonstrate how the quality of care is improved for young people has not been responded to. A senior member of staff said, ‘we thought this was made clear within young people’s reviews.’ This means opportunities to build on good practice and address any areas for development are overlooked, ultimately disadvantaging young people. A recommendation relating to risk assessment to make clear what action staff take to in the event of any self-harm behaviours is also still not clear. This omission potentially puts young people at increased risk.

p.3

This inspection

Staff do not make clear within the sanction log details of young people’s behaviour leading to the sanction or the name of the member of staff administering it. As a result it is difficult to discern any patterns or themes in relation to this and to measure the effectiveness of the measures used. 4 of 6

p.3

Information about this children’s home

The home accommodates up to three young people who have emotional and behavioural difficulties. It is provided by a private organisation.

p.4

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

24/10/2014 Full good 12/02/2014 Interim good progress 01/10/2013 Full good 06/11/2012 Interim good progress

p.4

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

17B (2001) ensure that within 24 hours of the use of any measure of control, restraint, or discipline in a children's home, a written record is made in a volume kept for the purpose of which shall include details of the behaviour leading to the use of the measure; the name of the person using the measure, and of any other person present. (Regulation 17B (3) (b) ( e ) ) 31/03/2015

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure the home implements a proportionate approach to any risk 5 of 6 assessment. In particular, make clear within risk assessments that in the event of any self harm type behaviour by any young person what effective measures are to be taken in consultation with other professionals to reduce the risk and keep the young people safe. (NMS 4.5)  ensure the result of all statutory reviews and reviews of placement plans are recorded on the child's file, and individuals responsible for pursuing actions at the home arising form reviews are clearly identified. In particular to ensure where reviews and care plans are not received after repeated requests to the social worker that this is raised at a senior level with placing authorities (NMS 25.8)  ensure there are clear and effective procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the home. In particular, reports relating to review of quality of care clearly demonstrates improvements in the quality

p.4

Recommendations

of care available to children. (NMS 21.1) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.5

Recommendations

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.6

What inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion