Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Feb 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Charles Lowry

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Charles Lowry

  • Postcode verified

    M4 5HF

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−1Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivevery welleffectivelysafehigh qualityeffectivesecureconsistently
Criticismpoorseriouslyfailpersistently absentconcernabsenceyet toharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1185w+2
  • What needs to improve145w−25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,326
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Mr D Savage St Patrick’s RC Primary School Livesey Street Collyhurst Manchester M4 5HF

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 15 January 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and the time you took to discuss behaviour in your school.

p.1

School

The inspection was a monitoring inspection carried out in accordance with the no formal designation procedures and conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was carried out because the Chief Inspector was concerned about behaviour at the school.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I considered a number of sources of evidence including:

p.1

Evidence

 observations of pupils’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning in lessons  observations of pupils’ behaviour throughout the day, including discussion with pupils  documentary evidence  discussions with school leaders and staff.

p.1

Evidence

Having evaluated all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

Leaders and managers have taken effective action to improve behaviour and secure consistently positive attitudes to learning.

p.1

Context

St Patrick’s is an average-sized primary school with a total of 244 pupils on roll. More girls than boys attend the school. The proportion of pupils from ethnic minority backgrounds is over twice the national average and just under half of all pupils speak English as an additional language. About two-thirds of the pupil population are CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566857 Direct F 01695 729320 jkinsman@cfbt.com known to be eligible for free school meals, which is well above the national average. The numbers of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, including those with a statement of special educational needs, are well above average. Above average proportions of pupils start or leave the school other than at the usual times. Consequently, pupil mobility is high when compared to the average

p.1

Context

for other primary schools, nationally. Since the previous inspection, there have been a number of staff changes. Four teachers joined the staff in September 2014. However, one of those teachers, who held the position of deputy headteacher, has since left the school. The school has embraced the apprenticeship scheme and is involved in training six young people to become teaching assistants, under the auspices of Aspire Education Academy, Bury. Four teaching assistants have been appointed to various roles in the school. The governors have experienced little difficulty in appointing suitable professionals and have not been afraid to cast their net wide when recruiting. This influx of new people has refreshed an otherwise stable and experienced staff team.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils’ attitudes, in general, are positive. They conduct themselves well, wear their uniform with pride and treat their learning environment with respect. This is evidenced by a site that is litter and graffiti free and well-maintained, high quality wall displays.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

In all the lessons visited I saw pupils getting on with their work and trying their best. Pupils respond quickly to teachers’ instructions and follow well-rehearsed classroom routines. As a result, transitions from one task to the next are both smooth and rapid and little learning time is lost as pupils move between activities. In those books that I had an opportunity to scrutinise there is clear evidence that pupils take pride in their work, which is neatly presented, complete and up-to-date.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Relationships between pupils and the adults who work with them are characterised by warmth and mutual respect. Wall displays in classrooms and on corridors provide ever present reminders to pupils about the ‘golden rules’, which encapsulate the school’s expectations for pupils’ behaviour and conduct.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils are very well supervised by staff during periods of recreation. This level of supervision contributes effectively to keeping pupils safe and secure. Governors’ investment in playground equipment is ensuring that pupils have opportunities to participate in a variety of games and activities at break and lunchtime. These activities contribute well to pupils’ social development and their sense of fair play. The provision of two ‘buddy benches’ in the playground provides a place to sit for pupils who are feeling vulnerable. If pupils see anyone sitting on these benches then they approach them to offer support, including inviting them to join in a game. As one pupil told me, ‘these benches make sure that no one is left out.’

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils follow well-established routines at the end of playtimes. Assisted by members of staff, they tidy away quickly and line up in silence ready to go back into class. Consequently, pupils are calmed, made ready for learning and lessons start punctually.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Senior leaders keep a close eye on pupils’ behaviour. Incidents of poor behaviour are carefully logged and analysed. This has enabled you and your colleagues to identify patterns of poor behaviour and those individuals whose behaviour frequently gives cause for concern. One outcome of this analysis has been the inception of the ‘Rainbow Room’. This is a lunchtime facility, staffed by dedicated personnel who work with pupils who display challenging behaviours. Although the Rainbow Room has only been in place for a relatively short time you have compelling evidence of the positive impact that it is having on behaviour. One pupil who has received support as a member of the Rainbow Room said, ‘I’ve been helped to control my anger and it’s much better now.’

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Those pupils that I spoke with during the visit could demonstrate their understanding of the different forms that bullying can take but said that bullying at St Patrick’s was not a problem. Nevertheless, a number of pupils cited examples where a few members of their peer group had displayed challenging behaviours and sometimes struggled with relationships. However, there was general agreement among pupils that when this does occur the school staff take incidents seriously and tackle them effectively.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of pupils

When asked, pupils could describe the benefits and dangers of using the internet; with lessons and assemblies developing their understanding of how to stay safe on- line.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils’ rates of attendance are showing a slight improvement compared to what they were last year; nevertheless they still remain below average. Strategies to manage attendance, with the expressed aim of reducing absence, have been introduced. These include, telephone calls to parents should their child fail to register and home visits to those parents whose children are persistently absent. However, these mechanisms have yet to have sufficient impact and strategies for dealing with persistent absentees are not sharp enough.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of pupils

New teachers undergo an induction programme prior to starting at St Patrick’s in order to introduce to them to the way the school operates, for example, the school’s approach to behaviour. However, this induction programme does not extend to support staff and, as a result, they have to learn ‘on the job’. Consequently, early in their tenure this can lead to misunderstandings about what is acceptable behaviour from pupils and a few pupils testing boundaries.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Senior leaders and governors take their responsibility for keeping children safe seriously. Currently, all staff are expected to complete on-line safeguarding training. This is in order to update staff on current legislation and clarify each individual’s role in making sure that pupils are kept free from harm. However, as yet there is no clear mechanism in place to evaluate the quality of this training.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Sharpen the school’s approach to dealing with the families of those pupils who are persistently absent, making sure that pupils’ absence is rigorously followed up and the importance of regular attendance emphasised.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure that all staff new to the school or who are changing responsibilities are given a comprehensive induction, enabling them to settle into their new roles and find their feet quickly.  Ensure that senior leaders rigorously follow up staff training on safeguarding to make sure that all staff have a common understanding of their roles and responsibilities in this aspect of keeping children safe.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Director of Children’s Services for Manchester, the Secretary of State for Education, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Education for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Salford. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion