Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 Apr 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jane Austin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jane Austin

  • Postcode verified

    DH1 5BQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 65% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivestrongsuccessfullyenthusiasticclear
Criticismlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1009w+67
  • What needs to improve62w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,056
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 94%What needs to improve 6%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr A Nicholas Headteacher Framwellgate School Durham Newton Drive Framwellgate Moor Durham DH1 5BQ

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 17-18 March 2015 to look at the school’s use of alternative provision. During the visit I met with you, the deputy headteacher, the assistant headteacher with responsibility for the curriculum, the director of the achievement centre, a governor and a group of Year 11 students. I observed a horticultural assessment session involving Year 10 students. I also met the coordinator of the EDDY project (Engage·Divert·Develop·Young People), as well as the horticultural trainer.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school has a clear rationale for incorporating alternative provision into the curriculum, set out in a statement that is reviewed annually. The rationale is shared by staff and governors, and there is a strong sense of common moral purpose in providing appropriately for the individual needs of students.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school works successfully with two established providers to customise alternative provision so that experiences offered off-site are combined with learning in school to lead to recognised qualifications. The providers’ aims are closely aligned to those of the school.  The school conducts an annual safeguarding audit that includes checks on alternative providers. Requirements and procedures are thorough and systematic. Providers and the school have shared their respective safeguarding policies so there is clarity about expectations and reporting routes. Risk assessments for activities and transport are detailed. Appropriate safety clothing is provided for students when they participate in activities.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The provision is intended primarily to meet students’ personal development needs. The practical nature of the off-site activities and the challenges they present, for instance in learning to climb, are designed to increase students’ motivation and engagement in learning more widely. A balanced and varied curriculum that includes different ways of learning has been put together, with the flexibility to respond to individuals’ subject preferences. The academic demands of the alternative provision courses are appropriate.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school shares with providers a range of relevant information about students’ learning needs, as well as the amount and type of academic and pastoral support they have received by the end of Key Stage 3. This gives providers a reasonable picture of levels of need. However, academic levels and targets could be shared in writing earlier in the programme. Some information about safeguarding students is also shared verbally.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Alternative provision is built into the timetable as an option so students do not miss teaching in other subjects when off site. The taught components of both the courses contained in this curriculum option are delivered in school.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 All alternative provision students follow GCSE courses in English and mathematics in school. In 2014, all 10 students on this pathway gained a GCSE in English at grades D to G. Eight students gained a GCSE in mathematics at grades D to G while one student gained a grade C. In the current Year 11 cohort, three students are on track to gain a grade C in GCSE English or mathematics, or both. Eight are expected to gain grades D to G in both subjects.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school’s data shows that, overall, these students are not making the nationally expected rate of progress. However, the school judges that alternative provision has had a positive impact on their attitudes to learning, their behaviour and their aspirations. The school’s tracking and reporting systems show that a number now need much less support to regulate their behaviour, although low attendance remains an issue for several. The behaviour and achievements of this group of students are tracked in the same way as that of their peers. However, while any negatives that occur off site are logged, positives are less likely to be recorded.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The qualifications students gain in horticulture, personal effectiveness and employability skills are nationally recognised and provide a sound basis for their next steps, post 16. It was evident in discussion that current Year 11 students now have ambitions to pursue college courses or gain apprenticeships linked, in the main, to the experiences they have had through alternative provision. In 2014, all alternative provision students went on to college courses or apprenticeships. About half chose to build on the skills they had learned through the horticulture projects.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school and providers work very closely together to deliver the qualifications jointly. Staff monitor the delivery of the practical elements either through accompanying students to a provider on all occasions or through regular visits. Students’ progress is monitored although only their progress in the ASDAN COPE course is included in the school’s regular tracking and reporting.

p.3

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The performance of students on alternative provision is included in the school’s self-assessment cycle, which incorporates an annual review of examination results. Consequently, it forms part of the headteacher’s reports to the governing body. Information about academic performance is accompanied by case studies so that governors can gain a view of the impact of alternative provision on the wider achievements of individual students.  The students I spoke to were enthusiastic about the opportunities they have to learn and meet challenges through off-site provision. They recognise that they are in some ways privileged to be able to learn to climb or to work on the mechanics of go-karts as part of the curriculum. Students say that such activities have helped to improve their motivation in other lessons and had a positive impact on their behaviour. They value the qualifications they are gaining through alternative provision and,

p.3

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

together with the experiences, say these put them in a better position to choose what they will do post-16.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 making sure that sufficient written information is shared with providers to ensure that they are fully alert to any safeguarding risks faced by individual students  adding the City and Guilds Practical Horticulture Skills course to regular reports on students’ progress  ensuring that the successes of students on alternative provision courses are recognised and included in the whole-school tracking system.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion