Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Drew Crawshaw
- Postcode verified
OL11 5EF
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Following my visit to your school on 13 March 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. p.1
- Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection. p.1
- The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2014. p.1
- It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. p.1
- Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. p.1
- During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, students, governors, teachers and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. p.1
- I took the opportunity to scrutinise a range of other documents provided by the school. p.1
- One supply teacher has been employed on a temporary basis to cover a vacancy. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 785
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Stuart Pidgeon Headteacher Redwood Hudsons Walk Rochdale Lancashire OL11 5EF
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Redwood, Rochdale
Following my visit to your school on 13 March 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Redwood, Rochdale
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Redwood, Rochdale
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Redwood, Rochdale
ensure all adults are clear about how they can contribute to both students’ achievement and progress of the school overall.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, students, governors, teachers and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school action plan was evaluated. I took the opportunity to scrutinise a range of other documents provided by the school.
p.1
Context
One supply teacher has been employed on a temporary basis to cover a vacancy. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566850 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: dmccarrick@cfbt.com
p.1
Main findings
Leaders have acted quickly to improve the quality of teaching as the key route to raising standards across the school. Leaders have used effectively a staff survey to identify gaps in adults’ skills. Plans have been drawn up to provide training opportunities to plug the variances in expertise of all staff, for example in the teaching of students with autistic spectrum disorders. Records of observations of learning by a local authority school improvement officer show that there has been an improvement in the quality of teaching since the inspection.
p.2
Main findings
The accuracy of leaders’ view of the quality of teaching has improved compared with before the inspection. Leaders have worked well with the local authority to improve the quality of teaching across the school. Some whole school strategies, for example the use of signing, are not yet consistently well applied.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers’ planning for lessons has improved since the inspection because good and better practice has been shared across the school. Scrutiny of teachers’ planning showed that lessons are planned well to meet students’ specific needs. For example, one lesson plan described the use of a story board with one student along with access to sound effects and visual images with another. Leaders are aware that teachers’ plans should be improved further by ensuring teachers’ measures of students’ success are matched closely to each student’s specific needs.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have acted appropriately to raise staff moral across the school. The setting up of a ‘well-being’ team to identify and take action, on adults’ areas of concern, is welcomed by those staff spoken with. Leaders’ though, are not resting on their laurels. Leaders intend to boost staff involvement further by ensuring each adult is clear about how they can contribute to the action plan and therefore the school’s progress overall.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have reviewed the whole school behaviour policy. The school’s own data show that there has been a reduction in the number of behaviour incidents since the inspection. Leaders do not have well defined measures to judge the overall success of their actions to improve behaviour. Leaders are therefore not yet able to judge accurately how quickly the school is progressing in terms of students’ behaviour.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
Leaders have made effective use of their links with the local authority. The local authority’s support for leaders in their review of the quality of teaching has resulted in teacher’s planning more precisely to meet students’ specific needs. The local authority has supported the school with an external review of governance. This has included an audit of the skills of governors which in turn has resulted in governors being more able to hold leaders to account. Although records of governors meetings show that governors ask searching questions of leaders, it is too early to evaluate the impact of the changes to governance.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Rochdale and as below.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following:
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body Local authority
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion