Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Longdendale Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
30 Mar 2015
- Inspectors verified
Janet Weston
- Early years AI-checked
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SK14 6JJ
- Name on report verified
Longdendale Pre-School
- URN verified
312346
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure that records are available for inspection, with particular regard to information about staff qualifications and the identity checks and vetting processes that have been completed on all staff p.2
- implement appropriate and effective arrangements for the supervision of staff; to monitor their work and create a culture of mutual support, coaching and training, in order to develop staff practices and promote the best interests of children p.2
- develop robust procedures for checking the ongoing suitability of all staff by ensuring staff are aware that they must disclose issues, such as, convictions, cautions, court orders, reprimands and warnings that may affect their suitability to work with children p.2
- monitor the quality of teaching effectively and ensure that staff receive the support, coaching and training they need in order to deliver high quality teaching across the provision, so that all children make consistently good progress. p.2
- develop effective procedures for self-evaluation, by seeking the views of staff, children and parents to identify strengths and targets for improvement. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“The leadership and management of the pre-school is inadequate.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 599
- shorter than usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Longdendale Pre-School Mottram Community Association, Community Centre, Church Brow, Mottram, Hyde, Cheshire, SK14 6JJ
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 30 March 2015 15 September 2009
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Good 2 How well the early years provision meets the needs of the range of children who attend Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the early years provision Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
The setting does not meet legal requirements for early years settings
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Maintenance and storage of staff records is not fully robust, to ensure the safe and efficient management of the setting. As a result, required information about details of Disclosure and Barring Services checks and staff qualifications is not available to view at inspection, so suitability cannot easily be verified. There is no programme in place for the supervision of staff, to actively monitor their work, create a culture of mutual support and set targets for professional development. There are unsatisfactory procedures in place for checking the ongoing suitability of staff. This compromises children's well-being. Monitoring of staff's practice is not yet successful in focusing strongly enough on the quality of teaching. Therefore, teaching is often variable and does not ensure a consistently rich learning experience for all children. The committee and manager have not ensured that Ofsted is notified of changes to the
p.1
This provision is inadequate
committee as part of their safeguarding measures. Self-evaluation is not effective enough. The views of staff, children and parents are not fully considered when making decisions about what needs to be improved.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children enjoy their time at the setting and play happily with each other and staff. Staff have developed positive relationships with parents and strong links with the local school, to support children in their next stage in learning. This means there is a shared approach to children's care and learning.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure that records are available for inspection, with particular regard to information about staff qualifications and the identity checks and vetting processes that have been completed on all staff implement appropriate and effective arrangements for the supervision of staff; to monitor their work and create a culture of mutual support, coaching and training, in order to develop staff practices and promote the best interests of children develop robust procedures for checking the ongoing suitability of all staff by ensuring staff are aware that they must disclose issues, such as, convictions, cautions, court orders, reprimands and warnings that may affect their suitability to work with children monitor the quality of teaching effectively and ensure that staff receive the support, coaching and training they need in order to deliver high quality teaching across the provision, so that all children make consistently good progress.
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
develop effective procedures for self-evaluation, by seeking the views of staff, children and parents to identify strengths and targets for improvement.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector checked evidence of the suitability and qualifications of staff working with the children, and the manager's procedures for self-evaluation. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager. The inspector observed activities and the quality of teaching. The inspector looked at children's assessment records and the planning documentation. The inspector spoke to members of staff, parents and children at appropriate times during the inspection and held meetings with the manager. The inspector had a tour of the pre-school.
p.2
who attend. This is inadequate
The pre-school offers an appropriate learning environment. Children have access to a range of activities that generally support their development across the areas of learning. Most staff employed by the pre-school are qualified to level 3 in childcare. However, they do not always use this knowledge to good effect. For example, they do not ensure planned activities and experiences match all children's needs and challenge them sufficiently. Furthermore, staff miss opportunities to extend children's learning further, by asking questions that encourage them to think more creatively and critically about their answers. In addition, staff who have attended training on the care and education of two year olds have not yet cascaded their knowledge to all staff, in order to make a positive impact. Staff undertake appropriate observations to establish children's achievements and use this information to track their progress.
p.3
inadequate
Management has not notified Ofsted of changes in committee members. Although the committee members do not work directly with the children, who are not therefore, put unduly at risk, this is a breach of the welfare requirements. Children are independent and are beginning to acquire the skills and abilities needed in preparation for their future learning and school. They independently select from the healthy choices of snack, which also gives children some control over this part of their day. Staff role model good health and hygiene practices as they encourage children to wipe their noses and wash their hands to help prevent the spread of infection. Children are beginning to show an awareness of how to behave. This is because staff discuss unwanted behaviours with the children. Therefore, children gain a basic awareness of what staff expect from them. Children benefit from fresh air, exercise and develop their physical skills as they attend the
p.3
inadequate
weekly forest-school activity. Parents commented they are happy with the care provided and that their children 'love the opportunity to experience the outside classroom'.
p.3
provision is inadequate
The leadership and management of the pre-school is inadequate. Management do not have a robust understanding of the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage. Records to verify all staff qualifications and identity and vetting checks are not available. Furthermore, staff have not been informed that they are expected to disclose anything that might affect their ongoing suitability to work with children. In contrast, all staff are clear about their duties and the procedures to follow should they have a concern about a child in their care. Staff are not supported in developing their practice. They do not receive regular supervisions. In addition, the quality of teaching and learning is not effectively monitored. This impacts negatively upon children's learning and progress. Furthermore, self-evaluation is in the early stages and does not yet take into account the views of all those associated with the pre-school. As a result, the pre-school has a weak capacity to
p.3
provision is inadequate
maintain or improve the quality of provision for children.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 312346 Local authority Tameside Inspection number 865020 Type of provision Sessional provision Registration category Childcare - Non-Domestic Age range of children 0 - 5 Total number of places 24 Number of children on roll 13 Name of provider Longdendale Pre-School Committee Date of previous inspection 15 September 2009 Telephone number 01457 764 499
p.4
Setting details
Longdendale Pre-School was registered in 2001. The pre-school employs four members of childcare staff. Of these, three hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3. The pre-school opens from Monday to Friday, term time only. Sessions are from 9am until 12noon. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.4
Setting details
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Setting details
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Setting details
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.5
Setting details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion