Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Aspris Children’s Services Limited in Hampshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectors verified
Jennie Christopher
- URN verified
SC449307
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In addition indicate in records where no comment is made. p.4
- This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. p.5
- At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.5
- This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 190
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 33, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC449307 Inspector Jennie Christopher Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Registered person Priory Education Services Ltd Registered person address 5th Floor 80 Hammersmith Road London W14 8UD Responsible individual Helen Sharpe Registered manager Michelle Anne Wyatt Date of last inspection 08/05/2014 2 of 5 Inspection date 06/01/2015
p.1
Previous inspection adequate Enforcement action since last inspection none
p.2
This inspection
This home was judged adequate at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has improved effectiveness .
p.2
This inspection
The home was last inspected in May 2014, where it was judged to be adequate in all areas. The home manager, who had recently been appointed at the time of the last inspection, has since been registered. She is working tirelessly to improve the quality of care and outcomes for young people. The increasingly consistent staff team are formulating strong working models to make a positive difference to the young people living in the home. Staff comment that they feel more confident in their roles and having a consistent staff team is helping them to care effectively for young people.
p.2
This inspection
Staff are forming positive and nurturing relationships with young people. Young people are positive about the home and their relationships with staff, saying they feel ‘safe’ and they can ‘talk to staff’. The increasing consistency in approach to behaviour management helps to minimise the use of restraint. Sanctions are fair and proportionate. However, records are not always fully completed, in particular the section for young people’s views. Evaluation of significant incidents is leading to an increasingly reflective approach to managing incidents of unwanted behaviour.
p.2
This inspection
The planning process prior to young people moving into the home has improved, with the Registered Manager having greater autonomy over who is placed. The staff and management team appropriately consider group dynamics and peer relationships. Records have greatly improved and demonstrate a clear evaluation of young people’s progress and areas where they continue to require support. Some young people in the home continue to go missing, but there are close and effective working relationships with specialist police officers. Staff have benefitted from training in gangs and exploitation from an external provider, and said they found this valuable. Incidents of self-injurious behaviour have dramatically reduced overall, and for one young person have ceased. Those who are preparing for independence are developing life skills ready for their next move. One young person has moved on 3 of 5 since the last inspection, and although it was not a planned move, staff had worked
p.2
This inspection
hard to meet the individuals evolving needs prior to the end their placement.
p.3
This inspection
The suitably qualified Registered Manager effectively leads the forming staff team. Staff are now confident in their roles and key workers are knowledgeable in the progress of their key child. Partnership working has become entrenched in daily practice with communication between the home, placing authorities and other relevant services clearly documented. Requirements and recommendations made at the last inspection have all been acted upon and met to an appropriate standard. In addition, an extremely thorough lone working policy and risk assessment has been devised in line with individual staff and young people’s needs. External and managers monitoring continues to highlight areas of good practice and those that require improvement. The homes development plan reflects external and internal monitoring. Plans are clear and time limited reflecting improvements for both the fabric of the building and care experience for young people. There have been no
p.3
This inspection
complaints since the last inspection and issues within the peer group are responded to swiftly. 4 of 5
p.3
Information about this children’s home
The home is owned by a private organisation. It is registered to provide care and accommodation for seven children with emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.4
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
08/05/2014 Full adequate 07/01/2014 Interim inadequate progress 20/08/2013 Full adequate 17/05/2013 Full inadequate
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure where any sanctions, disciplinary measures or restraint are used, children are encouraged to have their views recorded in the records kept by the home. In addition indicate in records where no comment is made. (NMS 3.18) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.4
Recommendations
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.5
What inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion