Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Feb 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anne Bowyer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anne Bowyer

  • Postcode verified

    DN3 2DG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+81Very positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivevery wellimprovingstrongsecureimprovedengaging
Criticismgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
934
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Jo Campbell Headteacher Armthorpe Shaw Wood Academy Mere Lane Doncaster South Yorkshire DN3 2DG

p.1

Wood Academy, Doncaster

Following my visit to your academy on 22 January 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Wood Academy, Doncaster

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Wood Academy, Doncaster

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, the two heads of school, middle leaders and two representatives of the governing body to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The academy improvement plan was evaluated, as well as other documentation relating to this. We visited lessons to observe teaching, talk to pupils and look at their work.

p.1

Context

Since the last monitoring visit the substantive headteacher has resigned. The academy is led by you, the Executive Headteacher and two Heads of School. This forms part of the governor’s plan to secure the future leadership of the school. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566937 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :jsimmons@cfbt.com

p.1

Main findings

Teaching is improving at a pace because you and the heads of school systematically and rigorously check on the quality of teaching. From this you support and challenge teachers in a timely and proportionate manner. The focus on improving teaching is relentless, but is being managed in a way that is motivating staff to improve their practice. You are drawing upon the expertise within school as well as that of external partners. A culture of learning and improving together for the good of the pupils has developed very quickly.

p.2

Main findings

You hold staff to account more rigorously for the impact of their work through improved performance management systems. Teachers are expected to account for the progress their pupils make and explain how they will tackle any underachievement. Where necessary you provide additional support for those pupils who need it. As a result gaps in achievement are closing fast.

p.2

Main findings

The changes you have made to the curriculum in reading, writing and mathematics are further motivating and engaging pupils. Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can do, and need to do, is increasing. There is more challenge in lessons, with a focus on deepening and broadening pupils’ knowledge and understanding of what they learn. You check closely on the effectiveness of these changes and revise them when and where needed.

p.2

Main findings

Changes in how the academy manages behaviour is ensuring pupils are motivated to work hard and achieve well. Behaviour logs show a reduction in incidents and pupils feel they have a voice that is heard, respected and understood. In most classes visited, pupils were hardworking, attentive and fully engaged in their learning.

p.2

Main findings

Middle leaders are more confident and able to lead and manage improvements in teaching. They have received the training and support they need to do this. They know what impact their actions are having because, they are using a variety of tools to check on standards of teaching, the effectiveness of the curriculum and the progress pupils make. For instance, training on using work scrutiny effectively is enabling them to check more rigorously on the quality of teaching and learning over time and verify what teachers are saying about the progress pupils are making. They have observed teaching, but know this is an aspect of their work which needs further development. They are actively seeking the support and training they need for this.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has taken decisive action to secure the future of the academy. The appointment of you as executive headteacher to work with the two heads of school has provided a strong and sustainable model of leadership. Governors are very well informed about how the academy is doing and what progress is being made with the areas for improvement. They seek to check on what leaders are saying by visiting the academy regularly and by questioning. You have introduced robust systems for checking and sharing information about pupil progress which means governors are very clear about how well pupils are doing and how gaps in achievement are closing for particular year groups and groups of pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

You make effective use of the expertise in local schools to increase the knowledge and skills of leaders and teachers. Leaders have worked with two local schools to help develop skills in using work scrutiny effectively, as well as to improve specific aspects of teaching. An external consultant and a Specialist Leader of Education have supported the middle leader for mathematics to develop the curriculum and the knowledge and skills needed to lead and manage the subject effectively. Although a stand-alone academy, you have actively sought local authority support and that of the local partnership of schools for specific aspects of your work such as, the development of assessment without levels and ensuring teacher assessment is accurate.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Doncaster.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion