Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Feb 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Wendy Varney

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Wendy Varney

  • Postcode verified

    CO10 0DS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingclearstrongeffectivestrengthsimprovingsupportivepromptly
Criticismnot good enoughinconsistentnot yetnot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,143
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Toni Davis Headteacher Pot Kiln Primary School Butt Road Great Cornard Sudbury CO10 0DS

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 28 January 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. At its previous section 5 inspection the school was also judged to require improvement.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:  improve the quality of pupils’ written work by ensuring that it is always neatly presented and that handwriting is of a good quality  improve teaching by exploiting all opportunities to share the best practice of the school’s good and outstanding teachers  improve the action plan by making the links to the key actions from the previous inspection fully explicit, and by ensuring that all milestones are measurable.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you and other senior leaders, representatives of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com evaluated and you took me on a tour of the school. I checked the school’s single central register.

p.1

Context

At the time of the last inspection, a number of staff, including the deputy headteacher, were employed on fixed-term contracts for the autumn term. These contracts have now ended and the staff have left the school. A teacher on a permanent contract also left the school at the end of last term. Two classes are currently being taught by temporary staff. A new deputy headteacher has been appointed, from within the existing staff, on a fixed-term contract until the end of the academic year. You have reorganised classes to reduce the amount of mixed- age teaching.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s action plan is thorough and clear. It includes appropriate milestones, individual responsibilities are identified and success criteria are included. Some of the milestones and success criteria in the plan are measurable. A separate plan provides details of how the actions will be monitored and evaluated. All of the school’s senior leaders worked together to write the plan and it is clear that this has given the team a strong sense of ‘ownership’ of it. The action plan has been shared widely and is a working document that is constantly referred to and updated. You issued business cards – detailing the school’s current priorities on one side and strengths on the other – to all staff and governors and this has ensured that everyone knows exactly what the school is working to achieve.

p.2

Main findings

Although the plan covers all of the key actions arising from the last inspection, you chose not to match precisely the priority areas in your plan with the key actions in the report. This means that it is not immediately obvious how and when each key action is to be covered. Although the school is easily able to monitor progress against the priorities it has identified, it is less easy to do the same for the key inspection actions.

p.2

Main findings

At the time of the last inspection the school had a number of mixed-age classes, with some pupils taught in classes that were too small to be viable in the long term. You reorganised classes so that pupils are taught in their year groups, wherever possible, and you have already noticed that expectations are higher as a result of this change.

p.2

Main findings

A new system to track pupils’ attitudes and achievement had recently been introduced when the school was last inspected. You showed me the detailed feedback system that the school now uses to ensure that every pupil’s progress is tracked closely and that measures are put in place to address promptly any issues that are identified. You told me that parents are also more engaged with their children’s learning now that the system is increasingly embedded. The school’s behaviour policy has been revised and is closely linked to the new monitoring system. The expectations and consequences of the behaviour system are clear and pupils are keen to ‘stay green’ (showing that they follow the school rules) on the school’s traffic light system. The impact of the new system is clear; 80% of pupils were ‘green’ throughout the first half term and this rose to 90% by the end of December.

p.2

Main findings

You have increased the school’s focus on improving the quality of teaching through, for example, more focussed professional development meetings, increased use of coaching and raising expectations. You told me that the quality of teaching is improving and the school’s local authority adviser agrees. However, the quality of work in pupils’ books remains inconsistent across classes and year groups. Although progress is usually clearly evident, in some classes work is untidy and handwriting is not good enough.

p.3

Main findings

The governing body is supportive, well-informed and increasingly able to hold the school to account. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium has not yet taken place despite the school’s best efforts to arrange this. The governing body is well aware that the results of this year’s national tests are crucial and they know that they need to monitor progress closely and ensure that momentum – in terms of rapid school improvement – is maintained.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority provides good support for the school. The school’s standards and excellence adviser provides you with regular support and this is something that you value enormously. The school buys into the local authority’s ‘enhanced package’ and this enables staff to access a range of training courses, as appropriate. As you joined the school as a new headteacher, the local authority arranged a mentor for you.

p.3

External support

The school has made repeated attempts to arrange an external review of its use of the pupil premium, via the local authority, but without success. The local authority now needs to support the school to ensure that the review takes place as soon as possible.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Suffolk County Council.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion