Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Educare Adolescent Services Limited in Staffordshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectors verified
Rachel Ruth Britten
- URN verified
SC371723
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is specifically with regard to planning for, and learning from, placement endings (NMS 1.4) p.4
- This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. p.5
- At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.5
- This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection. p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 210
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 32, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC371723 Inspector Rachel Ruth Britten Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Registered person Educare Adolescent Services Limited Registered person address Venture House 12 Prospect Business Park, Longford Road CANNOCK Staffordshire WS11 0LG Responsible individual Paul Anthony Callander Registered manager Philip Kenneth Johnson Date of last inspection 28/05/2014 2 of 5 Inspection date 22/01/2015
p.1
Previous inspection adequate Enforcement action since last inspection none
p.2
This inspection
This home was judged adequate at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has improved effectiveness .
p.2
This inspection
The home's effectiveness has improved significantly since a new manager began work in August 2014. This Registered Manager leads staff well and has placed all aspects of the home's organisation on an improved footing. Requirements and recommendations from the last inspection and from the home's monthly visitor are acted upon and kept in mind. Young people find the manager visible and approachable too. They say they like the atmosphere of the home 'much better than the last place' and they are well engaged in the running and personalisation of it. Recording systems are now well organised, understood by staff and used to underpin good quality and safe care.
p.2
This inspection
Two young people have been placed in the home and two have left, during the eight months since the last inspection. Overall, progress and experiences have been positive. Oneyoung person's social worker has complimented the quality of staff's work in helping a young person settle in. She noted early progress for the young person and put it down to good support by the staff. One young person has moved at his own request to a more urban placement. This is after over two years at the home. The manager said, 'I feel he was ready for that transition to a new location and was doing well overall. He was very emotional about moving.' Young people's moves have been adequately planned and carefully supported by staff and the manager. However, the manager did not consult with the young people who have moved, or the professionals involved with them, about their impressions of the placement. This is a missed opportunity to reflect, learn and identify points for
p.2
This inspection
Staff successfully engage and promote young people's interests and invest good amounts of quality time to promote their learning, emotional development and family relationships. Staff ensure through diligent work with teachers, tutors and work placement providers that young people's education continues, as much as 3 of 5 possible, throughout testing behaviour. Young people feel valued from the outset because they are involved, for example, in interviewing new staff and creating art work to personalise the home. Young people's weekly meetings are also working well. Meetings are centred around young people's views, wishes and feelings: these are promptly and clearly recorded and responded to in writing by the manager.
p.2
This inspection
The Registered Manager and area manager work effectively together to improve and support staff in their care practice. They are available for discussion, supervision and training. For example, they have ensured that staff receive good induction and training in areas such as self-harm and autism, de-escalation, working within local authority procedures and children's homes regulations. There is also good partnership working with in-house clinical advice, police, education and child protection teams. As a result, staff are well able to meet the specific needs of young people placed at the home and to safeguard them when incidents have occurred.
p.3
This inspection
However, a consistent staff team has not been retained over the past eight months. Agency members of staff have been required. A lack of experienced and qualified staff has meant that some shifts have been led, as well as supported, by staff from a neighbouring home. Managers minimise the number of changes by using the same agency staff and staff from other homes. Nevertheless, young people comment that they want to see their own staff. Consistency of care is held back because the home's own team has three vacancies.
p.3
This inspection
Leaders and managers use monitoring activity well, particularly in reviewing behaviour incidents. They look intelligently and creatively for patterns and trends. The home's independent monthly visitor said in December 2014, 'The manager is very proactive and positive and children's behaviour has and is continually improving.' Leaders and managers have developed strategies to minimise the triggers and/or circumstances that might contribute to young people's unsafe behaviours. This includes looking for possible links between behaviours and the individual staff on duty; the mix of young people in the house; and young people's responses to changes in their care plans or relationships with peers/family members. As a result, care planning is responsive and any risky or unsafe situations are minimised.
p.3
This inspection
As a result of this inspection, two recommendations have been made to improve staff continuity and consultation with the young people. 4 of 5
p.3
Information about this children’s home
This home is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to four young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. The home is privately owned and the organisation operates other children's homes in the area.
p.4
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
28/05/2014 Full adequate 20/01/2014 Interim inadequate progress 22/05/2013 Full good 21/01/2013 Interim satisfactory progress
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that the views of the child, the child's family, social worker and IRO are sought regularly on the child's care. This is specifically with regard to planning for, and learning from, placement endings (NMS 1.4) improve the continuity of staffing, so that children's attachments are not overly disrupted. (NMS 17.8) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.4
Recommendations
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.5
What inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion