Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Julie Winyard
- Postcode verified
NR10 3LF
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 680
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
John Marshall-Grint Headteacher St Faith's CofE Primary School 25 Manor Road Horsham St Faith Norwich NR10 3LF
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 5 March 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the third monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Primary School
maintain the highly effective leadership of the school until a substantive headteacher is appointed.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the interim headteacher, other leaders, pupils the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9156 Direct email : emma.norwood@serco.com
p.1
Context
Since the last visit, one teacher has returned to the school. Two support staff members have left the school and two more have joined. The school will federate with two local schools in April.
p.2
Main findings
Since the last monitoring inspection you have made sure that pupils are making good progress from their starting points. You and senior leaders have monitored the quality of teaching in all classes and given good advice which teachers and teaching assistants have taken on board. Teachers think about how well lessons have enabled pupils to learn new skills, and they use this accurate assessment to plan the next steps in learning. As a result teaching and learning are greatly improved from the last section 5 inspection.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils really enjoy their lessons and, because of this, concentrate and try their hardest. This is evident in better quality writing because they are able to look carefully at their own work and make improvements. Also, teachers make sure they give enough time for pupils to make further improvements after their work is marked. In mathematics older pupils are able to explain why they have used a particular method to work out a problem and this approach is developing across the school.
p.2
Main findings
You have successfully driven whole-school improvement by enabling staff to work as an effective team. Middle leaders are very clear about the amount of progress pupils make in their subjects and can illustrate their views effectively. Action plans are targeted on next steps for whole school improvement. Governors have played a much stronger role in monitoring the quality of education the school provides. As a result of frequent and focussed visits they are much better informed of how well pupils are getting on. This enables them to provide effective challenge to you and other school leaders.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school has drawn well on the support offered by the local authority. The Improvement Board has made sure that the school has access to a range of good advice and development. Although the school is now federated with two other local schools, a substantive headteacher has not been appointed. The local authority is aware of this and has undertaken to make sure the school maintains its current leadership capacity until a substantive headteacher is in post. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Norfolk and the Diocese of Norwich.
p.2
Her Majesty’s Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following:
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Chair of the Governing Body Local authority Director of Children’s Services for Norfolk Diocese of Norwich
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion