Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Keys Care Limited in Leicestershire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectors verified
Philip Cass
- URN verified
SC063997
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. p.5
- At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.5
- This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection. p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 171
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 28, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC063997 Inspector Philip Cass Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Registered person BetterCare Keys Limited Registered person address Laganwood House 44 Newforge Lane Belfast BT9 5NW Responsible individual Heather Ann Laffin Registered manager Amanda Jayne Williams Date of last inspection 16/07/2014 2 of 5 Inspection date 15/01/2015
p.1
Previous inspection adequate Enforcement action since last inspection none
p.2
This inspection
This home was judged adequate at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .
p.2
This inspection
The home continues to ensure that young people are safe and adequately cared for. Safeguarding procedures are well understood by staff and minimise the risk of abuse. Young people say that the home is ‘ok’. They say that staff are supportive and helpful. Young people admitted recently compare the home favourably to previous placements Social workers report that they ‘couldn’t have asked for more’ from the home.
p.2
This inspection
Young people continue to make some progress towards the objectives of their care plans. Following the last inspection, the home enjoyed a period of stability. The home became a calmer and more nurturing environment. However this improvement was not sustained. The well-being and achievement of some young people continues to be limited by risk taking behaviour, anti-social behaviour, and placement breakdown.
p.2
This inspection
One recommendation was made at the previous inspection. This has been addressed. Staff no longer carry out restraint unless they are trained appropriately. This reduces the risk of injury.
p.2
This inspection
Leaders and managers routinely monitor the quality of care and professional practice in the home. Managers understand how the home needs to improve in order to deliver a consistently good standard of care. The independent visitor states that the manager is committed to making the home better. Although the home’s development plan is not currently a useful tool because it is out of date, steps have been taken that are likely to generate stronger outcomes for young people. For example, staff have been provided with additional training. In addition, performance management systems are now used more robustly. However, these efforts have not 3 of 5 yet generated meaningful improvements.
p.2
This inspection
Managers have also made efforts to strengthen the staff team by recruiting experienced staff with a proven track record in residential care. These efforts were not immediately successful but are ongoing. The home continues to rely heavily on agency staff to ensure sufficient staffing numbers. Some staff continue to be unable to consistently enforce boundaries. In recent weeks recruitment efforts have been more effective. While this has not yet generated obvious improvements, managers are optimistic that they now employ sufficiently skilled and experienced staff.
p.3
This inspection
Young people continue to make some educational progress. Managers have made stronger efforts to support school attendance and achievement. They have developed relationships with a number of specialist education providers. This means that a wider range of options are available to young people who do not cope in mainstream education settings. However, attendance remains sporadic for many young people. Most still do not have access to full time programmes of education. This limits their ability to gain qualifications and achieve strong outcomes. 4 of 5
p.3
Information about this children’s home
This privately owned children's home provides accommodation for three young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties. The provider organisation operates nationally, providing a range of care services for children and young people.
p.4
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
16/07/2014 Full adequate 04/06/2014 Full inadequate 27/02/2014 Interim inadequate progress 07/08/2013 Full good
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that the registered person has a written development plan for the future of the home (NMS 15.2) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.4
Recommendations
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.5
What inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion