Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Dunkley, Amanda

Inspected 10 Feb 2015 · published 7 Mar 2015 · URN 257202

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Adelaide Griffith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Feb 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Adelaide Griffith

  • Early years AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • URN verified

    257202

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−2Mixedmore positive than 34% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelygood progresspositivemake good progressambitiousstrongwell behavedconfident
Criticismnot alwaysnot sufficientlynot effectivenot rigorousrequires improvementinconsistentweaknessesnot secure knowledge

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings70w−43
  • What needs to improve779w+2

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
800
about usual (typical 773)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 62%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 10 February 2015 4 March 2009

p.1

3

Previous inspection: Outstanding 1 How well the early years provision meets the needs of the range of children who attend Requires improvement The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children Good 2

p.1

3

The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the early years provision Requires improvement The setting does not meet legal requirements for early years settings

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 The childminder does not have a sufficiently secure knowledge of all areas of learning to plan appropriately for young children's development in the prime areas of learning.  Assessments are not effective enough or implemented when required, and this means that children do not always receive targeted support to make good progress in their development.  Monitoring is not sufficiently rigorous because the childminder does not always clarify where changes are needed to improve children's learning experiences.  Self-evaluation does not take account of weaknesses in order to clearly identify priorities for improvement.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder appropriately promotes children's language skills through all activities, and she provides interesting resources to support children's learning.  Children are well behaved and they develop good independence skills. Children are confident and they are very happy in the setting.  The childminder is well informed about her responsibilities to protect children. She attends regular training to refresh her knowledge and understanding of safeguarding procedures.  There are positive partnerships with parents and other early years providers, ensuring the childminder works jointly with them to address children's needs.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 develop knowledge and understanding of all areas of learning to plan stimulating activities, ensuring there is a focus on the prime areas of learning for younger children  implement an effective system to assess children's achievements and use information from observations, and about children's interests, more effectively to support their good progress  carry out the progress check for children aged between two and three years, and provide parents with a summary of their child's development to ensure there is a shared understanding of children's achievements and how to further promote their learning.

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 review the methods for monitoring planning and assessments to critically evaluate how to effectively make changes that support children's learning  develop and review the self-evaluation process to identify and prioritise targets for improvements to make changes so that weaknesses are promptly addressed.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector had a tour of the premises with the childminder.  The inspector observed teaching and learning activities in the indoor learning environment.  The inspector looked at a sample of procedures and children's records.  The inspector checked the childminder's self-evaluation form.  The inspector took account of the written feedback from parents.

p.2

who attend. This requires improvement

The quality of teaching is inconsistent because the childminder delivers some activities that are very ambitious for children's age and stage of development. At the same time, other activities are suitable and appropriately support children's learning. For example, the childminder plans activities in which she includes recognition of complex shapes, which are far ahead of the basic shapes that children first learn. The childminder constantly talks with children throughout all activities, ensuring their listening, understanding and speaking skills are promoted. However, the childminder does not have a secure understanding of how to focus activities on the prime areas so that these are always planned for in young children's learning. The childminder regularly observes children while they play and she records what they do. However, assessments are not precise and do not always clearly identify children's achievements. The planning of activities to reflect children's next steps

p.3

who attend. This requires improvement

in learning is not always appropriate. This does not support children in making good progress.

p.3

good

The childminder is well-informed about safeguarding practice and this means she effectively promotes children's welfare. She rigorously follows procedures to ensure children are safe, resulting in good promotion of their well-being. The childminder constantly motivates children and they develop high levels of independence skills. Regular attendance at groups help children to mix with others away from the childminder's setting. Children therefore develop self-confidence in preparation for the next stage in their learning. Children's good health is effectively promoted due to opportunities for daily physical exercise and they learn about healthy choices. The childminder has good resources, such as large posters, which she uses to talk to children about foods that are good for them. Children form strong attachments to the childminder and they demonstrate by their actions that they feel emotionally secure. The childminder frequently gives praise,

p.3

good

resulting in children's raised self-esteem, and in turn, their good behaviour.

p.3

provision requires improvement

The childminder does not have a sufficiently good understanding of the learning and development requirements. Although she monitors planning and the assessments of children learning, the childminder does not always identify key areas for improvement. There are positive partnerships with parents who are pleased with the support children receive. The childminder maintains a daily flow of information about children's experiences. However, parents are not informed about the progress check for children aged between two and three years. The childminder has not carried out this required assessment to provide feedback about children's achievements. Although the childminder reviews her provision, self-evaluation is not sufficiently rigorous. The childminder has regular discussions with other early years providers where children attend to clarify how to support children's learning.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 257202 Local authority Birmingham Inspection number 854919 Type of provision Childminder Registration category Childminder Age range of children 0 - 17 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 13

p.4

Name of provider

Date of previous inspection 4 March 2009

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder was registered in 2001. She operates all year round from 6.30am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion