Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Progress Schools - Northamptonshire

Inspected 10 Dec 2014 · published 15 Jan 2015 · URN 135754

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Carter (lead), Joanne Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Dec 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    David Carter, Joanne Smith

  • Postcode verified

    NN1 2BG

  • Name on report verified

    Education & Youth Services Ltd

  • URN verified

    135754

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−71Very criticalmore positive than 4% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseclearimprovedeffectiveeffectivelyindependentsecure
Criticismnot metshortcomingsweaknesseslackfailedfailuresout-of-dateabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1983w−90
  • What needs to improve438w+63

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
2,381
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Progress monitoring school report Education & Youth Services Ltd 8 Notre Dame Mews, Northampton, NN1 2BG

p.1

Context of the inspection

 The inspection was undertaken at the request of registration authority for independent schools, in order to monitor the progress the school has made since its last inspection.  A material change inspection visit was carried out in June 2014, at the request of the Department of Education. The inspection was to advise whether the school was in a position to extend its age range to 14 to 18 years and to increase its capacity to 170 students across its four centres that are located at Northampton, Kettering, Corby, and Wellingborough. The inspection found that the school failed to comply with nine regulatory requirements. These related to the welfare, health and safety of pupils and the premises of and accommodation at schools.  An action plan was prepared by the school to address the regulatory failures. The Department for Education rejected the action plan. This was because the plan only addressed one of the

p.1

Context of the inspection

regulations that the school did not meet.  Since the previous inspection, the school has notified the Department for Education that it has closed one of its four sites. The Wellingborough site was closed in September 2014. As the Northampton site met all of the regulations at the previous inspection, this present inspection included visits to the sites at Kettering and Corby.  The school has applied for a material change in respect of an increase in pupil numbers at the Kettering site from a maximum of 34 to a maximum of 50. This is because the school has relocated from the ground floor of its former location to the first floor, which offers more spacious accommodation. The suitability of the school’s facilities to accommodate this change were considered during the present inspection visit. As the school does not meet all regulatory requirements, the change is not recommended for approval.  This was the first visit to the school to check on its progress in making the necessary

p.1

Context of the inspection

improvements to meet the regulatory requirements.  The inspection was carried out without notice.

p.1

Welfare, health and safety

 The inspection of June 2014 found that there were a few shortcomings in relation to the school’s policies and procedures for ensuring the health and safety of students. These mostly related to the Wellingborough site, which is now closed. However, inspectors observed a range of situations at the new site in Kettering and existing site in Corby which posed risks to students’ welfare, health and safety. These included: electric cables not being secured on the floor and presenting a trip hazard; refuse bins that were overflowing because they had not been emptied, presenting both a trip and fire hazard; and a lack of hygiene in areas where food is prepared. Consequently, this requirement is not met. Monitoring report: Education & Youth Services Ltd, 10 December 2014 2 of 7

p.1

Welfare, health and safety

 The inspection of June 2014 found that the fire safety arrangements met requirements at Northampton, Corby, and the former site at Kettering, but not in Wellingborough. Inspectors found that the Corby site has received an external evaluation by the fire brigade and its policies and procedures reacting to fire safety were deemed to be secure. However, the fire safety regulations are not met at the new site in Kettering. Despite the leader of the centre conducting a fire risk assessment, the report is inaccurate in its conclusions. This is because: one of three fire exits has a coded lock on the inside which is not known by students, thus restricting their route in case of a fire; a second fire exit has combustible materials stored underneath the stairwell which acts as an evacuation route; and additional fire extinguishers, that the leader of the centre confirmed had come from the Wellingborough site, are stored in cupboards and have

p.2

Welfare, health and safety

either not been checked, are out-of-date or require disposing of. Moreover, the signage and location of fire extinguishers is not made clear. There are some fire extinguishers that are stored upright on the floor while others do not sit on the hooks that are provided. Hence, in the event of a fire, these shortcomings present barriers to ensuring the safety of students and staff.

p.2

Welfare, health and safety

 The inspection of June 2014 found that arrangements for first aid met requirements at Northampton, Wellingborough and the former site at Kettering, but not at Corby. This was because at the time there was only one first aider at the centre, and no cover was available for staff absence. This has been remedied. The leader of the centre has ensured that there are two first-aid-trained members of staff at the Corby Centre. However, the signage around the school communicates the incorrect name of the second member of the first aid team. At the new site in Kettering, arrangements for first aid do not meet requirements. The first aid policy has many shortcomings. There is no guidance on securing effective hygiene procedures in the case of spillage of blood or bodily fluid. Also, it is unclear about what levels of injury are to be treated on site and what injuries would necessitate support from the emergency or medical services.

p.2

Welfare, health and safety

First aid kits at both sites are unsuitable. This is because they include out-of-date contents and opened dressings and sterilised materials. The procedures for recording and following up accidents are not robust. There are two accident forms which have been completed and torn out of the book with no evidence of how these are followed up. The leader of the centre does send in monthly returns on incidents to the regional office of the proprietor, but these do not necessarily include accident reporting forms.

p.2

Welfare, health and safety

 The inspection of June 2014 found that arrangements for maintaining attendance registers in accordance with regulations did not meet requirements at the sites in Corby and Wellingborough. Scrutiny of the attendance registers on the present inspection visit revealed shortcomings at both the Corby and new Kettering sites. Despite having a clear system for the correct coding for students’ attendance in the frontispiece of each register, the system is not being followed correctly. As a result, a minority of students, when they do not attend, have the part or full sessions coloured in as a block rather than the correct code being used. This process is also completed in advance at the Corby site, rather than at the time of their attendance or otherwise. The afternoon register was not completed for the afternoon session when scrutinised at 14.30 p.m. on the day of the inspection. At both sites, a minority of students have long

p.2

Welfare, health and safety

sequences of unauthorised absence which are not followed up. As a result, the local authority is not being informed when students have periods of continuous absence. The requirement in relation to attendance is not met.

p.2

Welfare, health and safety

 During the present inspection, it was found that while there is a written policy in place for child protection, there are anomalies within the document. The destination of referrals and reporting arrangements make reference to different local authorities. The school’s procedures for safer recruitment that are documented in the policy are not being implemented in practice. There are examples where recently appointed members of staff have not undergone the appropriate checks relating to ‘prohibition from teaching’. Consequently, the requirement in relation to child protection procedures is not met. Monitoring report: Education & Youth Services Ltd, 10 December 2014 3 of 7

p.2

Premises and the school accommodation

 The inspection of June 2014 found weaknesses in the arrangements for ensuring that suitable toilet and washing facilities were provided for the sole use of students. The new site in Kettering has a sufficient number of toilets for student’s use; however, these are not maintained in a hygienic state. In the toilet ascribed for male students, there are no paper towels or hand driers. Toilets at both sites have shared fabric towels which present a risk to students’ health and safety. The disabled toilet at the Kettering site has a durable lock; however, this is at an inappropriate height for ease of use. The toilet facilities at Corby, especially for male students, are poorly cleaned and unhygienic. As a result, this requirement is not met.

p.3

Premises and the school accommodation

 The inspection of June 2014 found weaknesses in the extent to which the school’s accommodation and facilities were maintained to a standard to ensure the health, safety and welfare of students. At both the new Kettering site and at Corby, the kitchen areas are not kept in a hygienic state. At Corby, the cooker had not been cleaned and contained remnants of previously cooked food on the shelves of the oven and a baking tray. At Kettering, in the kitchen area, the sinks are not kept in a clean state and are used for a variety of purposes. There is no rolling programme for the checking of portable electrical appliances, and a small minority of devices have not been checked.

p.3

Premises and the school accommodation

 The inspection of June 2014 found that there was not an adequate supply of hot and cold water for students. While at Corby, students are provided with individual bottles of water daily, currently at Kettering there is no facility for students to access drinking water. A water fountain was in place; however, this has recently been removed and is in the process of being replaced. Hence, the requirement is not met.

p.3

Premises and the school accommodation

 The inspection of June 2014 found the temperature of the water at the Corby site posed a scalding risk both in the kitchen and toilet areas. The proprietor has ensured that the boiler has been repaired by a heating engineer and this has remedied the problem. However, the new site at Kettering has the same issue and students are at risk of being scalded. The requirement is not met.

p.3

Premises and the school accommodation

 The inspection of June 2014 found that there was a lack of suitable space for students to undertake recreation activity. Both centres have designated and appropriately resourced internal areas where students can take part in social activities. At the new Kettering site, although there is no assigned outdoor space, appropriate use is made of a local park and nearby specialist facility for physical education. However, the outdoor area at Corby poses significant risks to students’ health and safety. The grassed area which is occasionally used for informal football activities contains a number of trip hazards including some wooden stakes which protrude from the ground and previously paved section that contains loose pieces of concrete and stone. The adjacent hard-surfaced area contains a significant amount of cigarette butts and litter which are not placed in a bin, making the area unsightly and unhygienic. Consequently, this requirement is

p.3

Premises and the school accommodation

 During the present inspection, it was found that students at the new Kettering site access outdoor physical education at both the Kettering Leisure Village and at a local park. At the park, students are involved in team game activities, such as football. While students can access changing accommodation and shower facilities when they are at the Leisure Village, no such arrangements are in place when they undertake physical education in the nearby park. Consequently, the requirement in relation to the school providing suitable changing accommodation and showers is not met.

p.3

Premises and the school accommodation

 During the present inspection, it was found that at the new site in Kettering the accommodation for treating sick or injured students do not meet requirements. Although there is a room where Monitoring report: Education & Youth Services Ltd, 10 December 2014 4 of 7

p.3

Premises and the school accommodation

students who are sick or injured can receive a medical examination or treatment and it is in close proximity to a toilet, there is no washing facility within the room.

p.4

Premises and the school accommodation

 During the present inspection, it was found that at the new Kettering site, one of three fire exits has a coded lock on the inside whose combination is unknown to students, thus restricting their exit route in case of a fire.

p.4

(England) Regulations 2010, as amended, and associated requirements

 Ensure that the written policy for child protection makes it clear how the school is following locally agreed procedures (paragraphs 7, 7a).  Ensure that all pre-employment checks are undertaken for relevant current and new members of staff (paragraph 7b).  Ensure that the school’s written policy for health and safety is implemented (paragraph 11).  Ensure compliance with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (paragraph 13).  Ensure that the policy for first aid makes it clear what the arrangements are for dealing with spillage of blood or bodily fluid and for dealing with emergencies (paragraph 14).  Ensure that clear records are kept of accidents and that these are monitored to inform the first aid policy and promote effective practice, and that the first aid policy is improved and is implemented effectively (paragraph 14).  Maintain attendance registers in accordance with the Education (Pupil Registration) (England)

p.4

(England) Regulations 2010, as amended, and associated requirements

Regulations 2006 (paragraph 17).  Ensure that the long-term absence of individual students is followed up and, where required, reported to the appropriate authority (paragraph 17).  Ensure that arrangements are made and carried out to record the outcome of checks of the National Council for Teaching and Leadership’s prohibition of teachers list (paragraph 19(2)(a)).  Ensure that suitable toilet and washing facilities are provided for the sole use of students (paragraph 23A(1)(a)).  Ensure that the toilets for male and female students are maintained in a hygienic state (paragraphs 23A(1), 23A(1)(a)).  Ensure that suitable changing accommodation and showers are provided for pupils when they undertake all forms of physical education (paragraph 23A(1)(c)).  At the Kettering site, provide a washing facility in the room for the short-term care of sick and injured students in the new premises (paragraphs 23B(1), 23B(1)(d)).

p.4

(England) Regulations 2010, as amended, and associated requirements

 Ensure that the school’s accommodation and facilities are maintained to a sufficient standard to ensure the health, safety and welfare of students (paragraph 23C).  Ensure that the areas where food is prepared, served or consumed are kept in a hygienic state (paragraph 23C).  Ensure that portable electrical equipment is tested in line with requirements (paragraph 23C).  Ensure that the arrangements for students evacuating the building in the event of an emergency are improved (paragraph 23C).  Ensure that students have access to labelled drinking water (paragraphs 23F(1), 23F(1)(a), 23F (1)(c)).  Ensure that the temperature of hot water at the point of use does not pose a scalding risk to users (paragraph 23F(1)(d)).  Ensure that there is suitable outdoor space to enable students to play outside (paragraph 23G(1)(b)). Monitoring report: Education & Youth Services Ltd, 10 December 2014 5 of 7

p.4

Inspection team

David Carter, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Joanne Smith Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Information about this school

 Education & Youth Services is based in Northampton and is located in former office premises in the centre of the city. It was registered in May 2008 as alternative education for students aged 14 to 16 years of age who are disengaged from education or are at risk of being excluded from education as a result of behavioural difficulties or non-attendance. The provision is currently registered to provide full-time or part-time education for up to 20 boys and girls.  The school shares its premises with Foundation Learning provision for 16 to 19 years olds, operated by the same proprietor. The same staff group operates both provisions and some of the school’s lessons include students from both provisions. The proprietor maintains admission and attendance registers, recording information about all of the students on the premises.  The school aims to offer accredited qualifications and to support young people with the

p.5

Information about this school

necessary tools to succeed in life by building self-esteem; raising aspirations; promoting the development of personal and social skills; and preparing young people for further education, training or employment beyond Year 11.  Education & Youth Services, Northampton makes use of alternative provision provided by Moulton College to extend the range of vocational practical skills courses it offers.  The school, comprising the Northampton centre only, was last inspected in April 2013 where its overall effectiveness was judged to be good.  Three additional centres in Corby, Kettering and Wellingborough were approved for use by the Department for Education on 16 October 2013, although no increase in the number of students was given.  The Wellingborough site was closed in September 2014. Monitoring report: Education & Youth Services Ltd, 10 December 2014 6 of 7

p.5

School details

Unique reference number 135754 Inspection number 454991 DfE registration number 928/6070 This inspection was conducted at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. It was carried out under section 162A of the Education Act 2002, as inserted by schedule 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

School details

Type of school Secondary School status Independent school Age range of pupils 13–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 84 Number of part-time pupils 11 Proprietor Education and Youth Services Chair Amin Amiri Headteacher Matthew Clark Date of previous school inspection N/A Annual fees (day pupils) £40 per day (£70 for students with a statement of special educational needs) Telephone number 01604 639555 Email address m.clark@eys.org.uk Monitoring report: Education & Youth Services Ltd, 10 December 2014 7 of 7

p.6

School details

guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.7

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.7

School details

inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,

p.7

School details

please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.7

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion