Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Feb 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marianne Young

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marianne Young

  • Postcode verified

    S12 2EJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousvery higheffectiveimprovedsuccessfulclearimprovingaccurate
Criticismlacktoo oftennot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
755
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Vanessa Langley Executive Headteacher Gleadless Primary School Hollinsend Road Sheffield South Yorkshire S12 2EJ

p.1

School, Sheffield

Following my visit to your school on 19 January 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Sheffield

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. At its previous section 5 inspection the school was also judged to require improvement.

p.1

School, Sheffield

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School, Sheffield

 ensure that any new whole school initiatives start in the Early Years classes  check regularly and consider if the targets set for pupils in Year 6 particularly are, while remaining ambitious, realistically achievable  ensure that feedback to teachers, following lesson observations. makes it clear how much progress different groups of pupils make. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566863 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email : jbennett@cfbt.com

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection I held meetings with you, the Chair and vice-chair of the Governing Body together with other members of the senior leadership team. I also met with members of staff who monitor attendance, four phase leaders and a representative of the local authority. During these meetings we discussed the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. We toured the school to observe pupils in class and at lunchtime.

p.2

Context

Since the inspection the Chair of the Governing Body has stepped down but remains a governor. The current Chair was previously chair of a sub-committee.

p.2

Main findings

The determination, drive and rigour that you demonstrate was recognised in the inspection report and is reflected in the work led by other senior leaders and governors. The inspection in September 2014 identified issues that you were tackling, for example improving the quality of teaching and the progress being made by different groups of pupils. You recognise that progress in mathematics, although much improved, is not as strong as that in reading and writing. Links with other schools to ensure that more-able pupils in particular do as well as they can are proving successful, according to school data.

p.2

Main findings

During our discussions, the phrase ‘a lack of ambition’ was used on several occasions. Staff are now aware of individual pupils’ capabilities and are generally setting work that meets their needs. This needs to become fully embedded throughout the school. When observations take place, feedback to teachers must focus on the progress made, or not made, by different groups of pupils. Currently feedback, too often, describes what actions were taken by the teacher.

p.2

Main findings

Your action plans are comprehensive, checked by governors and reviewed regularly. Phase leaders contribute to these plans and are given responsibility to drive forward improvements. Some targets, for example the proportion of Year 6 pupils that are expected to make more than expected progress are very high. There is a large gap between where the pupils are now and the ambitious targets set for the end of the school year. You recognise the need to review these to ensure they are realistic given pupils’ starting points. A spelling programme has been introduced which currently starts in Year 1. You and your colleagues recognise that if children in Reception are ready, they should be involved.

p.2

Main findings

I may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

Working with Arbouthorne Community Primary School particularly and other schools in the area is beneficial and enables you and your staff to be sure that judgements and supporting evidence about pupils’ work are accurate. The links with a local secondary school to provide additional mathematical help for more able pupils is proving beneficial. Local authority officers check regularly to make sure that you continue to consolidate actions and that these lead to all pupils making the progress of which they are capable.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Sheffield.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion