Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Feb 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clare Cossor

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clare Cossor

  • Postcode verified

    SK17 9LP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveclearrigorouspositiveclearly
Criticismnot clearlackinsufficientlyabsencenot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Mrs Amanda Nuttall Acting Headteacher Harpur Hill Primary School Trent Avenue Harpur Hill Buxton SK17 9LP

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 23 January 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 implement a rigorous system of performance management which holds those people responsible to account for agreed actions

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, with other senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. I observed lessons with the acting headteacher, spoke with a group of pupils and looked at work in pupils’ books. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9153 Direct email : naik.sandhu@serco.com

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection the headteacher has had a period of absence from the school and the deputy headteacher has been acting headteacher since November 2014. The local authority arranged for a headteacher from a neighbouring primary school to support the leadership team for two days a week from the January 2015. The major building work at the school is nearing completion.

p.2

Main findings

You, and your senior leaders and governors have worked hard to provide the school with a clear sense of direction and have ensured that the absence of the headteacher has not detracted from the focus of making essential improvements in the school. As a result, the areas identified at the time of the last inspection, are beginning to be addressed.

p.2

Main findings

The new school development plan identifies the key actions needed to bring about the required improvements in the school. However, the actions lack precision and it is not clear enough about when specific actions will be completed. It is not linked closely enough to the school’s cycle for assessment and monitoring to ensure that all teachers are clear about what is expected of them.

p.2

Main findings

You have revised the school’s marking policy and introduced a new reading policy. You have ensured that all staff have been involved in the development of these policies and there is evidence that there is already a greater degree of consistency in better quality marking. Pupils talked to me about the new marking code and said that the key reminders that are now on display are helping them to remember how teachers expect them to present their work. Pupils clearly feel that more is being expected of them and are enjoying a greater sense of challenge.

p.2

Main findings

The new intervention groups for reading are already having a positive impact on helping pupils at all levels of ability, to make faster progress. Pupils say how much they like these groups and the school’s own data show that pupils are achieving higher levels of skill and fluency in reading than before.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last inspection, the early years leader has become established in her role and is starting to bring about improvements to the quality of teaching and learning in this part of the school. As a result, children’s involvement and concentration in mathematical and writing activities is increasing. A new recording system to track children’s achievement is now in place. However, the system is insufficiently developed because leaders and members of the team are not clear about what individual children need to learn next.

p.2

Main findings

The Chair of the Governing Body has quickly become established and is leading the governing body with insight and skill. Governors now have a clear view of what the school needs to do next. They are not afraid to challenge leaders and to hold them to account. The governing body has made decisions about the specific curriculum and leadership responsibilities for individual governors but these roles are not yet embedded.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority has provided effective support to the school since the last inspection. For example, an early years consultant has supported the early years leader to review the organisation of teaching and learning in the Reception classes. The local authority has also brokered the support of a headteacher from another school to work in partnership with the acting headteacher. The local authority’s on- going work with governors is helping to ensure that the pace of improvement in school is rapid and that the new culture of increased accountability is sustained.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Derbyshire.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board  Local authority – including where the school is an academy

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion