Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Mohamed, Roda

Inspected 19 Mar 2015 · published 2 Apr 2015 · URN EY433147

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Aileen Finan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Mar 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Aileen Finan

  • Early years AI-checked

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • URN verified

    EY433147

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 75% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyconsistentlypositivecaringwarmconsistentkind
Criticismnot confidentweakineffectivenot consistentlyconcernnot effectivenot safe

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings316w−64
  • What needs to improve272w+44

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
575
shorter than usual (typical 907)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 7
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 26%What needs to improve 22%About the inspection 52%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 19 March 2015 20 April 2012

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 How well the early years provision meets the needs of the range of children who attend Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children Requires improvement The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the early years provision Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

The setting does not meet legal requirements for early years settings

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder has a weak understanding of the learning and development requirements for the Early Years Foundation Stage. This hinders her ability to meet children's individual needs and interests.  The childminder is not confident in her knowledge of the areas of learning. This has an impact on the effective delivery of the teaching and learning practices, therefore children do not achieve to the best of their abilities.  The childminder does not consistently use information gained from observations to plan children's next steps in learning.  Partnerships with parents and other providers children attend are ineffective. This is because the childminder has been unsuccessful in developing suitable strategies to engage them fully in order to complement children's learning.  The childminder is not wholly confident in finding suitable ways to help children develop an awareness of managing their own safety during play.

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder does not evaluate her provision well. Therefore, she has not identified areas for improvement to enhance the care she provides to children.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder has an appropriate awareness of child protection issues and understands the procedures to follow should she have a concern about a child in her care.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 update knowledge and understanding of the learning and development requirements in order to raise the quality of teaching and thereby promote children's readiness for school  provide children with a suitable range of adult-led and child-initiated experiences that reflect all areas of learning, taking into account their stage of development and interest, to effectively challenge them  conduct consistent observations and assessments of children's learning and use information gained from these to plan purposeful activities to meet children's next steps in learning.

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 develop strategies to work with parents and other providers that share the care of children, to consistently promote their care and development needs  extend children's awareness of safety throughout their daily routine and play  improve processes for evaluating the quality of the provision by taking into account the views of others to ensure positive outcomes for the children.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the interactions between the childminder and the children.  The inspector sampled the childminder's documentation and children's development journals.  The inspector spoke to the childminder about her understanding of the Early Years Foundation Stage, and how she seeks training and support.  The inspector spoke to the childminder about how she works with parents and other providers.  The inspector undertook a tour of the premises with the childminder and checked the safety measures to keep children safe.

p.2

who attend. This is inadequate

The childminder lacks a secure knowledge of how to meet the learning and development requirements. This has a negative impact on the quality of the provision she provides for children. The childminder meets with parents prior to children starting. However, she does not obtain a clear picture of children's prior attainments or their interests to help her plan for their individual needs. The childminder is not confident to use effective teaching skills to challenge children. Consequently, children do not engage in activities because they lack motivation to take part. The childminder provides children with an appropriate range of toys and resources and plans suitable activities. However, she directs children's play rather than letting children choose freely. The childminder carries out observations of children's learning, but does not use information from these to identify children's next steps. This

p.3

who attend. This is inadequate

means she does not prepare children well for the next stage in their learning.

p.3

requires improvement

The childminder is not confident in promoting children's awareness of safety. For example, as children jump off a low-level wall, she does not give explanations to help them consider why this may not be safe. The childminder is kind and caring and the children have a warm relationship with her. The childminder sufficiently promotes children's independence and self-care skills. She offers encouragement for children who are toilet training and ensures they wash their hands so they learn about suitable hygiene practices. The childminder encourages children to have regular opportunities to play outdoors, so they benefit from regular physical exercise and fresh air.

p.3

provision is inadequate

The childminder shows an adequate understanding of the safeguarding and welfare requirements. She implements suitable policies, procedures and conducts risk assessments to promote children's safety and well-being. However, the childminder does not evaluate the quality of her provision well to help her make continuous improvements. She has not established effective partnerships with parents and other providers that children attend. This means she is not able to provide consistency in meeting their learning and care needs. Nevertheless, the childminder does maintain some verbal feedback with parents by discussing children's progress. The childminder has attended relevant paediatric first-aid training, which equips her with suitable knowledge of what to do in an emergency.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY433147 Local authority Hillingdon Inspection number 816700 Type of provision Childminder Registration category Childminder Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 5 Number of children on roll 2

p.4

Name of provider

Date of previous inspection 20 April 2012

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 2011. She lives with her family in Hayes, in the London Borough of Hillingdon.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion