Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
GL6 0PL
- Name on report verified
Ruskin Mill College
- URN verified
133036
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. p.5
- It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. p.5
- If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . p.5
- You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. p.5
- To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and provider inspection reports, please visit https://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/user . p.5
- T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 561
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 33, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
AI-17 Follow up re-inspection monitoring visit report
p.1
Published date 16 March 2015 Inspection Number 455918 Unique reference number: 133036
p.1
Last day of inspection: 11 February 2015
p.1
Type of provider: Independent specialist college
p.1
Address:
The Fisheries Stroud Horsley GL6 0PL Telephone number: 01453 837500 Ruskin Mill College
p.1
Context and focus of visit
This is the fourth follow up re-inspection monitoring visit to Ruskin Mill College following publication of the inspection report on 25 April 2014. The inspection found the effectiveness of leadership and management to be inadequate; teaching, learning and assessment were good, as were outcomes for students. The overall effectiveness of the college was found to be inadequate.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Ruskin Mill College is part of Ruskin Mill Trust Limited. The college is situated on a large site in Gloucestershire and provides a curriculum based on craft activities such as willow, iron and leatherwork, and land-based activities that include biodynamic horticulture, care of livestock and fish farming. The college provides for students with a range of learning disabilities, emotional needs and challenging behaviours.
p.2
compromise the safety and health of students?
Managers and staff continue to build on the early improvements made in safeguarding. The vast majority of students across the college and in residential accommodation feel safe and know what feeling safe means within the college and residential setting. The appointment of an additional safeguarding manager with good experience and expertise in safeguarding in other situations brings a more rigorous approach to the quality assurance of safeguarding. The involvement by students in promoting and reinforcing safeguarding is now well established. Articles and notices appear in the student magazine on a variety of topics including bullying and e-safety.
p.2
compromise the safety and health of students?
Education and residential staff make very effective use of the web-based behaviour reporting system to share information and report incidents. This enables staff to respond quickly and effectively to safeguarding and health and safety incidents or other concerns. Managers and staff use safeguarding data effectively to plan training and review behavioural and support strategies; the data are also used to improve the evaluation of the effectiveness of safeguarding, and identify where further work is required.
p.2
compromise the safety and health of students?
Formal training sessions give staff the skills and confidence to deal with difficult or potentially dangerous circumstances and contribute to the safer and calmer environment for students. Staff identify potential difficult or stressful situations for students and make suitable plans to minimise any distress or anxieties. For example, before students receive information that could trigger a very negative response, staff agree who will give the information, organise the layout of the environment, discuss how they will talk to the student and identify any support needed following the meeting.
p.2
compromise the safety and health of students?
The new safeguarding manager is now a member of the admissions panel and safeguarding has a greater emphasis during the admissions process. Parents, carers and students are more involved in agreeing the outcomes from the admissions risk assessment. Admissions staff take good account of the mental capacity of each applicant when devising and agreeing the initial individual learning plan. The role and expectations of commissioning local authorities are more clearly defined. When students leave the college, and during holidays, staff identify the support and resources required to sustain and build on the progress made by students. However, as no students have left since this improvement it is too early to judge the effectiveness of this development.
p.3
and monitored effectively?
The closer working relationship between the head of residential manager and the deputy principal has resulted in a more collaborative and cooperative approach to meeting the individual needs of students. College staff have a good understanding of how the contributions of the educational and residential provision need to be coordinated effectively. Staff recognise that a clear emphasis on how both elements of the provision contribute to the achievement of learning goals is fundamental if students are to reach their full potential. The training given to residential and college staff continues to reinforce the need for all staff to have a consistent approach to meeting the needs of students.
p.3
and monitored effectively?
The involvement of a deputy principal, the head of residential manager and a member of the college’s Pathways team in the admission arrangements increases the likelihood that agreed learning plans will have a strong emphasis on the likely destination of the student and how all parts of the college contribute to successful outcomes.
p.3
and monitored effectively?
Managers are revising the method for the recognition and recording of progress and achievement (RARPA) so that short-, medium- and long-term goal planning are more personalised and focused on students’ intended destinations. This work is at an early stage and the college will need to ensure that the paperwork, including the one-page profiles, supports the process; and that education and residential staff are clear about how their work contributes to the achievement of students’ goals and their successful transition beyond Ruskin Mill College.
p.3
Leadership and management
The new Principal recognised that the previous organisational structure was not fully meeting the needs of students. He has taken decisive action by strengthening the roles relating to admissions to the college, and by revising the management of the transition of students to their next stage after leaving Ruskin Mill College. The new role of education learning coordinator (ELC) has a much greater emphasis on supporting the learning process. Managers intend that ELCs will make better use of well-being, therapy and safeguarding specialists to ensure that students make good progress and achieve their learning goals.
p.4
Leadership and management
Managers recognise that not all students benefit from good preparation for their next stage or are able to make fully informed choices about the opportunities available to them. As a result of the restructure, the Pathways team now has responsibility for ensuring that students progress to a positive destination. It is too early to judge the effectiveness of this development.
p.4
Leadership and management
The new Principal has revised the previous self-assessment report and quality improvement plan. The revised documents are more evaluative, self-critical and clearly identify the priorities for action. The quality improvement plan has a good emphasis on the needs of students, but some action points need revision to identify clearly the benefit to students.
p.4
Leadership and management
College leaders have developed stronger arrangements for managing staff performance. This process now makes better links between the work of staff and its impact on students’ experience at the college, and its contribution to key college targets. Observations of learning are becoming rigorous and are more closely linked to the impact on individual students and on college-wide improvements. As with other recent initiatives, the effectiveness of performance management could not be judged at the time of the monitoring visit.
p.4
Leadership and management
Managers correctly identified that further work is required to ensure that all staff have the appropriate skills, understanding and expertise necessary for all students to improve their English and mathematical skills. Similarly, the responsibility for all relevant staff to provide good or better information, advice and guidance to students, so that they can make informed choices about their futures, is now an identified priority for action.
p.4
Reasonable improvement for students
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for students of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.
p.5
Reasonable improvement for students
To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and provider inspection reports, please visit https://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.5
Reasonable improvement for students
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion