Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Merebrook Infant School

Inspected 5 Mar 2015 · published 27 Mar 2015 · URN 131670

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Mike Capper (lead), James Hollinsley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Mar 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    James Hollinsley, Mike Capper

  • Early years AI-checked

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    MK4 1EZ

  • Name on report verified

    Merebrook Infant School

  • URN verified

    131670

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+24Mostly positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressconsistentlyeffectivelyhappyeffectiveoutstandingenjoysecure
Criticismrequires improvementnot alwaysinadequatenot consistentlyinconsistenciesunevenweakernot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings517w+38
  • What needs to improve2529w+21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,935
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 14%What needs to improve 66%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Early years provision Good 2

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Leaders and managers have not secured sufficient improvement in pupils’ achievement and the quality of teaching since the previous inspection.  The support given to teachers has not been effective enough to ensure that the quality of teaching is consistently good.  Pupils’ achievement requires improvement because progress is not consistently strong across the school.  In Year 1, teachers do not manage pupils’ behaviour consistently well. Pupils sometimes misbehave and are inattentive in lessons; consequently, they do not learn quickly.  There are occasions in both Years 1 and 2 where teachers give work that is too easy for the most able pupils.  Pupils make slower progress in writing than in reading because teachers do not always expect enough of pupils. Too little time is allowed for the teaching of writing.  Middle leaders are insufficiently involved in checking the quality of teaching. As a result, they do not play

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

a big enough part in driving improvement.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 Children get off to a good start in the early years provision. Teaching is good and children rapidly acquire new skills and knowledge. They behave well.  Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs learn well and are supported effectively.  Across the school, pupils make good progress in learning about letters and the sounds they make (phonics). This helps reading skills to improve quickly.  Pupils are happy and feel safe. They especially enjoy the wide range of clubs and visits that enrich learning.  Although staffing issues have slowed the pace of change, the headteacher and governing body have a good understanding of the priorities and are doing the right things to tackle them.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed pupils’ learning in 15 lessons, six of which were observed jointly with the headteacher or acting assistant headteacher. In addition, the inspectors made some short visits to lessons.  Discussions were held with pupils, staff, members of the governing body and a representative from the local authority.  The inspectors took account of the views of 24 parents who responded to the online questionnaire, Parent View. Inspectors also analysed the school’s own surveys of parental views and talked to parents at the start of the school day.  The inspectors observed the school’s work, heard pupils read, and looked at a number of documents, including: the school’s own information about pupils’ learning and progress; planning and monitoring documents; the school development plan; records relating to behaviour and attendance; safeguarding information; and health and safety documentation.

p.2

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors analysed 18 questionnaires from staff.

p.2

Inspection team

Mike Capper, Lead inspector Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This is a smaller-than-average-sized school.  Pupils come from a wide range of ethnic backgrounds, with around half being White British. Around a quarter of pupils speak English as an additional language with a wide range of home languages represented in this group.  Children in the early years provision are taught full time in one of two Reception classes.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs is close to the national average.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils supported though the pupil premium is slightly higher than the national average. The pupil premium is additional government funding provided to give extra support to pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and to children who are looked after.  A higher than average number of pupils join or leave school during each year.  The school is receiving support from the headteacher of Loughton First School, who is a local leader of

p.3

Information about this school

education.  The headteacher took up post shortly after the previous inspection. There have been several other staffing changes in Key Stage 1 since then.  The breakfast and after-school club is not managed by the school. It was inspected separately in February 2015.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve pupils’ behaviour and the quality of teaching, especially in Year 1, by ensuring that:  teachers in Year 1 set clear expectations for pupils’ behaviour and manage it more effectively  teachers give the most-able pupils work that consistently challenges them.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve pupils’ progress in writing by:  ensuring that teachers expect more of pupils in both the quality and quantity of written work  allowing more time for the teaching of writing in literacy lessons and other subjects.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen and accelerate the impact of leaders on raising standards by:  ensuring that the support and challenge given to teachers secure more rapid improvement in the quality of teaching  developing the role of middle leaders in driving improvement, especially in the quality of teaching.

p.3

The leadership and management require improvement

 Leaders and managers have not secured sufficient school improvement since the previous inspection. While the headteacher has a good understanding of the priorities and has secured improvement in some aspects of the school’s work, the pace of change has not been fast enough. It has been adversely affected by staffing issues, especially in Key Stage 1. This means that past improvements, including in pupils’ attainment, have not all been sustained into the current year.  The leadership of teaching and learning requires improvement. The headteacher and other leaders have not been successful in ensuring that teaching is consistently good. The headteacher has an accurate view of the quality of teaching and sets clear and challenging targets for teachers, but this has not been enough to iron out inconsistencies in quality.  The school has few experienced teachers. This means that responsibility for driving improvement is not

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

shared widely. Where there are middle leaders, such as teachers who are in charge of subjects, they are not sufficiently involved in checking the quality of teaching so that they can play a full part in securing the needed improvements.  The local authority is providing the right level of support to the school. It has recently brokered additional support from a local leader of education to help the headteacher in the absence of key staff. It is too early to see the impact of this.  Leaders do not ensure equality of opportunity because pupils’ progress is uneven. However, they successfully foster good relationships and tackle discrimination. They work closely with parents and are constantly striving to involve them fully in their children’s education. Most parents are happy with the school. They are particularly positive about the way that leaders provide a secure and happy environment for pupils from often challenging circumstances.

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

 The leadership and management of early years provision and of provision for disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs are good. Leaders of these aspects track the progress of pupils closely to check that all are doing well enough.  Additional government funding is used to good effect to help disadvantaged pupils fulfil their potential. Funding provides additional support both in and out of lessons and helps pupils to have full access to activities such as breakfast club and out-of-school visits.  The curriculum ensures that pupils make steady progress in developing skills in literacy and numeracy. It is enriched well by an exciting range of lunchtime clubs and visits which help pupils to enjoy school. A focus since the previous inspection on improving phonics teaching has been successful. A start has now been made to improving pupils’ writing skills. Leaders know that not enough time is allowed for the

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

teaching of writing so pupils have greater opportunity to write at length and their skills improve more quickly. They are already making adjustments to how literacy is taught to get a better balance of the time given to reading and writing.  Activities both in and out of lessons successfully promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. The school teaches a ‘Value of the Month’ and these are well understood by pupils. Older pupils show initiative by helping others without being asked to. Pupils are kind to each other, and by Year 2 are sociable and articulate. All leaders, including governors, successfully model respectful attitudes and tolerance for others. Pupils from different backgrounds get on well together. They understand that differences are to be celebrated rather than feared. Consequently, pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain.  The school makes good use of additional funding for physical education to promote healthy lifestyles and

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

pupils’ well-being. The use of specialist coaches to provide lunchtime activities, as well as additional training for teachers, is resulting in an increased number of pupils taking part in sporting activities. Governors carefully check that funding is being used to good effect.  Safeguarding arrangements meet statutory requirements. Leaders, including governors, carry out regular checks to ensure that pupils are kept safe and secure.  The governance of the school:  The governing body is well organised and checks the school’s provision for pupils systematically. It has offered appropriate challenge to leaders since the last inspection although this has not been sufficient to secure good achievement for all pupils. Governors receive a good amount of information from the headteacher and they do the right things to find out things for themselves. They have a good understanding of how well the school is performing in comparison with others because they compare

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

the school’s assessment information with national figures. The governing body knows that teaching is weaker in Year 1 and how this is being tackled. It ensures through performance management that only good teaching is rewarded financially. It is supporting the headteacher well in challenging weaker teachers to improve. Governors monitor closely the use of additional government funding to ensure that it is used to good effect to support eligible pupils. Governors have good systems for ensuring that the school promotes British values.

p.4

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.  Parents and staff are clear that while pupils behave well for much of the time this is not always the case. Inspectors confirm this view. Pupils in Year 1 do not always behave well enough in lessons because teachers and teaching assistants do not make expectations clear. Consequently, there are occasions when pupils are inattentive and naughty, which hinders their learning.  Pupils with behavioural, social and emotional difficulties are generally supported well across the school. Consequently, their occasionally challenging behaviour only rarely disturbs the learning of others.  In early years provision and Year 2, pupils’ behaviour is good most of the time. In these classes, pupils are keen to learn and are well motivated. They have positive attitudes towards learning and work together happily, supporting each other sensitively when needed.  Pupils enjoy school and play together happily. Across the school, pupils keenly talk to visitors. Their

p.5

Behaviour

conduct at break times and when moving around school is sensible and responsible. Pupils who arrive during the school year are very clear that they settle quickly because ‘everyone is so friendly’.  Older pupils keenly take responsibility. The school council has a beneficial effect on school life. It helps pupils to contribute their own ideas to school improvement.

p.5

Safety

 The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good.  Parents agree that their children are well cared for. One pupil summed this up by saying, ‘The grown-ups look after us really well.’  Pupils have a good understanding for their age of staying safe online. They can explain how to avoid dangers when outside school. For example, pupils in Year 2 are very clear about ‘Stranger Danger’ and what to do if they have a concern.  School records show that there is very little bullying. Pupils say that they occasionally ‘fall out’ but they are very confident that when this does occur it is dealt with immediately.  School leaders have been thorough in ensuring pupils and their families understand the importance of attending school regularly. This has resulted in attendance being above the national average.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teaching has not enabled enough pupils to make at least good progress over time. The effectiveness of teaching is too variable across year groups, being stronger in early years provision and Year 2 than in Year 1.  In Year 1, teachers and other adults do not always manage pupils’ behaviour well enough. They do not make their expectations clear and they allow pupils to be inattentive without tackling the problem. Teachers too willingly accept work from pupils that is not their best; moreover, they do not engage and motivate them fully.  Across the school, teachers do not give the most able pupils work that enables them to achieve consistently well. In writing, teachers in both Years 1 and 2 do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve. Consequently, the quality of work is patchy and the rate at which writing skills improve is not rapid enough.  The teaching of reading and mathematics is more effective. Teachers are successful at meeting pupils’

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

differing needs, especially in Year 2; this helps them to make faster progress. The teaching of phonics is particularly strong. Skills are introduced systematically and pupils improve skills quickly. All staff, including teaching assistants, have been well trained in teaching phonics, and do so effectively most of the time.  In Year 2, teachers typically take account of what pupils already know to help with planning what to teach next. Teachers provide more demanding work than in Year 1. They make good use of resources such as interactive whiteboards to bring subjects alive and to help pupils understand what is being taught. Pupils’ behaviour is managed well in Year 2. Teachers make effective use of praise to motivate pupils to try their best and to do well.  Teachers give useful support to disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs both in and out of lessons. Again, progress is better in Year 2 than Year 1 because learning is not disturbed by

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

misbehaviour. A skilled teaching assistant works well with pupils who speak English as an additional language, helping them to improve their spoken English quickly. New arrivals are quickly assessed and supported.  While most parents are happy with the quality of teaching, this is not true of all who responded to the online questionnaire, Parent View. Parents support the school well by hearing their children read and helping them with homework.

p.6

requires improvement

 Pupils’ achievement requires improvement because progress, including for pupils who arrive during the school year, is not consistently strong across the school.  While attainment has been rising and is broadly average by the end of Year 2, in Year 1, work does not build well on the good start made in the early years provision. Pupils’ skills and knowledge improve too slowly in Year 1 because teaching is not good enough. Consequently, the school is over-reliant on securing more rapid progress in Year 2 to ensure that all pupils fulfil their potential before they move on to their next school.  Pupils’ attainment is higher in reading and mathematics than in writing. Pupils achieve less well in writing because teachers do not always expect enough of the pupils. In addition, pupils do not write at length regularly enough in English lessons or to support learning in other subjects.  In both Year 1 and Year 2, the most able pupils make uneven progress. This is because they are not

p.6

requires improvement

always given work that challenges them fully.  Some aspects of pupils’ achievement are strong. Reading skills improve quickly because pupils develop a secure understanding of phonics. Attainment in the national phonics screening checks at the end of Year 1 has been improving. A broadly average proportion of pupils reached or exceeded the expected level in phonics in 2014.  Pupils who speak English as an additional language reach the same levels of attainment as others by the end of Year 2 in English and mathematics. They make good progress in learning spoken English, even if they have been in school for only a short time.  Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs generally achieve well. Teaching effectively meets their needs and helps them to make good progress.  The school has a good track record for closing the gap between the attainment of disadvantaged pupils and others. In 2014, the gap was much smaller than that found nationally, with disadvantaged pupils

p.6

requires improvement

reaching higher attainment in mathematics than other pupils in the school and all pupils nationally. In 2014, the attainment of disadvantaged pupils was broadly similar to that of all pupils nationally and in the school in reading and writing. However, as with other pupils, the progress of disadvantaged pupils in the current year is uneven because of inconsistencies in the quality of teaching in Key Stage 1.

p.6

is good

 Effective leadership of the early years provision ensures that children’s achievement and the quality of teaching are good. One reason that achievement is stronger than elsewhere in the school is because the early years has been unaffected by staff turnover.  When children start school, only a minority are working at a level of development that is typical for their age. From these comparatively low starting points, children quickly acquire new skills and knowledge. By the end of the Reception year, attainment is broadly average.  Teaching is successful at meeting differing needs. Work is engaging and fun and it motivates children to try hard and do well. Children are given calm and sensitive support, with work taking good account of what they already know so that there is generally good challenge, including for the most able.  Early reading and mathematical skills are taught effectively. This is reflected in the good progress children

p.6

is good

make in their understanding of phonics. Progress in writing is not quite as rapid as children do not write enough in, for example, phonics lessons.  Teachers give good support to disabled children and those who have special educational needs and they make good progress. Children who speak English as an additional language also achieve well. Daily opportunities to talk with and listen to each other, and to discuss ideas, make a significant contribution to children’s language development.  Both the indoor and outdoor spaces are used well to support learning. Resources are easily accessible to the children and are well chosen to stimulate interest. They contribute well to children’s spiritual, moral, social and cultural development by, for example, helping them to celebrate different cultures or the wonders of nature. This is seen to good effect in the children’s delightful and thoughtful responses to

p.6

is good

newly hatched chickens.  Children behave well and are keen to learn. They feel safe and get on well together. There is a happy atmosphere in class, with children supporting each other sensibly and sharing ideas.  Leaders have a good understanding of the main priorities for improvement. They are tackling them well by, for example, building in more opportunities for children to write throughout the day. Information on children’s progress is recorded diligently in books and folders and is shared regularly with parents so that they can play a full part in supporting their children.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 131670 Local authority Milton Keynes Inspection number 453594

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–7 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 156 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Denise Kelly Headteacher Cheryl Johnson Date of previous school inspection 28 February – 1 March 2013 Telephone number 01908 522876 Fax number 01908 521534 Email address office@merebrookschool.co.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion