Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Feb 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mary Rayner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mary Rayner

  • Postcode verified

    SG2 8UT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongenthusiasticpositiveclearimprovedaccurateclearlytimely
Criticismseriousout of datenot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings335w+13
  • Leadership592w+41

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
923
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 35%Leadership 62%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Mrs Annemari Ottridge Headteacher Lonsdale School Brittain Way Stevenage SG2 8UT

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Lonsdale School

Following my visit to your school on 22–23 January 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Lonsdale School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in October 2014.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with you, members of the senior leadership team, the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority. Together we briefly visited all classrooms. I scrutinised a range of documentation, including performance review records, supervision notes and minutes of meetings. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plan were evaluated.

p.1

Context

Lonsdale school shares a building with the residential provision. Many students attend the school as well as the residential provision. This inspection related to the education provision. However, there are a number of overarching aspects of safeguarding which cover both. For example, the same senior leadership team have responsibility for both the residential and the school provision, and the school and Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9158 Direct email : rachel.dayan@serco.com residential provision share staff. Therefore, the single central record covers both the school and the residential staff. In addition, the school’s policies frequently relate to both aspects of provision.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, three senior leaders have left the school. Two existing members of school staff have been appointed temporarily as assistant headteachers for a period of two terms. You have secured the secondment of a deputy headteacher from the adjoining mainstream secondary school until July 2015. An interim head of residence has also been appointed for two terms. The school has increased the number of support staff as a result of detailed risk assessments.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Current leaders, including governors, have an enthusiastic and determined attitude to address the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. This is supporting staff in their drive and commitment to improve. Many of the actions taken are already starting to have a positive impact.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

In a short time, you have introduced systems to ensure the safeguarding of pupils. All staff are checked as required by law, have received child protection training, training in de-escalation strategies and, where appropriate, physical intervention training. The recording of interventions is now more systematic. Staff have a clear understanding of your expectations of reporting and you are monitoring the recording of serious incidents to ensure they are completed appropriately. As yet, there is no analysis of these incidents. As a result, you are not able to understand what underlies these incidents or identify actions to reduce their occurrence.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Staff feel valued and have confidence in your vision to improve provision for pupils and, therefore, to improve pupils’ progress. You have analysed the difficulties faced by the school and developed an accurate understanding of barriers to improvement. You are acting with a strong sense of urgency to reduce these. New, more decisive approaches to developing teaching and learning include an improved approach to performance management. This includes all staff who now have clear targets for their work.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have quickly introduced a programme of senior leadership meetings which are ensuring regular review of the development plan as well as the impact of the actions you are taking. You are ensuring that communication between all areas of the school is strong and that channels of communication remain open. For example, meeting notes from whole-school briefings are easily accessible to staff who could not attend the meeting. Consequently, everyone knows what is expected of them. Minutes of these meetings show that safeguarding is now given a high priority and pupil-related issues, such as communication development, are better understood by all staff. A training plan, which ensures professional development is available to all staff, has been established, along with a system to monitor the impact of training. The high attendance rates of staff at events shows their commitment and reflects their understanding that this is helping them to develop good practice.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school and local authority action plans address appropriately all the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. The plans clearly state who is responsible for leading actions and the expected outcomes. However, the planned impact on pupils’ achievement and how this will be measured is less clearly defined. A review of governance is underway.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority is providing a good level of support and challenge. Their current plan of support is ensuring that you are able to take timely and specific actions to improve the school.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The pace of change has been rapid; this means that sometimes policies have not been updated to reflect the changes made to practice. For example, the safer recruitment practices within the school are stronger but the safer recruitment policy is out of date.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

cc. Chair of the Governing Body cc. Local authority cc. The Secretary of State

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion