Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
IP2 9LR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It also needs to demonstrate how leaders will deal with the challenges and opportunities presented by moving into new buildings in September 2015. p.2
- It also needs to provide an overview of trust support over a longer time frame, and clarify who will be responsible for the monitoring and evaluation of developments. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 858
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Craig D’Cunha Principal Suffolk New Academy Mallard Way Ipswich IP2 9LR
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Suffolk New Academy
Following my visit to your academy on 4 March 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Suffolk New Academy
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in December 2014.
p.1
Evidence
Meetings were held with the Principal, members of the senior leadership team and former members of the sponsor’s trust board of directors, who recently resigned having drawn up the trust’s statement of action. A telephone discussion was undertaken with the new Chief Executive Officer of the sponsoring trust. A series of short visits to classrooms were made jointly with the Principal to observe teaching and learning. The academy’s single central record of staff was checked. The sponsor’s statement of action and the academy’s improvement plan were evaluated.
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection a new Principal has been appointed. He had been in post for seven days at the time of this visit. One interim Co-Principal left in December 2014. The other is remaining in the leadership team as Associate Principal until Easter 2015. The trustees of the academy’s sponsor, the New Academies Trust, Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9162 Direct email : peter.willetts@serco.com resigned the day before this inspection, as did all the members of the governing body. A newly appointed board of trustees for the New Academies Trust immediately assumed responsibility for local governance of the academy. The new trustees are also trustees of the Active Learning Trust, and it is planned that this trust will take over as sponsor in September 2015.
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Despite the high level of recent turbulence in the governance of the academy, senior leaders have worked hard to focus on starting to improve teaching and learning. Responsibilities within the senior leadership team have been reorganised to allow more careful monitoring of the progress of individuals and groups of students, and to enable appropriate help and guidance to be provided to accelerate students’ progress where necessary. The measures taken to strengthen the leadership of teaching have increased the support and challenge for teachers.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The academy timetable has already been revised to provide more teaching time for English and mathematics. Leaders have clarified key policies. Evidence from this visit suggests that the quality of marking and feedback has already started to improve across the academy. Leaders are ensuring that all teachers are applying the behaviour policy more consistently and this has started to reduce the incidence of low-level disruption. Teachers now provide senior leaders with data about students’ attainment more regularly and the accuracy of this information is more rigorously checked. Senior leaders are confident that their predictions of students’ future performance are now more secure as a result.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The effectiveness and pace of improvement are currently restricted by weaknesses in the academy’s own improvement plan. The plan currently does not cover any intended actions beyond this academic year. The academy needs a longer-term vision of its future improvement. It is particularly important that the academy considers how it will evaluate the summer 2015 examination results and act upon this evaluation. It also needs to demonstrate how leaders will deal with the challenges and opportunities presented by moving into new buildings in September 2015. The plan does not cover all the areas highlighted for improvement in the inspection report. It does not incorporate specific strands about how the academy will improve consistency in the presentation of students’ work or improve communication with parents. The plan does not emphasise strongly enough the need for improvement of mathematics, which is evident in the inspection report.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The improvement plan does not outline any strategies for enhancing the quality of governance. The external review of governance recommended in the inspection report has not been undertaken or planned. The plan does not clarify who will be responsible for leading each area of improvement, or for monitoring and evaluating the impact of these developments.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The sponsor’s statement of action does not clearly outline how the trust will help the academy in bringing about necessary improvement. While it reiterates the actions academy leaders will undertake as outlined in their own improvement plan, it does not provide sufficient information about the role that the trust itself will play in supporting these developments. It also needs to provide an overview of trust support over a longer time frame, and clarify who will be responsible for the monitoring and evaluation of developments.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The sponsor’s statement of action is not fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The academy’s improvement plan is not fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I strongly recommend that the academy does not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chief Executive Officer of the New Academies Trust and the Director of Children’s Services for Suffolk. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion