Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Chris Campbell
- Postcode verified
RM3 9JD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 927
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Susan Garner, The Headteacher Mead Primary School Amersham Road Romford RM3 9JD
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 10 February 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior and middle leaders, three members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. The purpose of these meetings was to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. Short visits were made to twelve classes, as I toured the school with you. I also met with a group of pupils and talked to others informally during visits to classrooms. The school’s action plan and a range of other documents were evaluated. Tribal Kings Orchard 1 Queens Street Bristol, BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Context
Since the last full inspection no teachers have left the school. However, the headteacher will be leaving the school at the end of the spring term. Governors have already appointed her successor to take up post in the summer term. A small number of teachers are also leaving the school at Easter. The Chair and Vice Chair of the governing body, both previous members of the governing body, are new to their roles since the last inspection.
p.2
Main findings
You have taken quick action to set a clear course for school improvement. The action plan directly addresses the areas for further improvement raised at the full inspection. You have ensured that all teachers have an accurate understanding of the learning needs of their pupils. This is helping them to plan learning activities that challenge pupils with greater precision. Work books and class activities show that pupils are starting to complete different work according to their abilities. More able pupils are beginning to work on more demanding tasks that make them think hard. This is supporting them to make better progress. Pupils were able to tell me what they were learning about and why.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders in the school are checking the progress and learning of pupils more frequently. This is helping the school sharpen the precision of its interventions for pupils, when they are not making enough progress. Leaders and teachers are adapting their approaches to focus on learning. They choose topics carefully to engage and help boys’ progress, including in the early years foundation stage. Both boys and girls told me that they find their learning interesting and that teachers help them work hard. Pupils of all ages are developing helpful strategies to sort out difficulties when they ‘get stuck’.
p.2
Main findings
You have set out clear expectations for teachers’ marking and feedback to pupils. All teachers are using the agreed method of marking. Pupils are responding more frequently, especially where they have made mistakes in spelling, punctuation or grammar. This is beginning to improve the quality of pupils’ written work. Developing marking, so that there is a greater focus on how to reach the next stages in learning will improve progress further.
p.2
Main findings
You have set clear expectations for staff for teaching a range of mathematical approaches to problem solving. The training you have provided is helping them to plan activities to tackle problem solving activities frequently. This is helping pupils build confidence in re-applying their learning. The wider use of practical equipment is helping pupils apply different techniques and test their understanding.
p.2
Main findings
You are involving other senior and middle leaders to a greater extent in checking on the quality of teaching. This is improving their understanding of how to improve teaching and secure better pupil progress. Middle leaders are becoming more adept in improving teaching through leading training and coaching. This is contributing to a more consistent approach to learning. As a consequence, pupils are clear about what they have to do and how to go about it.
p.2
Main findings
You have put in place straight forward steps to ensure that learning is not disrupted as pupils return from intervention groups to their normal classes. Pupils now continue sensibly with suitable work until they join main class activities.
p.3
Main findings
You have made sure that pupils understand that name calling is unacceptable as part of the school’s work to ensure good behaviour and pupil’s respect for each other. When this does occur, pupils confirm that staff are effective in dealing with this. Staff are vigilant and the school records these incidents.
p.3
Main findings
While there remains much to do on the journey of improvement to good or better, your decisive actions are turning Mead Primary School in the right direction.
p.3
External Support
The local authority is providing good quality support to the school. Through the monthly progress meetings, it models high levels of challenge to the school. This is helping the school to sharpen its practices. Specialised support has been provided to develop the school’s approach to teaching spelling, punctuation and grammar.
p.3
External Support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Havering and as below.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion