Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Keys Care Limited in Cambridgeshire

Inspected — · published 27 Feb 2015 · URN SC370910

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gwen Buckley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Gwen Buckley

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • URN verified

    SC370910

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+29Mostly positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandinghigh qualityimproved
Criticismdeclinedlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings60w+20
  • What needs to improve125w+25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
184
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 30, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 77%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC370910 Inspector Gwen Buckley Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Registered person BetterCare Keys Limited Registered person address Laganwood House 44 Newforge Lane Belfast BT9 5NW Responsible individual Heather Ann Laffin Registered manager POST VACANT Date of last inspection 05/11/2014 2 of 5 Inspection date 04/02/2015

p.1

Previous inspection outstanding Enforcement action since last inspection none

p.2

This inspection

This home was judged outstanding at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .

p.2

This inspection

This inspection focused on the progress young people have made in the home since the last full inspection in November 2014. No requirement or recommendations were made at that time. The Registered Manager has recently left. The new manager is an experienced care worker and knows the young people well as she was previously the deputy manager. She is in the process of applying to Ofsted for registration. This provides continuity of care for young people.

p.2

This inspection

The new manager has a good understanding of safeguarding procedures and has very good links with local police and the local area designated officer, which promotes young people's safety. With her new role, comes the expectation that she will be the designated person. Although she is aware of the actions to take if there is an allegation against staff she has not attended training. The local police officer stated that there is an excellent working relationship with the home and the young people engage with him at different levels. This ranges from taking a young person and her key worker to visit a local club, to see if it is an activity the young person would like to take part in, to regular informal discussions with young people on a variety of topics.

p.2

This inspection

Young people spoken with during the inspection stated they feel safe in the home and know bullying is not tolerated. The progress young people make is varied, some are engaging very well and making good progress towards independence and others are not settled or engaging effectively in education. Highly personalised care planning, by staff who know young people well and fully involve them in the process, ensures the young people feel valued and cared for.

p.2

This inspection

Clear boundaries are in place; as a result young people know what is expected of them. Very few sanctions are imposed and no restraints have taken place since the last inspection. Staff emphasise and focus on the positive behaviour and regularly 3 of 5 reward good behaviour.

p.2

This inspection

The provision of constructive activities that reflects individual interests and good management of leisure time keeps the young people occupied. Young people feel they have someone they can talk with if they are upset or concerned. One young person said: ‘I can talk to my key worker or any staff.’ Staff stated: ‘With the team support, young people are involved in day to day decisions; it feels comfortable and safe for both young people and staff.’

p.3

This inspection

Internal and external monitoring of the service ensures detailed reports are produced, which shows an excellent understanding of how the home is operating and how it plans to develop practice. The quarterly reports produced include the views of placing social workers, parents or children. These views are obtained in various ways and are continually positive. 4 of 5

p.3

Information about this children’s home

This children’s home, owned by a private company, is registered for three young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties, aged between 11 and 17 years.

p.4

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

05/11/2014 Full outstanding 29/01/2014 Interim satisfactory progress 26/06/2013 Full outstanding 20/12/2012 Interim good progress

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure staff receive high quality training to enhance their individual skills and to keep them up-to-date with professional and legal developments. This relates to the provision of designated person training. (NMS 18) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.4

Recommendations

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.5

What inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion