Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 Mar 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    HP1 3DT

Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh qualitypositiverigorousimprovingsuccessfullyeffectivelyconsistent
Criticismuncleartoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
928
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Patricia Bandle Headteacher Gade Valley Junior Mixed Infant and Nursery School Gadebridge Road Hemel Hempstead HP1 3DT

p.1

Mixed Infant and Nursery School

Following my visit to your school on 9 March 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Mixed Infant and Nursery School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Mixed Infant and Nursery School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Mixed Infant and Nursery School

 reduce the number of targets in the school action plan and ensure that for each target there is measurable success.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you and the deputy headteacher, a group of year six pupils, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school action plan was evaluated. A tour of the school, accompanied by senior leaders, was undertaken and all the classrooms were visited. Pupils’ work in writing and mathematics from Year 2 and Year 6 was scrutinised. A review of current school information, the outcomes of recent observations of the quality of teaching and reports by the school’s improvement partners were reviewed. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9158 Direct email : rachel.dayan@serco.com

p.1

Context

Since the recent inspection the school has appointed a Year 3 teacher and a higher level teaching assistant.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils in most classes are now making faster progress than was seen at the time of the inspection. You and your senior colleagues have introduced a new writing scheme across the school. A staff training focus on writing through paired observations has enabled teachers to reflect on their own lessons and to improve the way they teach writing. Teachers like the new scheme because it gives useful structure to support their teaching of writing. This has had a positive impact on the quality of work the pupils are producing and gives far greater opportunities for extended writing. Pupils in Year 6 speak of teachers’ higher expectations and about there being more challenge and interest in these lessons. The impact of this is also evident from pupils’ books which show an increasing confidence in their writing skills.

p.2

Main findings

Rigorous monitoring of the quality of teaching, by yourself and your senior team, is now more focussed on pupil progress and the impact that teaching is having on developing phonics and writing skills. You are now using a combination of lesson observations, discussions with pupils, looking at pupils’ work and progress information together, and these indicate that the quality of teaching is steadily improving.

p.2

Main findings

The school has taken part in some whole-school training on the teaching of phonics. This has had an impact on the way that teachers now plan their lessons. All teachers have had the opportunity to observe some effective phonics teaching through a coaching programme and understand the importance of raising the profile of phonics across the school.

p.2

Main findings

The quality of marking within the school is steadily improving. Teachers are now providing more consistent advice and feedback. Reflection time is now built into each day so the pupils can read though the helpful comments they have been given about their work and make any necessary improvements; however teachers do not check that pupils always provide high quality responses. Pupils feel that their teachers are giving them more helpful advice on how to improve their work. One girl commented that she was unclear about how to make progress before but now the teacher makes it very clear how she can improve her work and achieve a higher level.

p.2

Main findings

You have successfully identified the priorities which are necessary to drive up the quality of teaching and learning but the school action plan has too many areas of focus. As a result governors understand, in broad terms, what needs to be done to improve the school, but are still too reliant on the information they are given by school leaders about the progress the school is making. A more condensed school action plan will help governors to ask relevant and searching questions about pupil progress and the quality of teaching, and therefore hold leaders to account more effectively.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Local authority officers have helped to support you by providing training opportunities for teachers, attending regular progress meetings and drafting reports. These reports have been useful in assessing the quality of teaching and in identifying areas for further development. The local authority has provided effective training on phonics which has been very helpful. You have also been able to draw upon expertise in the Early Years Foundation Stage to strengthen the teaching in this area. As a result of this support a number of improvements have been made to the learning environment and the more effective use of learning journals.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire.

p.3

Associate Inspector

cc. Chair of the Governing Body cc. Local authority

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion