Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Apr 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dilip Kadodwala

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dilip Kadodwala

  • Postcode verified

    LN4 1LH

Page 2 of 4
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongimprovedeffectiverobustsuccessfulswiftlyclearlyclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
745
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Peter Beighton Principal Branston Community Academy Station Road Branston Lincoln LN4 1LH

p.1

Community Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 20 March 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Community Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Community Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, your four Vice-Principals and a group of governors including the Chair and Vice-Chair to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I visited some lessons and spoke with staff and students, particularly about teachers’ marking and students’ responses to it. The academy’s improvement and development plans were evaluated and the implications of the review of the academy’s use of the additional funding through the pupil premium were discussed. I scrutinised a range of documentation including information about students’ current achievement. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9156 Direct email : emma.norwood@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

You are acting swiftly and decisively to address the areas for improvement set out at the previous inspection. You are ably supported by a strong leadership team. Together you are making sure that strong systems to track students’ achievement are in place and that they are being used by staff to check the progress made by different groups of students. The academy is now able to provide robust information about the progress of students currently in the academy. You are expecting subject leaders to analyse students’ progress in greater depth, focusing sharply on the progress of disadvantaged students who are being supported through the pupil premium funding. Leaders clearly understand that some of these students are also more able and are taking action to tackle current underachievement.

p.2

Main findings

You have introduced a ‘5 minute class plan’ which asks teachers to identify the different groups of students they teach and how teaching is adapted for their needs. You are following this initiative up by raising expectations about the quality of leaders’ checks of learning. Leaders are making sure that, when they are in lessons, they are checking on how well the improved teachers’ planning is contributing to learning. Your line-management meetings are holding subject leaders to account more for the progress of different groups of students than was the case at the last inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Your academy improvement plan is suitable and addresses all of the issues from the last inspection. There are clear actions to improve the quality of leadership and management, teaching and the achievement of the academy’s disadvantaged students who are being supported through the pupil premium funding. Your revised development plan includes specific milestones to check regularly how well actions are leading to improvement. Governors are taking action to address the recommendations made from the timely external review of the use of the pupil premium funding. As a result, there is a separate action plan and a key priority is to improve the quality of checks made by leaders and governors on these students’ progress. You are suitably linking this action plan with the academy improvement plan so that there is a coherent approach to ensure successful implementation.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The academy is making good use of the resources offered by Lincolnshire Teaching School Alliance. An example of the impact of the support is the improved frequency and quality of teachers’ marking and students’ responses to it. Governors’ actions are swift to address the recommendations made by the external review of the use of the pupil premium funding. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Lincolnshire, the DfE Academies Advisers’ Unit and the Education Funding Agency.

p.2

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Chair of the Governing Body  Director of Children’s Services for Lincolnshire  Local authority  The Education Funding Agency  Academies Advisers

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion