Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Feb 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joanne Olsson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joanne Olsson

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−12Mixedmore positive than 18% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectiveconfidentaccurateimprovingstrengthsclearclearly
Criticismweaknessesgapsshortcomingsdisruptiontoo fewslowyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,535
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566850 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: dmccarrick@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr Mike Mitchell Headteacher Seven Stars Primary School Upton Peacock Hall Road Leyland Lancashire PR25 1TD

p.1

School, Lancashire

Following my visit to your school on 28 January 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Lancashire

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Lancashire

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School, Lancashire

 ensure the weight of responsibility for driving improvement is shared more evenly by: - helping subject leaders put their recent training into action quickly so they are driving improvements to teaching across the school - organising an external review of governance to help governors form a clear plan of action to improve their effectiveness  tackle the weaknesses in pupils’ handwriting and spelling so gaps in basic skills close quickly and ensure pupils have more opportunities to write at length  tighten the strategies to support the current Year 6 class to help these pupils reach their challenging targets.

p.1

Evidence

During my visit, meetings were held with you, five senior and middle leaders, two members of the governing body and two representatives from the local authority. I also chatted to a small group of older pupils to gather their views about the changes in the school. The school improvement plan was evaluated. I considered your most recent school information on pupils’ achievement, including the 2014 unvalidated results for Year 2 and Year 6. I also looked at records of your checks on teaching and a sample of minutes from governing body meetings. We visited each classroom to talk to pupils, observe them at work and to look at their books.

p.2

Context

Since the October inspection, the deputy headteacher and the Reception teacher have left the school. The Year 6 teacher is on extended leave. A new Reception teacher and two temporary teachers took up post in January 2015.

p.2

Main findings

You have not wasted any time in getting to grips with the findings from the recent inspection. You set about tackling the key shortcomings as soon as the inspectors left your school in October. Despite almost half of the teaching staff joining the school in January, you are not using this as an excuse. Disruption in staffing is not getting in the way of improving teaching and lifting pupils’ achievement. As a result, you are laying the foundations on which to build future success. Your well written action plan shows you know what to do to bring about improvement. Your planned actions to improve teaching and leadership are spot-on and you are using the wide range of external support wisely to help you move forward.

p.2

Main findings

You know the inspection judgement is accurate; not everyone is as convinced. Nonetheless, staff and governors are pulling together towards a common goal. They are confident you can lead the way and everyone is on board for the journey ahead. You know there is a need for change. You are under no illusions that continuing with strategies that have not brought about success in the past will not serve the school well in the future. Nevertheless, you are carrying a heavy burden; responsibility for improving the school is not spread evenly among all leaders. This has not held you up in the short term. However, in the long term, this poses a potential barrier to the school’s speedy recovery.

p.2

Main findings

Your work to date is beginning to reap rewards. Recent changes to the Early Years Foundation Stage mean children are more interested in their learning inside and outside of the classroom. Teachers’ subject knowledge in mathematics has been refreshed along with whole-school policies for teaching number. Consequently, pupils are more confident in tackling calculations and achievement in mathematics is beginning to rise in most classes. Almost all teachers are striving to follow the updated marking policy. However, there is still a way to go to make sure all teachers provide pupils with meaningful next steps to help them improve their learning. You are setting your stall out clearly for teachers. The renewed teaching policy lays out your expectations of teaching staff and what should happen in classrooms each and every day. Some teachers have got the message quickly. In these classes, pupils work purposefully, produce quality work and make strong gains in their learning. Not

p.2

Main findings

all teachers are getting to grips with the new way of working as swiftly. Some pupils are not expected to work hard enough for their age or ability. You are helping teachers to raise their game through suitable training and opportunities for staff to work together to share their expertise. New teachers are being brought into the fold quickly, but there is more to do to ensure everyone is following the Seven Stars approach to teaching and learning.

p.3

Main findings

You current data on pupils’ achievement show the tide is turning and more pupils are making expected progress. Nonetheless, there is a long haul ahead to wipe out the bumpy ride pupils typically experience as they move throughout school. In some classes pupils forge ahead quickly, making strong gains in their learning; in other classes they tread water. Year 6 pupils are getting close attention, but their books show they have quite a journey to make if they are to reach their challenging end of year targets. Across the rest of the school, some pupils are living with gaps in their spelling and handwriting skills which are holding them back. Pupils’ success in writing is hampered by too few opportunities to write at length.

p.3

Main findings

Subject leaders are receiving extensive support and training to build their confidence and gain the skills for the job. They are beginning to get to grips with performance data and they have an accurate view of the strengths and weaknesses in their subject areas. However, they are only just off the starting blocks in their efforts to improve teaching. The English and mathematics subject leaders are checking pupils’ books more closely, but this strategy is not getting to the heart of the matter. This is because subject leaders focus too much on whether teachers are following policies rather than examining the quality of pupils’ learning over time. The feedback teachers receive is not sharp enough to help them improve their teaching skills. Subject leaders do not go back and make sure their advice and guidance is being followed by all teachers.

p.3

Main findings

The governing body are showing their determination to improve through the time and energy they are investing in training to extend their skills. As a result, they have a better grasp of school data which is helping them to ask more searching questions than in the past. Nonetheless, they have been slow to get going in other areas. The special committee they have set up to keep an eye on the school’s progress is yet to meet. They have not taken enough responsibility for planning the actions they will take to improve governance. Governors are in the very early stages of setting up the procedures for visiting school more frequently to gather their own first-hand evidence of progress. Recent changes to the governing body means the time is right for governance to be externally reviewed.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority responded quickly to the inspection judgement to ensure you have the right support to aid the school’s recovery. Support is extensive and effective because it is matched closely to the school’s weaknesses and adds value to your action plan. You appreciate and trust the advice of local authority officers who are standing shoulder-to-shoulder with you on your journey. The work of officers with early years expertise has helped to get the much needed improvements in the Early Years Foundation Stage off to a good start. Subject leaders are benefitting from training and the opportunity to work with their counterparts in your partner school. A teaching and learning audit led by the local authority has helped everyone gain an accurate view of teaching and ensure training is matched to individual need. The support from the two officers working closely with your school is making a difference because both understand their role. As a result, there are no mixed

p.4

External support

messages. Both officers are willing to roll-up their sleeves and help. Equally, they are not afraid to ask challenging questions to make you rethink your actions or to tackle any signs of progress faltering.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Lancashire.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion