Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Newlands

Inspected — · published 17 Mar 2015 · URN SC415347

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Julian Mason

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Julian Mason

  • Postcode verified

    B49 5JG

  • URN verified

    SC415347

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−56Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimproved
Criticismdeclinedlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings62w−33
  • What needs to improve150w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
212
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 50
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 78%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC415347 Inspector Julian Mason Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Registered person Young Options College Limited Registered person address Turnpike Gate House Alcester Heath Alcester Warwickshire B49 5JG Responsible individual Graham Baker Registered manager Mark Anthony Duckers Date of last inspection 02/07/2014 2 of 5 Inspection date 10/02/2015

p.1

Previous inspection adequate Enforcement action since last inspection none

p.2

This inspection

This home was judged adequate at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has improved effectiveness .

p.2

This inspection

Some changes to the way in which the home is managed have taken place since the last inspection. The Registered Manager no longer manages two children’s homes and is now able to devote his full time attention to this service. This has bought benefits to both the staff team and young people, as the manager provides greater visible leadership, guidance and support on a day-to-day basis. The home’s staffing arrangements are also more stable and consistent in providing young people with improved opportunities to grow positive attachments and relationships with their carers.

p.2

This inspection

The last inspection made one requirement and two recommendations, which have all been addressed. The home uses less cover staff because there is a permanent and established residential team. The Registered Manager only admits young people whose assessed needs the home can meet. Staff received the training they need to ensure their skills and knowledge are matched to the individual needs of each young person.

p.2

This inspection

Staff continue to be very alert to the potential risks young people may face in the community, especially for those young people who are vulnerable to exploitation. Young people’s safety is the first priority of the staff team; they are clear about their role and responsibilities and what to do if they have a concern. This is because the Registered Manager promotes good safeguarding practices, which are central to the team’s work with very vulnerable young people.

p.2

This inspection

Strategies are well deployed to ensure young people’s safety and protection is maintained and promoted. For example, robust and consistent monitoring is undertaken for the periods young people are away from the home on agreed family contact and overnight stays. Where concerns emerge, swift communication is made with other agencies involved in the protection of young people. Young people are 3 of 5 frequently engaged in discussions with staff about topics that relate to their personal safety and well-being and state that they feel safe in the home. These arrangements help to keep young people safe and have contributed to reducing the risks previously experienced by them.

p.2

This inspection

There are effective partnerships with stakeholders and external agencies. The development of positive relationships with external professionals and services means that the staff team are well placed to tackle any shortfalls in service provision. This helps to ensure young people receive the right support when needed.

p.3

This inspection

Relationships between staff and young people are constructive and helpful. Any unsafe behaviour is managed in a way that offers different ways of behaving that are more socially acceptable. Staff focus on successes and positive actions to help build young people’s confidence when they change or improve their behaviour. The home is good at adapting and modifying plans to take account of individual circumstances and how each young person learns and is motivated to do things differently. The use of physical intervention is minimal and missing from care events are much less now than in previous periods. Detailed monitoring of these circumstances supports the on-going assessment of risk, which helps inform staff of the most effective ways to help young people sustain the progress they make.

p.3

This inspection

Young people are provided with living accommodation that is spacious, clean and tidy. The living environment continues to be improved because of the on-going investment in the interior parts of the home. For example, recent decoration and improvements to communal areas has further enhanced young people’s living space and comfort. Overall, the external maintenance of the home is satisfactory although damage to the guttering close to one of the entrances is yet to be repaired. 4 of 5

p.3

Information about this children’s home

The home is registered to provide care and accommodation for three young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. The home is privately owned.

p.4

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

02/07/2014 Full adequate 03/02/2014 Interim good progress 27/06/2013 Full adequate 30/01/2013 Interim good progress

p.4

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure that all parts of the children's home used by children are kept in good structural repair externally, this is in relation to the guttering by one of the entrances to the home. (Regulation 31(2)(d)) 31/03/2015 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.5

What inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion