Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
PO8 8RZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- describes precisely for each action, the improvement that is expected to result refers to improvement in pupils’ achievement as the key measure of success, including for the checks governors make sets out ambitious timescales, including for complex aspects. p.1
- Sensibly, you are being receptive to advice and have already exchanged visits to one another’s schools with the headteacher from an outstanding school. p.2
- Additionally, the plan omits any reference to ensuring early years provision improves to be outstanding. p.2
- The local authority brokered the valuable partnership with an outstanding school. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 917
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Ruth Kenny Headteacher Hart Plain Infant School Hart Plain Avenue Cowplain Waterlooville Hampshire, PO8 8RZ
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 6 March 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to ensure the schools improvement planning:
p.1
School
describes precisely for each action, the improvement that is expected to result refers to improvement in pupils’ achievement as the key measure of success, including for the checks governors make sets out ambitious timescales, including for complex aspects.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, I met with you and the deputy headteacher and with other leaders. I toured the school with you, visiting all the classrooms and looking briefly at work pupils were doing. I met with the Chair of the Governing Body and three Tribal Kings Orchard 1 Queens Street Bristol, BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com other governors, and with a representative of the local authority. I examined a range of documents including the school’s improvement plans, information about pupils’ progress, records of the school’s checks on teaching, governing body minutes and local authority reports.
p.1
Context
There have been no staff changes since the inspection.
p.2
Main findings
You responded promptly to the inspection, showing determination to see immediate improvement in areas identified in the report. You challenged teachers to raise their expectations for pupils’ behaviour and the amount and quality of the work pupils produce. You also set out clear requirements for teachers’ marking and feedback to pupils, introducing new opportunities for pupils to respond. To support better progress in literacy and mathematics, you re-organised teaching groups.
p.2
Main findings
As a result, the behaviour issues identified in the report have already reduced, pupils are producing more work of a better quality, and teachers have started providing increasingly thoughtful feedback. Furthermore, in some pupils’ books I could see them increasingly responding to their teacher’s marking by writing a reply or correcting mistakes.
p.2
Main findings
I saw children in Year 1 working hard in their weekly “big write” activity – writing freely and at length, supported flexibly by the adults in the classroom. I saw Year 2 pupils fully engaged in purposeful reading activities, working successfully in small groups with or without adult support. The atmosphere throughout was calm and well-ordered. Pupils including boys showed a ready interest in their work, with one so keen to join his group that he jumped into his chair.
p.2
Main findings
Sensibly, you are being receptive to advice and have already exchanged visits to one another’s schools with the headteacher from an outstanding school. Evidently, your positive approach has inspired other leaders to accept the challenge of improving the school to be a good school as soon as possible. The staff team are clearly pulling together to achieve this.
p.2
Main findings
You undertake regular checks on teaching, wisely supporting the evaluations you make through observation with checks on pupils’ progress and the work in their books. However, this scrutiny does not focus well enough on the areas identified in the report and the records made are too brief to be helpful.
p.2
Main findings
You have devised a suitable improvement plan, which lists relevant actions. Helpfully, the sections of the plan match exactly the areas identified in the report. However, the plan does not describe well enough the precise improvement you expect to see resulting from planned actions, especially in terms of pupils’ achievement. Moreover, the time allowed for some fundamental improvements is too long, and “milestone” indicators of success are not sufficiently measurable. Additionally, the plan omits any reference to ensuring early years provision improves to be outstanding.
p.2
Main findings
The Chair of the Governing Body has a clear view of the need for well-paced, well- organised and sustained improvement. Individual governors have been allocated specific areas of improvement to check; governors’ visits are increasing in their frequency and purpose. Governors are firmly focused on looking at improvement in pupils’ achievement as the main indicator of success. I am pleased to see that governors are devising a detailed monitoring schedule, linked to the school’s improvement plan.
p.3
External support
The improvement of Hart Plain is a high priority for the local authority and senior advisers are monitoring the school’s improvement closely. The local authority provided relevant support promptly, and is committed to sustain this. The local authority brokered the valuable partnership with an outstanding school. English and mathematics consultants have already provided helpful training for leaders and staff. Suitable expertise in provision for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is being provided. However, it is disappointing that important weaknesses in the school’s improvement plan were not identified when the draft document was shared.
p.3
External support
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hampshire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion