Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Feb 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Evans

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Evans

  • Postcode verified

    NE29 7BU

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingclearpositiveeffectiverobustconsistentlyaccurateclearly
Criticismnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings165w0
  • Leadership386w+74

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
546
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 28%Leadership 66%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Mrs Tracy Hush Headteacher Norham High School Alnwick Avenue North Shields Tyne and Wear NE29 7BU

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Norham High School

Following my visit to your school on 2 February 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Norham High School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in November 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and senior leaders, a group of middle leaders, a group of governors and a representative of the local authority. The inspector also met with the staff. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s action plan were evaluated. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566863 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email : jbennett@cfbt.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

 The headteacher, with extensive support from the governing body and the local authority, has responded to the findings from the recent inspection. The school is now taking appropriate action to address the points for improvement identified in the recent inspection report.  The school’s action plan provides clear strategic direction for the work being done and contains appropriate benchmarks to check on progress. However, the plan does not identify clearly who is responsible for leading each action and who is responsible for assessing the impact of these actions.  A positive start has been made with effective support from Churchill Community College, a local outstanding school, and the local authority. Leaders at the school have introduced more robust systems for ensuring that teachers’ judgements about students’ work are more consistently accurate. These more accurate assessments now play a key role in

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

discussions that senior staff have with teachers about the progress students are making. They help staff identify more quickly where additional support needs to be put in place so that students can make better progress, although these are early days in this new way of working.  The roles of middle leaders still need further development. Middle leaders are now more closely involved in monitoring the work of teachers and other adults in their teams. However, more needs to be done to ensure that middle leaders have the skills to hold teams and individual staff members to account for the quality of their work.  Governors have a clear sense of what needs to be done to ensure that the school improves rapidly. They have refocused their committee structure to reflect the key priorities from the inspection report more clearly. They have also undertaken an audit of governors’ skills. As a result, new members have been invited to join the governing body

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

who can add a particular set of skills and insights which will enhance governor capacity to oversee improvements.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s action plan is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Head of Children, Young People and Learning for North Tyneside. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion