Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Busy Bees Pre-School

Inspected 3 Mar 2015 · published 26 Mar 2015 · URN 206126

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Mar 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Joanne Mary Smith

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DE22 2HE

  • Name on report verified

    Busy Bees Pre-School

  • URN verified

    206126

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Early yearsGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 52% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiserapid progressvery wellclearmake good progressstrong relationshipsrobustconsistentlysettled
Criticismnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings408w+71
  • What needs to improve103w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
501
shorter than usual (typical 703)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 29%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 64%

Full report text

Busy Bees Pre-School Scout Hall, Off Woodlands Road,Allestree, Derby, Derbyshire, DE22 2HE

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 3 March 2015 13 April 2011

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Previous inspection: Good 2 How well the early years provision meets the needs of the range of children who attend Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the early years provision Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The setting meets legal requirements for early years settings

p.1

This provision is good

 Children are active learners. They are interested in the good range of equipment and activities on offer. Children of all ages sit and listen well at story time and join in enthusiastically with rhymes and songs.  Staff have a very clear understanding of the learning and development needs of their key children. They actively adapt activities to suit children's needs and interests. All children make good progress. Those who need extra support make rapid progress.  Children are very well settled into the setting. They form strong relationships with staff and receive good levels of individual care and attention, especially when they seek comfort from an adult.  Robust policies and procedures to safeguard and protect children's welfare are in place, understood and routinely followed by adults. Children are cared for in a safe and secure environment.

p.1

It is not yet outstanding because:

 In conversation and discussion with children staff do not always use the opportunity to question and extend children's thinking and language development well enough.  One-to-one meetings between the owner and staff are not a fully established part of the staff development process. They do not include feedback on all the information held about the quality and impact of staff's work on children's learning and development.  Parents contribute to the self evaluation of the setting at a late stage in the process. They are not regularly involved in the ongoing evaluation of the setting.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 develop how adults use opportunities to ask children questions to extend and challenge their thinking so that it is consistently good in all types of activity  improve staff one-to-one meetings with leaders and managers so that they include all the monitoring information available to managers and give staff a clearer understanding of their progress and development  provide more regular opportunities for parents to offer ideas and share their views about the quality of the setting so that they are more involved in the setting's self evaluation process.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed activities in the playroom, the outdoor play area, the large Scout hall and the garden.  The inspector held meetings with the owner and the manager.  The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector took account of the views of parents spoken with on the day of the inspection.  The inspector looked at planning documentation, evidence of the suitability of staff working with the children, a range of other documentation, including policies and procedures, and children's records.

p.2

who attend. This is good

Staff accurately assess what children know, understand and can do. They use assessment well to identify highly relevant aspects of development on which to focus their work with individual children. Staff are well-qualified and experienced. They have a secure understanding of how children learn and use their knowledge well to adapt activities and resources to meet the changing needs and interests of children. Use of opportunities to expand and develop children's thinking and language development is inconsistent. Staff often skilfully ask questions and allow children time to consider their responses. At times, however, they move on too quickly and miss opportunities to ask children more challenging questions, such as what they think a conker is or what would happen if they planted a conker. When staff assess that a child may need extra support they actively engage with parents and other professionals. They are not complacent. When an

p.3

who attend. This is good

assessment identifies specialist support is not necessary, staff devise detailed plans for the child to speed progress to close any gaps in the child's development.

p.3

good

Careful attention is given to helping children to prepare for starting at the setting and for moving on either to school or nursery school. Children quickly become familiar with routines in the setting and understand what is expected of them. When staff clap their hands, for example, children know they need to be still and listen. Children behave very well. Minor disagreements are dealt with sensitively. Adults help children to understand the impact of their actions, and support them to negotiate and share equipment. Children move freely between indoors and outdoors, and enjoy playing in the outdoor area. In the separate garden children explore and investigate the natural environment. They delight in finding conkers, cones, and worms, using magnifying glasses with skill. In poor weather some children miss out on these experiences because access to this area is limited to children who have suitable footwear for muddy conditions.

p.3

provision is good

A good range of clear and relevant policies and procedures is in place to support staff to meet the care, wellbeing and learning needs of children. Leaders and managers have well- established systems to monitor the quality and impact of teaching in the setting. The information gathered from monitoring is not used well enough in one-to-one meetings with staff to help them gain a clear understanding of their own development needs. Monitoring information is used well to make changes and improvements to what is provided for the children, and staff contribute to improvement discussions on an ongoing basis. Detailed information is given by parents to the setting before children start to attend and parents receive regular, accurate information about their child's development and progress. They are not fully involved in the ongoing review and evaluation of the setting, their views are mainly sought towards the end of the annual process limiting their

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 206126 Local authority Derby, City of Inspection number 1003607 Type of provision Full-time provision Registration category Childcare - Non-Domestic Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 24 Number of children on roll 56 Name of provider Jane Bailey and Sharon Batchelor Partnership Date of previous inspection 13 April 2011 Telephone number 01332 510202

p.4

Setting details

Busy Bees Pre-School was registered in 1999. It is a privately owned provision and operates from the annexe of the Scout headquarters, which is situated to the rear of the main building in Allestree, Derby. It is in receipt of funding for the provision of free early education to children aged two-, three- and four-years old. It is open from 9.15am to 3.15pm each weekday during school term times. The setting employs 11 staff to work with the children. Ten staff hold an appropriate early years qualification and the owner has a BA (Honours) degree in Early Childhood Studies and Early Years Professional Status.

p.4

Setting details

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Setting details

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Setting details

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.5

Setting details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion