Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
James Brindley School
Summary
Sue Morris-King (lead), Karen Gannon, Linda McGill, Michael Best, Sue Cox
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Jan 2015
- Inspectors verified
Karen Gannon, Linda McGill, Michael Best, Sue Cox, Sue Morris-King
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
B15 2AF
- Name on report verified
James Brindley School
- URN verified
139526
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The most serious weaknesses are in the management of safeguarding and attendance. p.5
- When leaders ask staff to take action to improve their work, they do not consistently check if this action has been taken and so weaknesses remain. p.1
- Staff are not always clear about the processes for reporting concerns about a pupil’s welfare within their centre. p.5
- Senior leaders do not know enough about how well each centre runs on a day-to-day basis; they have not noticed or have not tackled some of the weaknesses. p.5
- However, this is not always the case and the academy does not consistently challenge low attendance well enough. p.6
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve pupils’ attendance by: setting high expectations for each pupil’s attendance developing a more effective range of strategies to help those pupils with low attendance to attend more frequently emphasising the importance of attendance at lessons in each of the centres celebrating good and greatly improved attendance at school and at lessons. p.4
- An external review of governance, including a specific focus on the academy’s use of the pupil premium, should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and governance may be improved. p.4
- Across the three main teaching centres there is too much variation in the quality of teaching, particularly in English and mathematics. p.7
- Expectations of what pupils can achieve in a lesson or over time are not always high enough. p.7
- This adversely affects the progress that pupils make. p.7
- Pupils’ work is not always marked, so errors and misconceptions are not noticed. p.7
- In addition, pupils are not consistently receiving the feedback they need to celebrate their successes and help them to know how to improve. p.7
- Some work is not well presented and is incomplete. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 3,233
- about usual (typical 3317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 46
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 22%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
James Brindley School Bell Barn Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2AF
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Inadequate 4 Leadership and management Inadequate 4 Behaviour and safety of pupils Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires special measures.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils’ absence from the academy is not investigated quickly enough to keep them safe. Action taken is not recorded properly or at all. Patterns of low attendance are not analysed well enough to know why they happen. Some leaders have low expectations for pupils’ attendance. The academy’s safeguarding policy is not suitable for the wide range of different needs catered for. It does not give staff enough useful information about what they should look out for. Some staff are not clear about the procedures they should follow if they are concerned about a child’s welfare. A number of pupils are only given access to half a week of education. Pupils’ progress in English and mathematics is too variable from one centre to another. Staff do not always expect high enough standards of work from pupils. Senior leaders have an unrealistic view of the academy’s effectiveness. They have not noticed or tackled some of the weaknesses in day-to-day
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
management at some of the centres. When leaders ask staff to take action to improve their work, they do not consistently check if this action has been taken and so weaknesses remain. Information about pupils’ achievement is not analysed precisely enough to know if pupils at different centres and with different needs are making enough progress. Governors do not always receive the accurate information they need in order to be able to challenge and support. The governing body is too small to cope with this large specialist academy.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
Some leaders run their centres very well and have good procedures for safeguarding and for monitoring attendance. There is some good and outstanding teaching across the centres. Pupils in hospital are skilfully supported to keep learning as much as they can while they are ill. Across the academy, pupils are sensitive to each other’s needs and support each other well. Pupils’ progress is regularly assessed and leaders work closely with staff to plan any extra help that pupils need. Many pupils make good progress with their academic work and the vast majority of older pupils gain GCSE qualifications.
p.1
Information about this inspection
The Principal was not present during the inspection. There has been an Interim Principal in post since mid-September. The inspection team liaised with the Interim Principal and the three Vice-Principals. Inspectors visited the three main teaching centres, the three major hospitals, the four specialist centres and the Pathway provision (see ‘Information about the school’). They observed lessons and tuition in classrooms and on the wards. All the Vice-Principals carried out some joint observations with inspectors. During observations and at informal times, inspectors spoke to pupils about their experiences and discussed their work with them. Inspectors held meeting with senior leaders, leaders of some of the different centres and the home tuition service, and teachers. They also held informal conversations with staff from the academy and some medical staff. They met with the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body.
p.2
Information about this inspection
The team considered 112 responses from staff to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire, and 20 responses from parents or carers on Parent View. They spoke to a small number of parents at two of the hospitals and to leaders from three mainstream schools that have links with James Brindley. Inspectors considered a wide range of written evidence, including policies, records of behaviour and attendance, safeguarding documents, the academy’s analysis of achievement and examples of pupils’ work.
p.2
Inspection team
Sue Morris-King, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.2
Full report
In accordance with the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.
p.3
Information about this school
James Brindley School converted to become an academy in the spring term 2013. When the predecessor school was last inspected by Ofsted in 2008, it was judged to be outstanding. The academy has a number of centres catering for pupils with a wide range of needs, mainly related to medical or mental health conditions. The centres are spread across Birmingham. One hundred and ninety-six pupils are registered only at James Brindley. They attend one of three teaching centres: Dovedale, Parkway and Northfield. There are few primary-aged pupils and more than half the pupils are in Key Stage 4. Around a third of pupils who are single registered have a statement of special educational needs. Around three quarters are white British, and a quarter are from a range of minority ethnic backgrounds. A small number are looked after by a local authority. Not quite half are eligible for the pupil premium, the additional government funding for disadvantaged pupils and those who
p.3
Information about this school
are looked after. Dovedale has pupils from Key Stages 2 to 4, and caters for pupils with autistic spectrum disorder. Parkway and Northfield are for Key Stages 3 and 4 pupils with medical needs. Most of the other pupils are dual registered with their main school. These pupils are either in hospital or are resident in a specialist centre for a period of time. The academy has around 200 pupils at any one time at Birmingham Children’s Hospital, smaller numbers at Heartlands Hospital and The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, and sometimes pupils at the Queen Elizabeth and City Hospitals. The specialist centres, Oleaster, Newbridge and Ardenleigh each cater for up to 20 pupils with a range of mental health needs. The Willows takes around 35 pupils. If Early Years Foundation Stage children are at hospital they receive some teaching, as appropriate. The hospitals and specialist centres also teach post-16 students as necessary.
p.3
Information about this school
The proportions of pupils from minority ethnic groups, with special educational needs or who are looked after in the hospitals and specialist centres varies from one week to another. A small number of pupils who were previously taught at home, some of whom are dual registered and some of whom are single registered, attend Pathways for half of each week. They do not attend any other provision during the week. Over 100 pupils are taught in their homes by the James Brindley home tuition service. James Brindley is a teaching school. Various senior leaders are national or specialist leaders of education (NLEs or SLEs).
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that the procedures for safeguarding are equally good across all centres by: making sure that non-attendance is always followed up swiftly, that very prompt action is taken when a pupil’s whereabouts are not known, and that all actions are clearly recorded tailoring the safeguarding policy so that it deals specifically with the needs of the different groups of pupils who are taught by the academy ensuring that all staff know the procedures to follow and who to go to at their own centre when they have a concern about a pupil’s wellbeing making sure that governors know how effective safeguarding procedures are at each centre minimising the use of part-time timetables at all centres reviewing the Pathways programme so that pupils have access to full-time education, or as close as their medical needs allow, in line with statutory guidance. Improve the quality of leadership and management, including governance, by:
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
ensuring that all safeguarding procedures are effective, including those for following up non-attendance accurately analysing pupils’ attendance at each centre and the reasons for non-attendance thoroughly analysing the work of each centre so that strengths can be maximised, and relevant actions planned and implemented consistently following up monitoring and evaluation activities to ensure that the actions that have been identified for staff to take have been taken ensuring that information about pupils’ achievement is analysed precisely in order to know if pupils at different centres, with different needs and staying for different lengths of time, are making enough progress ensuring that governors receive full, accurate and timely information about all aspects of the academy’s work, particularly safeguarding, attendance and achievement, so that they can provide more effective challenge and support
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
seeking to expand the governing body so that they can distribute tasks and gather first-hand evidence of the effectiveness of each centre.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve pupils’ attendance by: setting high expectations for each pupil’s attendance developing a more effective range of strategies to help those pupils with low attendance to attend more frequently emphasising the importance of attendance at lessons in each of the centres celebrating good and greatly improved attendance at school and at lessons.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching and thereby the outcomes for pupils, particularly in English and mathematics, by: consistently using assessment information as well as a range of monitoring information to identify aspects of teachers’ work that need improvement, and supporting and challenging teachers in a focused way so that these improvements happen ensuring that all teachers expect consistently high standards of effort and presentation from pupils making sure that marking is frequent enough, helps pupils to feel proud of what they have achieved and lets them know what they need to do to improve ensuring that all learning environments across all centres are of an equally high standard and support learning.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of governance, including a specific focus on the academy’s use of the pupil premium, should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and governance may be improved.
p.4
The leadership and management are inadequate
The academy evaluates itself as outstanding. This is not accurate. Each of the centres functions quite independently and the effectiveness of each is too dependent on the centre leader. This has led to too much variability.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
There are flaws in some of the day-to-day management of centres. Senior leaders do not know enough about how well each centre runs on a day-to-day basis; they have not noticed or have not tackled some of the weaknesses.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
The most serious weaknesses are in the management of safeguarding and attendance. While most centres follow up absence at once and record their actions, some do not. Not all leaders understand the importance of making sure that, as far as possible, all pupils (and especially those who are a child protection concern) are safe when they are absent or go missing from school. Poor or non-existent record keeping in some instances adds to the risk as colleagues are unable to ascertain what actions have been taken.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
Staff are not always clear about the processes for reporting concerns about a pupil’s welfare within their centre. The safeguarding policy was out of date at the start of the inspection. A revised policy is too generic and does not recognise the different and special needs of the academy’s pupils with respect to safeguarding. No reference is made to the separate safeguarding policies of the hospitals and specialist centres, all of which are different.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
Pupils who attend Pathways only have provision for half of the week. This programme does not allow them to access more education on a flexible basis, according to their health, and raises concerns about their safety when they are not in school.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
Senior leaders monitor and evaluate the work of the academy in a range of ways. However, they do not check thoroughly enough whether anything has changed as a result of their monitoring.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
A small minority of staff and leaders feel unclear about the direction of the academy or feel that they have been unsupported in their work in the past. These concerns and different views are beginning to cause some tension at different levels of the organisation. However, many staff express very positive views about working at the academy.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
Pupils’ progress is assessed regularly across the main teaching centres, together with the hospital and specialist centres. This information is gathered systematically and used well by leaders to set individual goals for pupils. It is not analysed well enough by senior leaders to give detailed information about groups of pupils or the performance of different subjects across different centres.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
There are examples of some innovative and effective practice at different centres. Some centre leaders, supported by other senior leaders, set high standards for the wellbeing and achievement of their pupils. They have good, robust systems and processes to ensure that these standards are reached. The curriculum, particularly in the hospitals, is often carefully designed to meet pupils’ needs. It includes appropriate provision to prepare pupils for life in modern Britain.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
The primary school physical education and sport funding is being spent well to improve pupils’ involvement with and enjoyment of sport. Pupil premium funding is largely spent on staffing but is not always targeted to the pupils who are eligible. No evaluation of Year 7 catch-up funding was available.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
Inspectors strongly recommend that the academy should not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
The governance of the school: Governors have not ensured that safeguarding policies and procedures are secure. They have not had the training they need to help them to understand achievement and attendance, and what these might reasonably look like in this setting. Governors do not always receive the information they need from leaders in a form that will help them to know how good each aspect of the academy is. Nevertheless, they do ask leaders some challenging questions about how well the academy is performing. They have questioned leaders’ evaluation of the academy’s overall effectiveness. There are several vacancies on the governing body and the current number of governors is too few for this complex multi-site organisation. This has limited the extent to which governors know each of the centres. The Chair and other governors have worked hard to recruit more governors but this has not yet been successful.
p.5
The leadership and management are inadequate
The governing body knows how the pupil premium and other additional funding is spent but does not discuss how it will be allocated at the outset. Governors are involved in the performance management of staff. The Chair appropriately challenges or supports decisions about pay rises on the basis of the evidence provided.
p.6
Behaviour
Pupils who attend the three main teaching centres generally have positive attitudes to their learning. Many make significant improvements with their confidence and their ability to work with others once they join the academy. Clear routines and expectations help pupils who need support to improve their behaviour over time.
p.6
Behaviour
At the hospitals, pupils of all ages show enormous resilience in the face of their illnesses. Many show great determination to attend their lessons and participate fully. Older pupils study hard for their examinations when they can.
p.6
Behaviour
Pupils’ needs at the specialist centres mean that behaviour can be challenging. Staff manage this skilfully and many pupils make great improvements in their behaviour towards themselves and others as their mental health improves.
p.6
Behaviour
Pupils at all centres usually show sensitivity towards each other’s conditions and individual needs.
p.6
Behaviour
Pupils appreciate and benefit from the Pupil Parliament, which includes all the James Brindley provision. They feel able to contribute to the life of the academy. One pupil, for example, explained how she had ensured that wheelchair ramps were being installed in different areas to improve life for others.
p.6
Safety
The academy’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is inadequate. This is because procedures to check where pupils are when absent or if they go missing from school are not good enough.
p.6
Safety
Some pupils at the main teaching centres have high levels of absence. Sometimes this is because of medical appointments. However, this is not always the case and the academy does not consistently challenge low attendance well enough.
p.6
Safety
Pupils, including those with high levels of anxiety, generally feel safe and quite relaxed at the teaching centres. They trust the staff and know who they can talk to if they are concerned.
p.6
Safety
In the hospitals, good attention is paid to pupils’ wellbeing and safety. A supportive environment helps them to feel that they can keep learning during their stay.
p.6
Safety
At Ardenleigh, careful risk assessments enable pupils with a high level of need to take part in a wide range of activities. Patterns of refusal to attend lessons are carefully analysed and appropriate action is taken in consultation with the medical staff. Similarly, leaders at The Willows are systematically tackling refusal to attend lessons so that pupils can keep learning during their stay. The academy has done some good work to teach pupils about, and to celebrate, individual differences. For example, pupils are taught about sexuality and gender in a way that suits their age and understanding. This helps pupils who are, or may be, lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender to feel safe at the academy.
p.6
Safety
Pupils who stay at the academy long-term are taught about e-safety.
p.7
Safety
The academy has started to pay appropriate attention to the risks associated with extremism and radicalisation.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Across the three main teaching centres there is too much variation in the quality of teaching, particularly in English and mathematics. Expectations of what pupils can achieve in a lesson or over time are not always high enough. This adversely affects the progress that pupils make.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Pupils’ work is not always marked, so errors and misconceptions are not noticed. In addition, pupils are not consistently receiving the feedback they need to celebrate their successes and help them to know how to improve. Some work is not well presented and is incomplete.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The work of teaching assistants is not always planned for, so their effectiveness in supporting learning is sometimes undermined. Where it is planned for, teaching assistants are often very effective in supporting pupils with their learning.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Small numbers of pupils at the three main sites are on part-time timetables. Teaching does not always ensure that they can keep up when they miss work.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
There is some good and outstanding teaching at all three centres. Teachers are often skilled at eliciting thoughtful responses from pupils who lack confidence, getting them to work at a good pace and helping them to interact with their peers. The best classrooms are vibrant and have a range of learning prompts such as subject specific vocabulary, though this is not consistent.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
In all the hospital centres, thoughtful teaching helps pupils to maintain a sense of normality and achievement during their stay. Staff plan carefully to meet the range of needs and cater well for the full range of ages and subjects.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The best teaching in the hospitals is highly innovative. For example, at the Children’s Hospital during the inspection a full science lesson took place in an isolation room, including experiments, even though staff had to wear gowns and gloves.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Good links are made and maintained with pupils’ main schools, which allows their learning to be continued. This is particularly valuable for children who have repeated stays in hospital and are at their own schools in between. At Heartlands, pupils are welcomed back with mobile display boards which show their work from their last stay.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Hospital routines, such as cleaning or making beds nearby, sometimes disrupt pupils’ learning when they are being taught on the wards.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
At the Children’s Hospital, the academy has access to an outdoor area for supervised play but there is not enough provision for outdoor learning for the youngest children. This does not give them the opportunity to learn outdoors frequently as they would if they were at school.
p.7
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Teaching at the specialist centres is tailored to pupils’ needs, though pupils do not all have access to full time education or as close as their medical conditions allow. This can mean that teachers have to try to cover a wide range of material in preparation for examinations in a limited time. Some excellent practice exists to help pupils to be fully involved in assessing their own work and ensuring that marking is effective. At The Willows, for example, pupils were asked to comment on the usefulness of teachers’ marking. As a result, teachers were asked to ‘write neater’ and ‘don’t write on a slant as this is difficult to read’. Teachers had taken full note of this and marking had become more effective as a result.
p.7
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
In 2014, the vast majority of the 57 Key Stage 4 pupils who were taught at one of the three main teaching centres, Pathways or the home tuition service attained five or more GCSEs at grades A* to G. Twenty five percent gained five GCSEs at grades A* to C. Not all pupils attained a GCSE grade in mathematics and English.
p.8
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The academy’s assessment of current Year 10 pupils shows that around 70% are on track to attain five or more GCSE grades at A* to G.
p.8
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
There is wide variation in the progress made by Key Stage 4 pupils in English and mathematics across the different centres during their time at the academy. Pupils at Parkway made much better progress in English than in mathematics in 2014, whereas at Northfield progress was stronger in mathematics than in English. Current progress in mathematics for Year 10 pupils is weak.
p.8
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The academy supports many other pupils during Key Stage 4, both in the hospitals and the specialist centres, and many take their GCSE examinations while at James Brindley. However, their results are sent to their main schools and James Brindley does not collect this information. The academy therefore does not know how well these pupils achieve.
p.8
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Pupils at Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3 who attend one of the three main teaching centres are making steady and often good progress across the curriculum, though there are variations from subject to subject.
p.8
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The academy’s assessment information is not broken down well enough to show how well pupils who attend Pathways achieve.
p.8
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Pupils at the hospital and specialist centres, including very young children and post-16 students, benefit from the intensive teaching they receive when they are well enough. Their achievements include: completing and sometimes excelling in GCSE and A-level examinations; gaining functional skills qualifications; keeping up with their school work so that they can easily reintegrate to their main school without falling behind; and re-learning skills, such as reading and writing, that have been lost through illness or new disabilities.
p.8
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium and those who have special educational needs achieve as well as their peers.
p.8
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The most-able pupils generally achieve well. Sometimes therapeutic or medical interventions rightly need to take priority over academic study for a while in order to help them to recover.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing
p.9
Grade Judgement Description
to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.9
School details
Unique reference number 139526 Local authority Birmingham Inspection number 449945
p.10
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.10
School details
Type of school All-through School category Academy special converter Age range of pupils 2–19 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 563 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Claire Marshall Principal Nicky Penny (Principal) John Bradshaw (Interim Principal) Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 0121 666 6409 Fax number 0121 666 6409 Email address bradshawj@jamesbrindley.bham.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.11
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.11
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.11
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion