Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Brookfield House in Stockport
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectors verified
Paul Scott
- Previous overall verified
Outstanding
- URN verified
SC008484
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. p.6
- At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.6
- This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 236
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC008484 Inspector Paul Scott Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Registered manager Judith Kathleen Power Date of last inspection 27/08/2014 2 of 6 Inspection date 02/02/2015
p.1
Previous inspection outstanding Enforcement action since last inspection There has been no enforcement action since the last inspection.
p.2
This inspection
This home was judged outstanding at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .
p.2
This inspection
The recommendation from the previous inspection has been suitably addressed. The systems for the management and notification of serious incidents are now consistently applied. This ensures that relevant parties are kept informed, updated and involved when significant events occur.
p.2
This inspection
Young people continue to benefit from a high standard of care. They talk positively about living at the home and are clearly settled in their placement. Several young people spoke about the progress they have made and how they benefit from the support provided by staff. Young people demonstrate a sense of stability which has contributed to improved outcomes in many aspects of their lives, including education, behaviour, relationships and contact.
p.2
This inspection
The home is in the process of changing its management arrangements. The deputy manager has submitted an application to be registered with Ofsted as the Registered Manager for this service. This is to accommodate the planned resignation of the current Registered Manager, who is also the responsible individual. In preparation for this change the deputy manager is assuming overall responsibility for the day-to- day management of the home. This shows good planning and a clear commitment to ensuring the transition from one manager to another is as seamless as possible and does not impact negatively on young people.
p.2
This inspection
There have been a number of changes to the staffing arrangements in the home. Three new staff have been recruited to replace the three staff who have left. Recruitment has been thorough, ensuring all staff are checked and vetted and have the right skills and commitment to work with vulnerable young people. Existing staff, including managers, have demonstrated their commitment to providing young people with continuity of care. For example, shortfalls have been covered from 3 of 6 within the team which means young people continue to be cared for by staff with whom they are familiar.
p.2
This inspection
Two young people have left the home since the last inspection, one being a planned and well supported transition to a foster placement. Young people's needs are given the highest priority. Managers are quick to recognise when placements are not working and young people's needs cannot be met. This has resulted in one young person's placement being ended due to the impact their behaviour was having on the other young people. Managers worked closely with the young person's placing authority and family to ensure the transition to return home was as smooth as possible.
p.3
This inspection
There has been significant delay in identifying an independent regulation 33 visitor. There is a strong commitment to ensuring the appointed person has the right skills, credentials and experience for the role. This means that there have been no external monitoring visits for a significant period of time. A person has now been recruited and will begin to undertake monthly monitoring visits once relevant recruitment checks are complete. This shortfall has been offset to some extent by the improved internal quality assurance processes. Managers routinely and rigorously monitor young people's care, their records and conduct in the home. When shortfalls are identified they are quickly addressed with a clear commitment on improving the quality of care provided for young people.
p.3
This inspection
Young people benefit from being cared for by committed and caring staff who clearly have their best interests at heart. Relationships are exceedingly positive and based on good parenting and family values. Care planning and care practice is highly individualised. Staff take time to get to know and understand young people and every effort is made to ensure staff have current and up-to-date skills and knowledge through discussion, supervision and training. This means young people's risks and vulnerabilities are effectively managed and their known and emerging needs are met. For example, the majority of staff have recently completed self-harm training in response to young people's specific needs. However, one member of staff has not completed this training. This lack of knowledge and understanding has the potential to compromise the safety and wellbeing of young people who display self- harming behaviour.
p.3
Information about this children’s home
This is a private children’s home; the owner is also the Registered Manager. The home provides care for up to six young people with emotional or behavioural difficulties or learning disabilities.
p.4
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
27/08/2014 Full outstanding 11/02/2014 Interim good progress 06/11/2013 Full good 27/02/2013 Interim good progress
p.4
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.4
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) ensure visits by the independent person under paragraph (1) shall take place at least once a month and may be unannounced. (Regulation 33(7)) 01/03/2015
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure staff are equipped with the skills required to meet the needs of children; specifically that all staff complete training in the management of self-harming behaviour. (NMS 18.1) 5 of 6 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.4
Recommendations
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.6
What inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion