Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
John Nixon
- Postcode verified
L22 0LD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders, supported by the governing body, rightly decided that they must immediately reduce some of the work they were undertaking in the local educational community to focus their energies on bringing about the required improvements in their own school. p.2
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- However, governors’ evaluation of the impact actions should be improved further by sharpening the focus of their regular visits to school to check for themselves the impact in classes. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 990
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 24 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Ruth Baldwin Headteacher Waterloo Primary School Crosby Road North Waterloo Sefton Merseyside L22 0LD
p.1
School, Sefton
Following my visit to your school on 25 February 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School, Sefton
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School, Sefton
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School, Sefton
Develop how teachers make best use of displays and classroom environments to share good practice and allow pupils to apply their learning.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders and representatives of the Governing Body. A meeting was held with the representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The inspector, accompanied by senior leaders, visited all classes and learning bases in the school to see them at work and to talk with pupils. A selection CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566937 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :jsimmons@cfbt.com of pupils’ books and other documents related to school improvement were examined.
p.1
Context
There has been no significant change to the context of the school since the last section 5 inspection.
p.2
Main findings
School leaders took immediate actions to improve the effectiveness of the school following the Section 5 inspection. Governors immediately set up a dedicated committee of appropriately skilled governors to oversee the planning and implementation of leaders’ actions to improve the school. This committee is effectively challenging leaders and holding them to account.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders, supported by the governing body, rightly decided that they must immediately reduce some of the work they were undertaking in the local educational community to focus their energies on bringing about the required improvements in their own school. This has resulted in actions being implemented rapidly and checked regularly to ensure that the school is improving quickly.
p.2
Main findings
Governors can easily check that the school is improving towards its next inspection because the school’s action plan is well-structured and contains appropriate priorities and clear expectations. These priorities sharply focus on the key issues identified at the last school inspection and identify clearly what the expected outcomes are at times throughout the year. However, governors’ evaluation of the impact actions should be improved further by sharpening the focus of their regular visits to school to check for themselves the impact in classes.
p.2
Main findings
The quality of teaching is improving because senior and middle leaders have improved greatly the effectiveness of their monitoring and how it is used to identify issues in learning. Observation of teaching is now more sharply focused on the outcome of pupils rather than actions of teachers and other adults. Leaders quickly pinpoint issues within subjects, classes or groups and take rapid actions to address them.
p.2
Main findings
The school’s marking policy is now more consistently implemented and is resulting in pupils being given better guidance on how to improve their work. The restructuring of timetables to give pupils additional time to use this guidance and the development of the use of ‘the purple pen of progress’ which allows them to identify where improvements are being made, is leading to better quality work seen in pupils’ books, particularly in writing. Leaders have changed the organisation of teaching in the school. Class sizes have been reduced and classes now include pupils with a smaller range of abilities, particularly for English and mathematics lessons. This allows teachers to more sharply focus their teaching on pupils’ needs; this is leading to pupils improving their rates of progress, particularly in English.
p.2
Main findings
The development of the quality of teaching in early years is being effectively supported by local authority consultants who work with the school. The enthusiasm and skills of members of staff working in the department have been harnessed to drive improvement. Imaginative curriculum themes that interest children, particularly boys, now give opportunities for them to develop their writing in all areas of learning on a regular basis. Writing is seen as having a purpose and is enjoyed by children. Children, who were beginning a new theme based around superheroes, were keen to share their writing, telling the inspector about how their superhero was going to help find the ‘missing’ class hamster that had been kidnapped by an imaginary villain.
p.3
Main findings
Staff in all year groups are improving their practice because they have been given some opportunities to visit other schools to see good provision and discuss its characteristics. These visits are carefully planned to meet individual teachers’ training needs whilst also offering experiences in schools that have a similar context to Waterloo Primary. Additionally, appropriate staff training has been implemented in school because work with the local authority consultants and one-to-one-discussions with teachers from all year groups have been used well to identify individual teacher’s training needs.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The school draws effectively upon the additional support provided by the local authority to support and enhance the development of the quality of teaching. Local authority consultants for English and early years have been welcomed into the school and are working to develop both the quality of teaching and the effectiveness of leaders in monitoring the impact of actions.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Sefton.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion