Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 Apr 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Redpath

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Redpath

  • Postcode verified

    DT11 7SQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly skilledeffectivelysuccessfulenthusiasticpositiveimprovingclearsecure
Criticismlack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings702w+62
  • What needs to improve41w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
731
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 94%What needs to improve 6%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs S Wilson Headteacher The Blandford School Milldown Road Blandford Forum Dorset DT11 7SQ

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 2– 3 March 2015 to look at the school’s use of alternative provision. During the visit I met with you, the deputy headteacher, three assistant headteachers, the business manager, behaviour manager and the special educational needs co-ordinator. I also met students and visited the following providers that your students attend: Rylands Care Farm and Equilibrium.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school has worked closely with other schools in the North Dorset Partnership to commission alternative provision and to ensure that it is of a suitable quality.  Alternative provision is chosen carefully and is particularly successful in meeting the personal needs and interests of students. Students are prepared well for making their choices through visits and ‘taster’ sessions.  The school timetable is planned effectively so that students choose to attend courses available at alternative provision alongside other optional courses offered in school. This ensures that all students follow a balanced curriculum which leads to a broad range of qualifications.  The accommodation and resources available at the off-site provision are of a good standard and support learning effectively. Staff at the provision are enthusiastic, highly skilled and have a very good understanding of students’ needs. They send the school regular progress reports on

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

students’ achievement, effort and attendance; although the reports from one provider lack detail.  Appropriate health and safety and safeguarding arrangements are in place at the off-site provision. Managers at both alternative providers are well- qualified and experienced in child protection procedures. They report that the school prepares students well for attending alternative provision and that school staff are readily available should any issues arise.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students who attend alternative provision are able to achieve qualifications in English and mathematics at the appropriate level. The school’s analysis of its data indicates that the majority of students who are currently attending alternative provision are making expected progress in their GCSE courses. All students who left school at the end of 2014 and who had used alternative educational provision gained a GCSE pass in English and almost all gained a pass in mathematics.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school has some evidence to show that individual students are improving their personal and employability skills through attendance at alternative provision. Students also feel that this is the case. However, arrangements for recording formally students’ improvements in this area are underdeveloped. The courses studied provide a clear pathway to further training or work. All students who left school in 2014 progressed to further training, study or an apprenticeship linked to their work-related qualifications.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school keeps its use of alternative provision under regular review to ensure it is adapted to meet the changing needs of students who enter the school. It collects a good range of information on students’ academic progress, attendance and destinations when they leave to help evaluate the impact of provision. Staff visit alternative provision at least once each academic year and there are also regular discussions between students and key staff in school to check on students’ learning. The school does not have systematic arrangements for making visits and monitoring the quality of teaching and learning regularly throughout the year.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students have very positive views about their experience at the off-site provision, which is demonstrated by their high attendance. They feel it helps to provide greater variety in their school week. Typical comments were ‘It’s something you look forward to’…and ‘It releases some of the pressure.’ Students like learning in a practical way and are particularly appreciative of the skills of the staff at the alternative provision. They recognise that they are developing skills that will help them secure future employment.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 visiting and monitoring more systematically the quality of teaching and learning at off-site provision

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 receiving more detailed reports on students’ progress from one provider

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 recording more formally the gains students make in developing their personal and employability skills.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion