Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Peter Humphries
- Postcode verified
DY1 3QE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 936
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Bene Willis Headteacher Sycamore Short Stay School Old Farm Estate Dudley DY1 3QE
p.1
Stay School
Following my visit to your school on 27 February 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Stay School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Stay School
Senior leaders and management committee are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to ensure:
p.1
Stay School
action plans have specific measurable targets and indicate how, when and by whom the impact of actions will be checked, evaluated and communicated to the management committee
p.1
Stay School
the progress of students in Year 3, 4 and 5 is accelerated in writing and mathematics
p.1
Stay School
all students use the feedback and guidance provided by teachers to improve their work
p.1
Stay School
accommodation is provided for the medical examination and treatment of students and the short-term care of sick or injured students which includes a washing facility and is near a toilet Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9162 Direct email : peter.willetts@serco.com information from excluding schools is in sufficient detail to enable the school to plan appropriate intervention, guidance and support, especially for the most vulnerable students.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, deputy headteacher and representatives of the management committee and the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. Meetings were also held with the primary and secondary curriculum and assessment leaders. The headteacher showed me around the school and we visited all classes. During these visits to classrooms, I looked at the work in students’ books and spoke to them about their learning. I looked at a range of documentation, including the school’s post-Ofsted inspection action plan and information about students’ progress and behaviour.
p.2
Context
Since the inspection in November 2014, one teacher has left the school. As a result, the number of classes has been reduced from four to three. There have been no other significant changes.
p.2
Main findings
The headteacher, school leaders and management committee have acted quickly to address the areas for improvement identified in the recent inspection. A post-Ofsted inspection action plan has been produced which includes appropriate actions for improvement. However, the plan does not clearly identify how success will be measured or how, when and by whom the impact of the actions will be checked, evaluated and communicated to the management committee.
p.2
Main findings
Since the last inspection, school leaders have introduced a project-based approach to learning. For example, during this inspection students were purposefully engaged in activities involving writing about and designing environments for animals kept in a zoo. As a result, information provided by the school shows that students in Year 6, 7, 8 and 9 are, from their starting points, making the progress expected of them in reading, writing and mathematics. However, the progress of students in Year 3, 4 and 5 is less than expected in writing and mathematics.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers recently undertook training that included how to effectively assess students’ work and provide helpful feedback. As a consequence, most students know how to improve their work. However, a small minority of students do not act upon the advice given by teachers. Since the last inspection, all school staff have undertaken training led by an educational psychologist on how to engage reluctant learners and to effectively deal with students who are agitated or distressed. Staff said that they now feel more confident in ensuring students’ needs are met and in dealing with difficult, disruptive and challenging students. As a result, students’ behaviour is improving. The number of serious behaviour incidents, physical interventions and fixed term exclusions has reduced significantly.
p.2
Main findings
School leaders, staff and students, in collaboration with an educational psychologist, have reviewed the use of ‘quiet rooms’. As a result, the floor covering in the quiet rooms have been replaced. The environment has been further enhanced by the painting of murals on the walls. The risk of students hurting themselves in the quiet rooms has been reduced. However, the school does not have suitable accommodation for the medical examination and treatment of students and the short-term care of sick or injured students which includes a washing facility and is near a toilet.
p.3
Main findings
Since the inspection in November, the curriculum and assessment leaders have worked with mainstream schools. They have led training for teachers and teaching assistants on learning and teaching approaches and assessing students’ work. As a result, information provided by the school shows that the quality of teaching has improved and the majority of students are making better progress in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.3
External support
The local authority provides effective support for the school by commissioning the support of a short stay school service manager and human resources and financial services support. However, the school and the local authority have not ensured that the information they receive from excluding schools is always sufficient in order to plan appropriate intervention, support and guidance for individual students, especially those that are most vulnerable.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Management Committee and the Director of Children’s Services for Dudley.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion