Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Stanford-Le-Hope Primary School
Summary
George Logan (lead), Clare Fletcher, Joanna Jones
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Mar 2015
- Inspectors verified
Clare Fletcher, George Logan, Joanna Jones
- Early years AI-checked
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SS17 0DF
- Name on report verified
Stanford-Le-Hope Primary School
- URN verified
139566
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.9
- A strong and effective leadership structure has been established since the school became an academy. p.4
- Senior leaders promote positive attitudes and strong values. p.4
- Most pupils show positive attitudes to learning, feel safe and behave well. p.1
- This contributes to the school’s high expectations of pupils’ behaviour and sets similarly high aspirations for teaching and learning. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.9
- Although some weaker aspects have not yet been fully addressed, improvements have been achieved in the overall pace of pupils’ learning and, in some classes, the quality of work in pupils’ books. p.4
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.9
- Consequently, the pace of change has accelerated and the school now responds to weaknesses more rapidly and to greater effect. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Standards in mathematics and in English grammar, punctuation and spelling were low at the end of Year 6 in 2014. p.1
- Although standards are now rising and some pupils are making good progress, particularly in Key Stage 1, progress in mathematics remains slower than in reading or writing in Key Stage 2. p.1
- Poorly-formed handwriting affects the progress of some pupils and the overall presentation and quality of their work. p.1
- Not all teachers have sufficiently high expectations of what pupils can achieve. p.1
- They do not always provide lesson activities that sufficiently challenge the full range of pupils, including the most able. p.1
- Although some marking of pupils’ work is thorough, it does not always help to raise standards across the school. p.1
- Disadvantaged pupils supported by extra funding are making better progress this year, but not yet enough to catch up with their classmates, or other pupils nationally, in English and mathematics. p.1
- An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management can be further improved. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 3,021
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Stanford-Le-Hope Primary School Copland Road, Stanford-le-Hope, SS17 0DF
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Not previously inspected as an academy This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Early years provision Good 2
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
Standards in mathematics and in English grammar, punctuation and spelling were low at the end of Year 6 in 2014. Although standards are now rising and some pupils are making good progress, particularly in Key Stage 1, progress in mathematics remains slower than in reading or writing in Key Stage 2. Poorly-formed handwriting affects the progress of some pupils and the overall presentation and quality of their work. Not all teachers have sufficiently high expectations of what pupils can achieve. They do not always provide lesson activities that sufficiently challenge the full range of pupils, including the most able. Although some marking of pupils’ work is thorough, it does not always help to raise standards across the school. Disadvantaged pupils supported by extra funding are making better progress this year, but not yet enough to catch up with their classmates, or other pupils nationally, in English and mathematics.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
Leadership has improved significantly since the academy opened. Expertise from within the academy trust has given leaders greater capacity to improve teaching and learning. The visually impaired pupils receive good support and achieve well. The best teaching for any age group is in the early years. Children make good progress, particularly in developing their language and literacy skills. The teaching of phonics (the linking of sounds and letters) has improved. This is contributing to better progress in reading. Most pupils show positive attitudes to learning, feel safe and behave well. The governors are well informed about pupils’ achievement and the quality of teaching, and are actively challenging the school’s leaders to accelerate the rate of improvement.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed learning in 20 lessons, four of which were seen jointly with the headteacher. Inspectors looked closely at pupils’ written work for the current school year. They listened to some pupils read. Meetings were held with a group of pupils, the vice-chair of the local governing body and two other governors, the chief executive officer and the primary consultant of the academy trust, the Director of Children’s Services at Thurrock Council and the school’s senior and subject leaders. Inspectors took account of the 42 responses to the staff questionnaire, the 16 responses to the online questionnaire, Parent View, and a letter from a parent. They also took account of a survey of parents’ views conducted recently by the school. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a range of school documents, including plans for improvement and records of checks on the quality of teaching. They also considered records of local
p.2
Information about this inspection
governing body meetings and those relating to behaviour, attendance, safeguarding and the systems used to check pupils’ progress.
p.2
Inspection team
George Logan, Lead inspector Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
Stanford-le-Hope Primary School is larger than the average-sized primary school. The large majority of pupils are White British. There are a few pupils from the Traveller community. The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs is above the national average. The proportion of pupils supported through the pupil premium is close to the national average. This is additional funding for pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals or in care. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6. In the early years, children of Nursery age attend only in the morning. Children in Reception all attend full time. The school hosts specially resourced provision for disabled pupils and those who have special educational
p.3
Information about this school
needs in the form of provision for visually-impaired pupils of primary age. Most of these pupils come from Thurrock. Six of the designated seven places are currently filled. Six Nursery places are reserved for children with complex learning and behavioural needs who are placed at the school on an observation and assessment basis. They are subsequently directed to schools that are best placed to meet their current needs. None of these places have been taken up in the present school year. Stanford-le-Hope Primary School became a sponsor-led academy on 1 June 2013, part of the St Clere’s Co-Operative Academy Trust. This group consists of one secondary school and three schools with primary- aged children, all located in Thurrock. Each school has a local governing body, which is, in turn, represented on the board of directors of the academy trust. The academy trust’s chief executive officer oversees all four schools.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching and achievement, particularly in mathematics, by: showing consistently high expectations of what pupils can achieve by setting challenging work for all groups of pupils, particularly the most able, and making sure that they complete it insisting that pupils’ written work, including their handwriting, is presented to a consistently high standard extending the high-quality marking evident in some classes across the school giving pupils have more opportunities to use and apply their mathematical skills in different subjects giving disadvantaged pupils the extra help they need, to ensure that that the gap in attainment with other pupils in school and nationally is narrowed further.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management can be further improved.
p.3
The leadership and management are good
A strong and effective leadership structure has been established since the school became an academy. The school’s capacity for improvement has increased significantly with ready access to a substantial pool of expertise across the family of schools. Consequently, the pace of change has accelerated and the school now responds to weaknesses more rapidly and to greater effect. The school’s plans for improvement are driving more rapid progress, although they have not yet had a full impact upon some aspects of teaching or pupils’ achievement.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
Senior leaders promote positive attitudes and strong values. The school’s vision and core values permeate all its work and its interactions with parents and other professionals. This contributes to the school’s high expectations of pupils’ behaviour and sets similarly high aspirations for teaching and learning.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
Key subject leaders such as those in charge of English and mathematics have an accurate overview of the strengths and weaknesses of their subjects and are closely involved in monitoring and supporting their colleagues. They understand their responsibility to drive improvement. The formation of a group to focus on improving teaching and learning and to secure good practice is having a positive impact. Raised expectations of all staff have helped to sustain the current brisk momentum of improvement. Leaders analyse data on pupils’ performance thoroughly so they have access to detailed information.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
The monitoring of teaching and other aspects of the school’s work, both by the school’s leaders and staff from the wider academy family, is increasingly effective. Although some weaker aspects have not yet been fully addressed, improvements have been achieved in the overall pace of pupils’ learning and, in some classes, the quality of work in pupils’ books. Leaders have securely established procedures for setting targets to improve teachers’ practice.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
The school has prepared well for the implementation of the new National Curriculum. It has chosen to use new themes and topics to incorporate all the expected subjects. The school has maintained its existing assessment system for pupils in Years 2 and 6 to provide detailed information about pupils’ progress. In the other year groups it is trying out a modified system of assessment. The school intends to review the effectiveness of the new approach by the end of the year.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
Leaders evaluate the impact of pupil premium expenditure on the achievement of disadvantaged pupils in detail. As a result eligible pupils are making better progress this year, but not yet catching up with their classmates.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
Senior leaders’ view of the school’s effectiveness is accurate, and they are very clear about where improvement is needed. The school improvement plan is comprehensive in its range of initiatives and challenging in the timescales for action. Many actions have been achieved already, and although they have not yet had a full impact on the quality of teaching or achievement the school is clearly heading in the right direction.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
The primary physical education and sport premium is used well to improve staff training and to provide sports clubs. Additional specialist staff have been engaged. Significantly more pupils are now involved in clubs and competitions. Sport, including competitive games, has a much higher profile than in the past.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
The school has welcomed the additional expertise available through the academy trust. This has enabled leaders to improve many aspects of its work, including their own skills.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
Pupils’ spiritual, moral and social development is promoted well. Their multicultural awareness has not, in the past, been such a strong element. British values are emphasised effectively through, for example, teaching pupils about local history and the British judicial system. As a result, pupils come to understand their rights and responsibilities as British citizens. Governors have been active in establishing workshops and other activities to build parental understanding of British values, in a climate of tolerance. All these activities are preparing pupils well for life in modern Britain.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
The school endeavours to ensure equality of opportunity for all. Discrimination in any form is not tolerated.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The school works hard to establish good links with parents, providing opportunities for them to learn about their children’s education. Links with other schools allow teachers to share good practice.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The school’s safeguarding arrangements meet current national requirements. They are well established and effective. All staff are trained to the expected levels.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The governance of the school: Governance is good. New members with relevant skills in education, management and finance have been recruited to the local governing body since the school became an academy. All governors are now better informed about the school’s work and the pace of improvement. They are closely involved in school improvement, monitor progress carefully and hold leaders to account more fully. Governors are firmly focused on one key aim: improving achievement through securing the best quality teaching. They evaluate the school’s performance in relation to schools nationally and have a good awareness of the quality of teaching. They have a good understanding of data about the performance of groups of pupils and make sure the management of teachers’ performance is effective and staff pay increases are closely linked to pupils’ achievement. They know what the school is doing to tackle any
p.5
The leadership and management are good
underperformance. Governors are committed to ensuring equality of opportunity, tackling discrimination and promoting good relationships. The local governing body, together with senior leaders, ensures that all statutory duties are met.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Most demonstrate positive attitudes to learning, particularly where the teaching is lively, challenging and engaging. Pupils take on jobs around the school and this gives them a strong sense of taking responsibility.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour observed during the inspection was impeccable. The school’s records show that there are occasional behavioural incidents, and a small number of pupils have difficulty in controlling their own behaviour. This is sometimes troubling for other pupils. However, the school uses well-established systems, supported by well-trained staff, to deal with such incidents. Exclusions are rare.
p.5
Behaviour
Attendance has improved steadily and is now broadly average. Effective systems ensure that pupils attend frequently. The education welfare office is resourceful in locating absent pupils and ensuring that their attendance improves.
p.5
Behaviour
Most pupils take a pride in what they are doing. However, their written work indicates that their enthusiasm sometimes wanes and in such cases the quality of their work deteriorates.
p.5
Safety
The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. The site and premises are secure, and both staff and pupils are protected by thorough risk assessments. Health and safety review procedures are also thorough. Staff are fully checked prior to appointment.
p.5
Safety
Pupils feel safe in school and have considerable confidence in the adults who look after them. They are well informed about road safety and are aware of the need to be alert when on their own.
p.5
Safety
The school works hard to ensure that pupils are equipped to keep themselves safe. Staff ensure that pupils are vigilant about spotting the dangers of internet abuse and cyber-bullying. Assemblies and personal, social and health education sessions promote pupils’ understanding of bullying well. Pupils are aware that bullying may take different forms. A few pupils feel that minor issues, including name-calling, do occur from time to time, but say that staff always respond if pupils feel concerned.
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Teachers in some year groups do not have sufficiently high expectations of what pupils can achieve. This affects the rate of pupils’ progress, particularly in mathematics. Sometimes, teachers do not take sufficient account of the full range of pupils or provide sufficient challenge for the most able. The pace of lessons is occasionally slow, and in such cases pupils have insufficient time to complete their work.
p.6
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Pupils’ written work is not always produced to a high standard. While there are examples of high-quality written work, particularly in Years 5 and 6, this is not consistent across the school.
p.6
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The school has effective systems to check pupils’ progress and provide additional support where it is needed. However, these are not consistently implemented across the school.
p.6
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Pupils’ work, particularly in writing and mathematics, is marked thoroughly in some classes, but less comprehensively in others. Older pupils often respond enthusiastically and at length to the guidance teachers provide.
p.6
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The pace of learning has improved in the last four terms. More effective teaching of phonics and early reading skills has supported better progress overall for the younger pupils. This is providing a much more secure foundation for later learning. However, some older pupils did not benefit from these recent improvements and still need to catch up rapidly in Years 5 and 6. In mathematics, pupils have not had a full range of challenging opportunities to sharpen their skills by solving problems in different subjects.
p.6
The quality of teaching requires improvement
With effective leadership, the support for disabled pupils, those who have special educational needs and disadvantaged pupils has improved, so that these pupils now make similar progress to their classmates. Overall, learning support staff are well deployed and effective in supporting learning. Pupils who have visual impairment achieve well because of the particularly good teaching and support they receive.
p.6
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Pupils make better progress when work is challenging. Pupils in Year 2 successfully extended their knowledge of food chains in science. The teacher introduced new information about herbivores and carnivores at regular intervals to keep pupils’ enthusiasm and interest alive. Pupils devised their own food chains, using technical vocabulary appropriately. The pace of learning was quick, helped by good levels of challenge for different groups of pupils.
p.6
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Homework contributes well to pupils’ learning. Teachers set tasks and mark them regularly.
p.6
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The attainment of Year 6 pupils in 2014 was below average overall, but low in mathematics and in English grammar, punctuation and spelling. Progress in mathematics was significantly weaker than in reading or, particularly, writing. Although attainment in mathematics in Year 6 is on track to be higher in 2015, pupils’ progress in mathematics in the current year remains slower than in reading or writing.
p.6
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The progress of disadvantaged pupils requires improvement. In 2014, the gap in attainment between disadvantaged Year 6 pupils and others in the school was around five terms in writing, four terms in mathematics and three terms in reading. They were six terms behind other pupils nationally in mathematics and between three and four terms behind in reading and writing. The figures were affected to some extent by the late arrival of several eligible pupils to Year 6 with relatively low prior attainment. School data show that some disadvantaged pupils are currently making more rapid progress than the others, particularly in Key Stage 1. Consequently the gaps in attainment are narrowing, but have not yet closed enough in Key Stage 2. Too many pupils, especially in Years 3 and 4, have poorly formed handwriting. This has a significant impact upon the overall quality of their work and is not improving rapidly enough.
p.6
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Raised expectations and a greater focus upon the systematic development of basic literacy skills, particularly reading, resulted in good progress and attainment in the early years in 2014. This year, children are continuing to achieve well.
p.7
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Improvements in the teaching of phonics in the early years have underpinned better outcomes in the Year 1 phonics screening check. The proportion of pupils reaching the nationally expected level in 2014 was above the latest national average. Greater priority is now given to the teaching of reading. Younger pupils mostly have secure skills in reading.
p.7
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Pupils in Years 1 and 2 are on track to attain broadly average standards in 2015. Most pupils in Years 3 to 6 are also making at least the progress expected. However, the rate of progress is generally more rapid in Years 5 and 6 than in Years 3 and 4. Current Year 6 pupils are already attaining at higher levels than in the last school year. This suggests that standards in 2015 are likely to be broadly average, with more consistently good progress, particularly in writing.
p.7
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The most able pupils are now being challenged more effectively than they were. Even so, their progress requires further improvement as they are not always stretched enough, particularly in mathematics.
p.7
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The needs of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs are accurately identified. They mostly receive appropriate support. In general, they make broadly similar progress to that of other pupils. However, the visually impaired pupils are better supported and make good progress.
p.7
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The achievement of the few Traveller pupils is variable. Some attend regularly and are working at least at the levels expected. Others have more erratic attendance and weaker basic skills in literacy and numeracy.
p.7
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Good leadership of the provision for pupils with visual impairment ensures that its work is closely monitored and evaluated. Almost all of the pupils involved achieve well, with some working at levels above those expected for their age. Achievement is sometimes adversely affected because pupils’ needs are complex, requiring frequent medical appointments. This also affects their overall levels of attendance.
p.7
The early years provision is good
The early years provision has improved more rapidly than the rest of the school. More effective teaching, particularly of language skills, together with sustained good leadership and management, have ensured that children make better progress. On leaving Reception, they are well prepared for entry to Year 1. By 2014, the proportion of children reaching standards typical for their age had improved to above average.
p.7
The early years provision is good
Most children enter Nursery with skill levels below those typical for their age. Staff focus particularly on promoting children’s personal, social, communication and language skills. This work is sustained when children enter Reception. Children, including those who have special educational needs, are challenged to achieve well.
p.7
The early years provision is good
Recent whole-school initiatives to improve the teaching of reading have been particularly effective. Children now acquire a secure knowledge of sounds and letters and basic skills in reading and writing. Although less extensive, they also have regular opportunities to undertake practical mathematical activities.
p.7
The early years provision is good
The early years is a stimulating environment to learn in and children are generally engaged well by the activities provided. These support their growing knowledge of the world and their personal development well. Children have positive attitudes to learning. They select resources with confidence and sustain concentration well.
p.7
The early years provision is good
Staff ensure that children behave well, although noise levels occasionally escalate when children are not engaged in directed or supervised activities. They are safe and well looked after. The school makes every effort to engage with parents and encourages their involvement in their children’s learning.
p.7
The early years provision is good
Staff know individual children well. Detailed checks and regular observations provide good information about children’s progress. These are recorded in thorough portfolios of evidence for each child.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing
p.9
Grade Judgement Description
to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.9
School details
Unique reference number 139566 Local authority Thurrock Inspection number 449862
p.10
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.10
School details
Type of school Primary School category Academy sponsor-led Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 387 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Dawn Mummery Headteacher Linda Moore Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01375 672066 Fax number 01375 641049 Email address l.moore.sps@stcleres.coop guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.11
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.11
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.11
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion