Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Seahouses Primary School

Inspected 4 Mar 2015 · published 27 Mar 2015 · URN 122214

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Belita Scott

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Mar 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Belita Scott

  • Early years AI-checked

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NE68 7UE

  • Name on report verified

    Seahouses First School

  • URN verified

    122214

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressexemplaryimprovedvery wellhighly effectiveeffectivelyhigh expectationsoutstanding
Criticismrequires improvementpoornot alwayslackinadequatenot effectivelyinconsistentdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings903w+59
  • What needs to improve1959w−31

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,820
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
27 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 25%What needs to improve 54%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Seahouses First School Main Street, North Sunderland, Seahouses, Northumberland, NE68 7UE

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Early years provision Good 2

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Too few pupils by the end of Year 2 attain the higher levels in reading, writing and mathematics.  Teaching requires improvement because pupils in Years 2, 3 and 4 do not make enough progress as they move through the school.  Teachers are sometimes not ambitious enough for pupils and do not always set work at the right level of difficulty for them, especially the most able. Too often, work is unmarked and pupils do not know how to make it better.  Teachers do not have good subject knowledge about the new National Curriculum because they have not had high-quality professional development.  Teachers and teaching assistants do not routinely make best use of their time in lessons to support pupils’ learning.  Middle leaders do not play a big enough part in school improvement. Their impact on improving pupils’ achievement is limited.  Senior leaders and governors do not ensure that the actions within the school’s improvement plans

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

drive the school forward with sufficient urgency. Plans also lack detail about how progress will be checked.  Governors do not routinely challenge the school about the progress that the most able pupils and disadvantaged pupils make.  There is no whole-school system to record incidents of poor behaviour so any trends or patterns are not understood or addressed.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 Provision for children in the early years is good. Communication between school and home is exemplary. As a result, children make good progress.  Safeguarding is secure. Pupils enjoy school. They behave well and feel safe.  The school provides well for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.  The teaching of phonics (the sounds that letters represent) and early reading skills is good in the early years and Year 1.  Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress from their individual starting points.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspector observed teaching and learning in six lessons, one of which was a joint observation with the headteacher.  The school’s work was observed together with a number of documents including information about pupils’ attainment and progress, safeguarding, behaviour and leaders’ monitoring of teaching.  In addition, the inspector looked at work in pupils’ books with the two middle leaders and also records of the learning of the children in the early years.  The inspector held discussions with school leaders, teachers, two representatives of the local authority and the Chair of the Governing Body.  Formal and informal discussions took place with groups of pupils and the inspector listened to pupils read.  The inspector took account of the 20 responses to Ofsted’s online parent questionnaire, Parent View, the school’s most recent survey of parents on the school’s website and held informal discussions with parents

p.2

Information about this inspection

at the beginning of the school day.  The inspector took account of the 10 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.2

Inspection team

Belita Scott, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This first school is much smaller than an average-sized primary school.  The proportion of disabled pupils or pupils who have special educational needs is smaller than average.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils supported by the pupil premium funding has fallen year-on-year and is half the national average. The pupil premium is additional funding to support pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and those looked after by the local authority.  The majority of pupils are of White British heritage and speak English as their first language.  The school is part of the Alnwick Partnership of Schools. Northumberland County Council is currently consulting on the reorganisation of the Alnwick Partnership of Schools.  Children in the early years attend full-time provision in the Reception class and part-time provision in the Nursery class.  There is an onsite pre-school facility, Busy Bees Seahouses CIC Ltd. It was judged to be good at the time

p.3

Information about this school

of its last inspection. The inspection report can be found at http://reports.ofsted.gov.uk

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen the impact that leaders, at all levels, have on raising achievement in reading, writing and mathematics for all groups of pupils by: - increasing the rigour of the school’s action planning for improvement and introducing regular checks on progress - checking on pupils’ progress in lessons regularly and more rigorously - developing the skills of middle leaders so that they are able to use a wide range of evidence (including pupils’ work in books) to identify ways for pupils to improve their learning - deploying teachers and teaching assistants appropriately in lessons so they are best placed to support pupils’ learning and progress more effectively - ensuring that governors routinely and rigorously check on the performance of disadvantaged and more able pupils.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching so that it is consistently good or better and leads to high achievement for all groups of pupils by ensuring that: - teachers have high expectations of what all pupils, irrespective of individual differences, can achieve - teachers plan appropriately challenging work, especially for the most able pupils - all staff increase their subject knowledge through high-quality professional development, especially in relation to the increased demands of the new National Curriculum for mathematics - all pupils’ work is marked regularly and provides pupils with a sharp understanding of how to improve it - teachers keep their pupils’ targets up to date and share these with pupils so they know the next step to improve their learning. - introduce a whole school system to record incidents of poor behaviour in order to identify and address any trends or patterns so that these can be dealt with.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.3

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The school’s leaders have failed to ensure that achievement is good enough, especially for the most able pupils.  Additional funding to support disadvantaged pupils has not ensured that all of these pupils make good or better progress.  Leaders have implemented an assessment system to track regularly the attainment and progress of pupils. The checking of the standard of pupils’ work within the Alnwick Partnership of Schools, including Seahouses Middle School, has ensured accurate assessment information for each child. However, this is not being used by teachers in classrooms to drive improvement.  Pupils and parents told inspectors that there are occasional incidents of poor behaviour, for example name-calling. The school has not implemented a system to record all such incidents. This means that any trends and patterns remain unidentified and no coordinated action is taken to remedy matters.  The early years provision is much improved since the previous inspection and is now good.

p.4

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The role that middle leaders have in monitoring attainment and progress in the subjects they lead requires improvement. Although some monitoring has taken place, it does not regularly identify any strengths and areas for development. Individual subject action plans do not contribute to whole-school planning.  Pupil progress targets which are set by leaders lack ambition. Similarly, targets that are set in teachers’ performance management are not ambitious either, because they are not precise enough to hold teachers to account for their work.  Leaders’ judgement of the standard of teaching in the school is inaccurate. No areas for improvement have been highlighted for any member of staff and none involve any observations of the teaching of mathematics.  The quality of the curriculum requires improvement because teaching staff are not knowledgeable enough about the demands of the new National Curriculum. In mathematics, there are not enough opportunities

p.4

The leadership and management requires improvement

for pupils to use their skills and knowledge to solve problems and there are too many pages of repetitive and unchallenging calculations in workbooks. Pupils do not use their mathematical knowledge and skills often enough in other areas of the curriculum.  The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural experiences effectively; it ensures that good relations are fostered and that discrimination in all its forms is rejected. It prepares pupils for life in modern Britain well. Pupils have respect and tolerance for those from other faiths and cultures. They understand the democratic process through, for example, question and answer sessions with their local member of parliament. However, equality of opportunity is not yet good because the most able pupils and pupils entitled to support through the pupil premium funding do not always make the progress of which they are capable.  The primary physical education and sport funding has been used effectively to increase the range of

p.4

The leadership and management requires improvement

sporting opportunities for pupils and the expertise of teaching staff through the work of a specialist coach who works within the Alnwick Partnership of Schools.  Historically, the local authority has not challenged the school robustly about the standards pupils reach and the progress pupils make. Recently, following the appointment of a new School Improvement Partner, the level of challenge has improved. He has carried out checks in the school and found that the most able pupils are not making good progress, teaching is inconsistent and additional adults are not always deployed effectively. The local authority’s support in improving the provision in the early years has resulted in better teaching and higher pupil outcomes.  The governance of the school: - The governing body has not made sure that teaching is good and that all of the pupils make the progress of which they are capable. - While governors understand the need to link teachers’ performance and pay progression, this is not

p.4

The leadership and management requires improvement

carried through in practice. - The governing body has an inflated view of the quality of teaching in some areas of the school and this hinders their work in holding staff to account. - Members of this very small governing body have an inaccurate overview of the performance of the school at the end of the early years, Key Stage 1 and Year 4. - Governors have not challenged the school effectively about the progress that the most able pupils make. Similarly, the governors could not explain the impact that the pupil premium funding has had on outcomes for eligible pupils. - Governors ensure that statutory safeguarding requirements are met.

p.4

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils are polite, considerate and welcoming towards other pupils and adults in school. Pupils are attentive in lessons and are eager to learn. On occasions, when not sufficiently challenged, their concentration wanes and they do not complete enough work and do not make good progress.  Pupils are happy in this caring, harmonious, community school. Pupils behave well in the playground, corridors and dining hall. Occasional incidents of poor behaviour are dealt with swiftly and appropriately by adults in the school.  Pupils are very proud of their school. They are eager to take on roles of responsibility and take pride in being elected as a sports leader or member of the school council.

p.5

Safety

 The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good.  The school fully meets all safeguarding requirements.  Pupils and parents told the inspector that pupils are safe in school and well-supported by the school. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe from everyday hazards through work completed in school and by visits from outside agencies such as the fire brigade.  E-safety is strong. Posters, prepared by the pupils, are placed throughout the school and outline the rules and regulations for being safe when using modern technology.  Pupils are knowledgeable about the different forms that bullying can take. They say that bullying hardly ever happens, but when it does it is sorted out very quickly by the adults in school.  Pupils are eager to come to school and are always punctual. Attendance, which is now broadly average, improved strongly following assertive action taken by school leaders.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teachers have low expectations of the most able pupils. The work that is set for pupils in mathematics, especially the most able, does not provide sufficient challenge. Pupils spend too long repeating calculations that they know how to do. They do not have enough opportunities to apply their skills to solve problems, use their mathematical reasoning skills or develop their knowledge of the subject.  The quality of teachers’ marking does little to help pupils know how to improve their work. Some pupils’ writing is unmarked and, as a result, this lack of feedback is limiting their progress. The quality of the presentation of their work has declined. Pupils make better progress in classes where teachers follow the school’s marking policy and give pupils a chance to respond to their marking and improve their work.  There is a whole-school system for target setting in writing but this is not used effectively by all staff

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

because some teachers do not change these targets frequently enough. This results in pupils having targets they have already comfortably reached with no guidance of what they have to do next to make good progress.  Additional adults are not always used effectively. Qualified teachers sometimes sit and watch other teachers deliver lessons to larger classes of children. This is not a good use of their time and limits the support which pupils receive.  The teaching of phonics in the early years and Year 1 is good. Pupils have a secure knowledge of phonics. This enables them to read new words and correct their own mistakes. The teaching of reading is good and is very well supported by parents at home. Pupils enjoy reading. They read with expression and are able to answer questions about the book they are reading currently. This good start is not extended well enough into Years 2, 3 and 4 where underachievement is widespread, particularly for the most able.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Pupils present their work very well in mathematics as adults insist that pupils write one digit in one square. Presentation is not as good in the pupils’ writing and many of the older pupils do not write in the joined handwriting script that they have been taught.  There is a notable difference in the provision for disabled children and those with special educational needs because teaching assistants provide well-organised and well-targeted support. As a result, these pupils make good progress.

p.5

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Achievement requires improvement because progress is inconsistent between key stages and progress for the most able pupils is not good enough.  In 2014, pupils’ attainment in the Year 2 national assessments for reading, writing and mathematics was broadly average, having declined from previous years. None of the highest-achieving children at the end of the early years in 2012 reached the highest level at the end of Key Stage 1 in 2014. The most able pupils do not achieve as well as they should because the work set does not challenge or inspire them.  Disadvantaged pupils were three terms behind their peers in writing and one term behind their peers in reading and mathematics by the end of Key Stage 1. The pupil premium funding is not well used to support this group of pupils in all classes. They do, however, make good progress in the early years and in Year 1 but not enough in Years 2, 3 and 4.

p.6

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Pupils make good progress in the acquisition of phonics and early reading skills in the early years and Year 1. Pupils enjoy reading and parents support the school well by listening to children read at home. The proportion of pupils who reached the required level in the 2014 phonics screening check was above the national average and improved significantly from the previous two years.  Those pupils who are disabled or have special educational needs make good progress because their individual needs are met. Pupils develop confidence and skills through well-focused one-to-one support from school staff, for example in reading, and from the additional professionals arranged by the school.

p.6

The early years provision is good

 Provision in the early years was a key area for improvement at the time of the previous inspection. Provision in the early years is now good.  The early years leader, who is also the school’s senior teacher, leads the area well, plans effectively and takes into account children’s interests. As a result, she ensures the children make consistently good progress through good teaching and accurate assessment. She demonstrates a keen understanding of their future learning needs. From their different, but generally slightly below typical starting points, the large majority of children make good progress. Children settle very quickly into the early years and make good progress because of the very effective transition arrangements that have been developed and implemented by the leader.  Children make good progress in the acquisition of writing skills because of the varied and plentiful opportunities for them to write both indoors and outdoors. Progress is not as good in the development of

p.6

The early years provision is good

skills in number. Although there are numerous number-related resources provided in the early years, children do not choose to use them. In addition, there are insufficient opportunities for children to have a go at problem solving.  The school has developed a highly effective partnership with parents. Parents know what their children are doing in school, how well their children progress and what their children will learn next. Parents are keen to get involved. Every parent reads with their child at home, every parent attends parent/teacher consultation meetings and every parent contributes regularly to their child’s learning journal.  There is a joyous atmosphere in the early years. Behaviour is exemplary because the adults constantly model high expectations and children strive to meet them. At all times children are kept safe.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 122214 Local authority Northumberland Inspection number 449656

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school First School category Community Age range of pupils 4–9 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 80 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Roslyn Slater Headteacher Margaret Ayden Date of previous school inspection 16 November 2009 Telephone number 01665 720444 Fax number 01665 720444 Email address admin@seahousesfirst.northumberland.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion