Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by SureCare Residential Ltd in Essex
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectors verified
Fiona Littlefield
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CM23 2LD
- URN verified
SC384018
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. p.5
- At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.5
- This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 243
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 29, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC384018 Inspector Fiona Littlefield Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Registered person Surecare Residential Limited Registered person address 19e North Street, 2nd Floor Bishops Stortford Hertfordshire CM23 2LD Responsible individual Simon Peter Barr Registered manager Patricia Haley Date of last inspection 19/11/2014 2 of 5 Inspection date 05/02/2015
p.1
Previous inspection good Enforcement action since last inspection none
p.2
This inspection
This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has declined in effectiveness .
p.2
This inspection
At the full inspection in November 2014, the overall effectiveness of the home was judged as good. The home has declined in effectiveness since this time.
p.2
This inspection
The Registered Manager has been absent since January 2015. Managers within the organisation are taking action to address and remedy this situation. These circumstances have, however, had a direct impact on the continuity and consistency of young people’s care.
p.2
This inspection
For some young people, the arrangements for contact with their families have not been followed correctly. This indicates a failure in effective communication between managers and staff. This has compromised young people's safety. Contact arrangements have recently been clarified and strengthened so that young people have more predictable and organised contact with family members.
p.2
This inspection
On occasion, the behaviour of some young people has been very challenging. The impact of this on other young people in the home has been to leave them feeling unsettled and unhappy. This has been reflected in a reduction in school attendance for some young people, who had previously been making progress in this area. Some young people previously told their social workers that they wanted to leave the home. Young people’s loss of confidence in the home was confirmed by family members and some external professionals. However, young people report that the situation has recently stabilised. This has led to a recent improvement in school attendance for some young people.
p.2
This inspection
Young people respond positively to staff who know their needs well and are attentive to them. They describe a nurturing and committed staff team, who they can rely on for regular, reliable guidelines. Young people say that they are, ‘pleased with boundaries, as they feel safer’. 3 of 5 Managers have not effectively monitored the quality of care and professional practice in the home. This is a missed opportunity to reflect on the impact of recent developments for the young people and to identify areas for improvement. Senior managers in the organisation are aware of this shortfall and are addressing this as a matter of urgency.
p.2
This inspection
Managers and staff have recorded incidents, notifications and restraints appropriately since the last inspection. However, the frequency of incidents since the last inspection indicates that this has been a difficult time. Staff, who enjoy good relationships with young people, were concerned about the impact of a disturbed environment on the residents in the home.
p.3
This inspection
In these circumstances, staff require robust leadership, regular supervision and training. However, these arrangements have fallen short of providing staff with the support they need. Staff now report that this shortfall is being addressed. Supervision arrangements have recently been reviewed and strengthened. Morale amongst staff has improved in the past few weeks. They are now more confident that they can work positively with the young people. 4 of 5
p.3
Information about this children’s home
This home is one of a small group of homes run by an independent provider. This home offers care for up to four young people assessed to have emotional or behavioural difficulties, mild learning difficulties or autistic spectrum disorders.
p.4
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
19/11/2014 Full good 05/03/2014 Interim good progress 07/11/2013 Full adequate 13/02/2013 Interim good progress
p.4
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.4
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) promote and make proper provision for the safeguarding and welfare of children accommodated and make proper provision for the care, education, supervision, support and, where appropriate, treatment, of children accommodated (Regulation 11(1)(a)(b)) 19/02/2015
p.4
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) ensure that all persons employed receive training, supervision and appraisal (Regulation 27(4)(a)) 19/03/2015
p.4
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) establish and maintain a system for improving the quality of care provided in the children’s home. (Regulation 34(1)(b)) 19/03/2015 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.4
Reg. Requirement Due date
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.5
What inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion