Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Horner, Michele

Inspected 10 Feb 2015 · published 6 Mar 2015 · URN EY101683

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Feb 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Jennifer Kennaugh

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • URN verified

    EY101683

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Early yearsGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehighly effectiveeffectivemake good progressenjoyconsistentlyeffectivelysecuresafe
Criticismnot confidentconcernsnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings346w+48
  • What needs to improve71w+5

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
407
shorter than usual (typical 703)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 50
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 26%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 68%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 10 February 2015 13 May 2009

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Previous inspection: Good 2 How well the early years provision meets the needs of the range of children who attend Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the early years provision Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The setting meets legal requirements for early years settings

p.1

This provision is good

 The childminder has a secure understanding of the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage and therefore, provides good quality care and learning for children.  Children make good progress in readiness for their next steps in learning, including attending full-time school.  The childminder and her assistant provide a stimulating learning environment both indoors and outside, along with a balance of activities, which are both initiated by children or planned by adults.  The childminder has a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of how to identify and manage any safeguarding concerns she may have about children.  The childminder makes highly effective use of partnerships with parents to help them support their children's progress, including by providing educational activities that children can enjoy at home.  Children are learning how to maintain good personal hygiene, as well as the importance

p.1

This provision is good

of healthy eating and taking regular exercise.

p.1

It is not yet outstanding because:

 The activities provided for children to make marks are not always best matched to the learning needs of children under three-years-old in order to optimise their progress.  The childminder has not extended the use of her well-established systems for rewarding progress to enhance the support and encouragement for children who are less confident in their speaking skills.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 refine the planning for activities for making marks so that they are consistently well- matched to the learning needs of children under three years old in order to optimise their progress  enhance the ways to support children who are less confident to speak to join in using the already established systems for rewarding and celebrating progress.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector viewed the areas of the premises used for childminding.  The inspector checked the qualifications of the childminder and her assistant, along with evidence of the suitability of adults living or working on the premises.  A joint observation was carried out by the inspector and the childminder.  The inspector examined samples of documentation related to children's welfare and learning, used by the childminder when caring for children.  The inspector discussed the childminder's and her assistant's knowledge of areas, such as safeguarding and supporting individual children's learning.  The inspector and the childminder discussed the ways in which the childminder evaluates her provision and seeks the views of others to inform this.

p.2

who attend. This is good

The childminder provides a comprehensive range of activities and resources, in order to promote individual children's progress across all areas of learning. She monitors children's progress in detail and uses her assessments effectively in order to plan for each child's next steps in learning. The childminder demonstrates good teaching skills for all ages of children. She asks questions of pre-school age children, which support their thinking and speaking skills very well. For example, she asks children about their families, which is a familiar topic that enables them to sustain their talk. The childminder makes very good use of everyday actions to support children's counting. For example, she encourages children to identify the numbers shown on the time display on the microwave. The vast majority of activities are very well-matched to children's individual needs, although some for making marks are not always the best fit for the needs of children under three-years-

p.3

who attend. This is good

old. This is because they do not always fulfil these children's needs to explore rather than work toward a specific outcome. For example, they are offered the same activity as the pre-school children for making marks. This helps them to practise the skills needed before learning to write by holding a large pen. However, the activity does not fully meet their needs as they do not have a wider range of resources to explore for making marks.

p.3

good

The childminder and her assistant encourage children to show respect for others so that children learn tolerance and a positive attitude to other's needs. They model good manners and children copy these, enhancing their development of social skills. Children enhance their self-help skills in readiness for school as the childminder and assistant emphasise the importance of children learning to fasten their coats and shoes themselves. Children are taught how to stay safe, including learning about road safety. Children are rapidly acquiring the confidence needed to succeed in future learning and some of their successes are celebrated through simple motivators like certificates. Although, this is not yet extended to enhance the support for children who join in conversation less readily, in order to encourage their speaking skills.

p.3

provision is good

All documents and records are meticulously kept to support the safe and effective running of the setting. The childminder manages her assistant's training and performance effectively. For example, she gives her assistant frequent feedback during the day to help tailor her practice to meet the needs of the children. Both the assistant and the childminder have qualifications in paediatric first-aid in order to deal correctly with any minor injuries children may incur. The childminder implements thorough risk assessments and reviews these regularly to ensure they remain effective in minimising risk to children. Self-evaluation is highly effective in enabling the childminder to undertake training, which enhances the care and learning for children. The childminder frequently seeks the views of parents and children in order to support her drive for continuous improvement.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY101683 Local authority Rochdale Inspection number 869595 Type of provision Childminder Registration category Childminder Age range of children 0 - 17 Total number of places 12 Number of children on roll 8

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 2002. She lives in the Middleton area of Rochdale, Greater Manchester. The childminding setting operates, from 7.30am to 5.30pm, all year round apart from family holidays and bank holidays. The childminder is qualified to level 3 in childcare. She works with an assistant who is unqualified.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion