Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Amanda Gard (lead), Alison Bradley, Helen Wiseman
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Alison Bradley, Amanda Gard, Helen Wiseman
- Postcode verified
TW1 4SX
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Better use is made of best practice in partnership schools, although establishing systems to triangulate evidence for a database of excellent practice and the use of interactive technology are still work in progress. p.3
- Leaders have high expectations of the partnership and of trainees, as do trainees of themselves and the partnership. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment20
“The NQTs observed were confident and competent teachers of phonics.” p.2Curriculum5
“Trainees’ subject knowledge is secure.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,325
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Dr Maureen Glackin Head of School St Mary’s University Twickenham Waldegrave Road Twickenham TW1 4SX
p.1
Mary’s University primary ITE partnership
Thank you for the help which you and your colleagues, trainees, newly qualified teachers (NQTs) and schools gave when Amanda Gard, Her Majesty’s Inspector, Andy Maher and Helen Wiseman, Additional Inspectors, and I conducted a monitoring inspection of your primary ITE partnership on 12 February 2015. The focus of the inspection was to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of phonics training.
p.1
Mary’s University primary ITE partnership
Having considered all of the evidence I am of the opinion that, at this time, the quality and effectiveness of phonics training are good.
p.1
Context
St Mary’s University works in partnership with up to 1,200 schools, mainly in London but as far afield as Milton Keynes and Torquay. Of these, around 450, many of which are in the immediate area, regularly have trainees on placements. The partnership offers three routes to qualified teacher status. Trainees can follow an undergraduate course leading to a Bachelor of Arts (BA Honours) in primary education. Alternatively, there is a two-year, work-based BA Honours course for trainees who already have a foundation degree in education. St Mary’s also offers full- and part- time Post Graduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) courses in primary education. At the time of the inspection there were 449 undergraduates in training. Forty nine trainees were following the work-based learning option. There were 205 postgraduate trainees, including 21 who were taking the two-year part-time route. There were also 22 trainees following a one year ‘School Direct’ programme which is
p.1
Context
based in schools. Tribal Kings Orchard 1 Queen Street St Philips Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0845 123 6001 Direct email : inspection queries@tribalgroup.co.uk FMI monitoring inspection letter
p.1
Context
Page 2 Inspectors visited four partnership schools. They observed four lessons taught by second year BA Honours trainees during the second week of their second school experience, three by NQTs and one by a recently qualified teacher. Inspectors held discussions with groups of undergraduate and postgraduate trainees and with trainees and NQTs from all routes working in partnership schools. They met with senior leaders, course leaders and link tutors at St Mary’s, and senior leaders and mentors in the schools visited. Inspectors observed two training sessions, one delivered to first year BA trainees and one to postgraduate trainees. They also reviewed a range of documentary evidence including training materials, evaluations and action plans.
p.2
Outcomes for trainees
Trainees have a good understanding of the importance of phonics in helping pupils to develop early reading and writing skills. Trainees’ subject knowledge is secure. Their command of the correct technical vocabulary and awareness of how phonics skills should be taught systematically are good. Trainees’ planning for the phonics sessions observed was detailed. Trainees used the partnership proforma well to structure lessons which followed a common format of reviewing previous learning, teaching new skills and giving pupils opportunities to apply what they have learnt. At this relatively early point in their training, trainees generally use assessment information appropriately to differentiate activities for pupils of different abilities. They are less skilled, however, at assessing pupils’ understanding or picking up misconceptions during lessons and adapting their teaching accordingly.
p.2
Outcomes for trainees
The NQTs observed were confident and competent teachers of phonics. They planned lessons carefully, based on regular assessments of what pupils already knew. NQTs’ teaching was precise and enunciation of sounds clear. The NQTs planned interesting activities and made good use of resources to motivate pupils. NQTs are more skilled at assessing pupils’ learning during lessons. They checked pupils’ skills and understanding, corrected or explained, and checked again. The pace of learning in the lessons observed was good. Pupils were developing the early reading and writing skills that will stand them in good stead for the future.
p.2
The quality of training across the partnership
The views of trainees and NQTs who spoke to inspectors about their training in phonics are in marked contrast to the NQT survey data published by the National College of Teaching and Leadership (NCTL) in recent years. Current trainees and NQTs could not imagine why the data suggest satisfaction rates below sector norms. They were very positive about their training in phonics, which matches the responses to the partnership’s recent evaluations. Most trainees completing their training in 2014 felt they had good or better training opportunities and made good or better progress in their phonics teaching during their time at St Mary’s. FMI monitoring inspection letter
p.2
The quality of training across the partnership
Page 3 Inspectors agree that the phonics training is of a high quality. Whichever route trainees follow, there is a clear focus on phonics from the start and throughout the course. Centre- and school-based training fit together well so that trainees are continuously building their knowledge and developing their experience. Expectations are high. Trainees are required to teach phonics regularly on each school experience. They are also formally observed teaching phonics at least once on each placement. Feedback from school staff is accurate and helpful. It is at its best when it is very specific about the teaching of phonics, rather than general classroom practice. All trainees are expected to exceed the minimum expectations set out in the Teachers’ Standards, including in relation to phonics, by the end of their training. There are procedures for checking on trainees’ progress and identifying and tailoring
p.3
The quality of training across the partnership
additional support or experience for those who need it. Leaders acknowledge, however, that systems to draw together information on trainees’ subject knowledge, competency and confidence in phonics and set targets could be more coherent.
p.3
The quality of training across the partnership
The English team has been strengthened by the appointment of staff with recent, relevant experience and expertise. Centre-based training gives trainees a good grounding in phonics, including familiarity with the range of commercial schemes they may come across in schools. Trainees respond well to practical sessions and those where tutors model different teaching strategies. They value opportunities to practise by teaching each other phonics. Some trainees are less enthusiastic about theoretical sessions. They do, however, generally agree that academic assignments which, for example, require them to critically debate the role of phonics are an important, if challenging, part of their professional development.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management of the ITE partnership
St Mary’s is an ambitious ITE partnership. Leaders have high expectations of the partnership and of trainees, as do trainees of themselves and the partnership. The key areas for improvement in phonics training identified at the last inspection have been tackled effectively. The expectations relating to teaching phonics on school placements have not only been formalised but have been raised. Better use is made of best practice in partnership schools, although establishing systems to triangulate evidence for a database of excellent practice and the use of interactive technology are still work in progress. Success criteria in action plans are more closely linked to improvements in trainees’ outcomes, but are not always expressed in a measurable way.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management of the ITE partnership
The commitment to continuous improvement remains strong. For example, the early literacy placement (ELP) has been introduced in Year 1 of the BA course, giving trainees an additional two weeks in school, immersed in training about the teaching and learning of early reading and writing. Regular training for link tutors to keep them up to date and abreast of current thinking includes phonics sessions. Action plans take account of national changes to the English curriculum and assessment, as FMI monitoring inspection letter
p.3
The quality of leadership and management of the ITE partnership
Page 4 well the partnership’s priorities for phonics. Leaders take responsibility for NQTs beyond the end of their training. Currently, the partnership offers ongoing support through after-school meetings, although uptake of phonics events has been limited. An online forum is under development. Leaders are sensibly keeping the training they offer in the immediate area and beyond under review, taking account of other provision. Although they feel confident they know the views of schools employing former trainees through existing communication channels, leaders are not formally collecting the views of employers as part of their self-evaluation.
p.4
The quality of leadership and management of the ITE partnership
I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your ITE partnership. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion