Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Dixons Kings Academy
Summary
Mary Lanovy Taylor (lead), Henry Moreton, Stephen Wall
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Dec 2014
- Inspectors verified
Henry Moreton, Mary Lanovy Taylor, Stephen Wall
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BD7 2AN
- Name on report verified
Kings Science Academy
- URN verified
137277
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Actions taken to address the areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection are relatively recent. p.1
- Too little was done to address the areas for improvement robustly in the twelve months following that inspection. p.1
- The quality of teaching is inconsistent. p.1
- Assessment data are not always used to plan work that is well matched to students’ needs, especially boys with special educational needs. p.1
- The quality of marking and feedback is variable. p.1
- While the academy’s policy is sometimes followed well, on occasions appropriate feedback is not provided to help students take the next steps in their learning. p.1
- Behaviour is improving, but occasional misbehaviour in lessons persists. p.1
- Recently, the collection and analysis of progress data have improved markedly and the academy is now aware of the progress of all students; however, the academy’s knowledge of progress of groups over time, including the current Year 10, is limited. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,443
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Kings Science Academy Northside Road, Lidget Green, Bradford, BD7 2AN
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
Actions taken to address the areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection are relatively recent. Too little was done to address the areas for improvement robustly in the twelve months following that inspection. The quality of teaching is inconsistent. Assessment data are not always used to plan work that is well matched to students’ needs, especially boys with special educational needs. The quality of marking and feedback is variable. While the academy’s policy is sometimes followed well, on occasions appropriate feedback is not provided to help students take the next steps in their learning. Behaviour is improving, but occasional misbehaviour in lessons persists. Recently, the collection and analysis of progress data have improved markedly and the academy is now aware of the progress of all students; however, the academy’s knowledge of progress of groups over time, including the current Year 10, is limited.
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
Significantly improved structures and procedures, introduced by the new leadership team, have had insufficient time to demonstrate sustainable impact on the academy’s overall effectiveness. Over time, the curriculum has focused overly on English, mathematics and science at the expense of a richer educational experience for students. Recent improvements are a move in the right direction.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
Leadership at all levels is improving. The Executive Principal has driven the changes which are beginning to impact positively on the quality of teaching and students’ progress. Governors, led by a strong Chair, are supporting and challenging the academy well. Areas for improvement are now being tackled rigorously. Students’ behaviour during social times is good and they get on well together. They feel safe in school.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 32 parts of lessons, five jointly with senior leaders, and conducted two learning walks. One of the learning walks was to look at behaviour and the other to investigate the progress of the most able students. Visits were made to an assembly, morning tutor periods and to the enrichment period at the end of the day. Inspectors met with the Executive Principal, senior and middle leaders, a group of teachers and a representative of the Bradford Partnership. (The Bradford Partnership is a not-for-profit organisation, owned by its member schools to support schools to deliver the best outcomes for children, young people and their communities.) The lead inspector held a telephone conversation with the Chair of the Governing Body. Inspectors also spoke to three groups of students formally and to others during lessons and social times. Inspectors scrutinised a wide range of documents including the academy’s view of how well it is doing, its
p.2
Information about this inspection
development plan, evidence about the work of the governing body, data showing students’ progress, records of students’ behaviour and attendance and documents related to safeguarding. Inspectors took account of the 33 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire (Parent View) and those of a very small number of parents who shared their views in writing.
p.2
Inspection team
Helen Lane, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
Kings Science Academy opened as a free school in September 2011. At the time of this inspection, only Year 7, Year 8, Year 9 and Year 10 were on roll. The academy is smaller than the average-sized secondary school. The vast majority of students are of Pakistani heritage. The proportion of students with English as an additional language is above average. The proportion of disadvantaged students (those supported by the pupil premium) is above average. The pupil premium is additional funding for students who are known to be eligible for free school meals and those who are looked after by the local authority. The proportion of disabled students and those with special educational needs is below average. No students are educated off-site. In April 2014, the headteacher of Immanuel College in Bradford became the Executive Principal of the academy. Plans are in place for the academy to join the Dixons Academies Charitable Trust in January 2015.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching so that it is consistently good and students make good or better progress in all subjects and in all year groups by: using assessment data more effectively to plan activities which match students’ needs and abilities sharing the good practice which exists in teaching and learning as well as in marking and feedback ensuring no time is wasted at the end of lessons.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Tackle the instances of low-level disruption to learning in a small number of lessons.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that leaders and managers at all levels: continue to monitor rigorously the progress of Year 10 students until they complete Key Stage 4 check on the impact on students’ achievement of recent changes to the taught curriculum.
p.3
The leadership and management require improvement
The Executive Principal has provided outstanding leadership and direction for the academy during a time of considerable change. Staff say they value her leadership and the opportunities to learn from her effective practice. She has introduced systems and procedures, supported by an improvement plan, which are having a positive impact on the organisation of all areas in the academy. It is too soon to see a sustained impact; however, there are improvements in the progress made by students across the academy. All the senior leaders are highly focused and taking responsibility for driving improvement in their areas. As the Executive Principal says, ‘They have stepped up to the plate.’ The leadership of teaching, achievement and the curriculum is having a discernible impact on the quality of teaching. Effective monitoring and evaluation through learning walks, lesson observations, scrutiny of students’ work and review of data about students’ progress mean that leaders have a clear picture of the
p.4
The leadership and management require improvement
quality of teaching. High-quality professional development opportunities and support plans for those whose practice is not yet good are resulting in clear improvements in teaching. However, improvements in the quality of teaching, marking and feedback are not consistent across the academy. A new, much more robust, performance management system has been put into place which is linked strongly to the quality of teaching and students’ progress. It is too soon to measure the impact of this. Middle leadership is improving. Middle leaders have been empowered by professional development opportunities. They are growing in confidence in monitoring and evaluating their faculties and holding teachers to account for students’ progress. The Bradford Partnership has provided effective support during a challenging period, acting quickly to establish stable leadership for the academy. The Executive Principal has involved some of the senior
p.4
The leadership and management require improvement
leaders from Immanuel College in the leadership of the academy. These leaders are adding capacity in role modelling effective leadership. Other schools and academies in the Bradford Partnership are contributing by providing curriculum materials, resources and other support which has improved the accuracy of assessment. Recent changes mean the curriculum is now offering increased choice of qualifications and courses at Key Stage 4, matched more closely to students’ needs, aspirations and abilities. Religious education lessons and the ‘Character Citizenship’ curriculum delivered in tutor time are beginning to contribute to students’ understanding of the structure and diversity of modern Britain. The academy has worked hard to develop the quality of advice given to students about their future education and careers. ‘Compulsory enrichment’ activities take place twice weekly. The academy day is very long on the days
p.4
The leadership and management require improvement
when enrichment takes place and students do not always enjoy their additional activities, although they do offer opportunities for extra literacy and numeracy practice and for extra help with GCSE courses. The academy meets requirements for safeguarding and for ensuring equality of opportunity.
p.4
The leadership and management require improvement
The governance of the school: Governance arrangements are much improved since the previous inspection. The Chair of the Governing Body has worked tirelessly to ensure appropriate safeguarding and financial structures. He works closely with the Executive Principal to support the drive for improvement. Governors have an appropriate range of skills, particularly in finance and education. Governors have a detailed understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in the academy and hold senior and middle leaders to account with challenging questions. They check students’ progress rigorously, including the impact of pupil premium spending. The gap in progress between students in receipt of the pupil premium and others is very small and well below that seen nationally. The new performance management policy makes very clear the criteria for teachers’ pay awards and the quality of teaching is now carefully monitored by the governing body.
p.4
The leadership and management require improvement
Governors have carried out their statutory duty for safeguarding through a partnership with the local authority human resources department. Recruitment and checks on new staff are now very rigorous. Financial management is transparent and accountable. The budget is balanced.
p.4
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Students and staff recognise behaviour is improving, but students told inspectors that sometimes their learning was disrupted by a small minority of their peers. This was supported by observations made during the inspection. Of the very small proportion of the parents who responded to Parent View, some expressed a concern about behaviour. Disruption in lessons is linked to the quality of teaching. In lessons where the work challenges the students and they are motivated to do well, students behave very well and are keen to learn. Where the needs of students, particularly of boys who have special educational needs, are not met, behaviour deteriorates. Students’ attitudes to learning vary but are improving. During the inspection, outstanding attitudes to learning were seen in some classrooms, which had a strong impact on learning. However, in others,
p.5
Behaviour
attitudes are not as positive and progress is not as good. Students say they respect each other and the staff, no matter what their role. Year 7 students say the older students have respected them from their start at the academy. Students look smart and are proud of their uniform. Fixed-period exclusions have reduced. Behaviour logs suggest an increase in behaviour incidents; however, this is likely to be a result of much-improved recording systems. The middle leaders say the type of incidents now recorded reflects the real drive for better behaviour, and behaviour is improving rapidly.
p.5
Safety
The academy’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Attendance has improved. When students are not attending, it is used as an indicator of a concern. There are robust systems in place to address concerns about the welfare of students. Students say they feel safe in the academy and there is very little bullying or racism. They are confident any concerns they might have would be dealt with quickly by adults in whom they can confide. Students also value the prefects who are role models and help them with problems. Students understand different types of bullying, including homophobic bullying and cyber-bullying. Some students are not punctual to morning tutor time. Students are generally punctual to lessons.
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Actions taken to improve the quality of teaching are resulting in strengthening practice in classrooms that is benefiting students, but the quality of teaching over time has not been consistently strong enough to ensure all students make good progress. The impact of better teaching in English and mathematics can be seen in the data provided by the academy, which shows the progress in these subjects to be variable but improving. In some year groups, progress is good, for example in Years 9 and 10; in others, it still requires improvement. Work on literacy across the curriculum is further forward than that in numeracy, with students regularly reading and using the ‘word of the week’ in tutor time. A reading programme funded by the Year 7 catch-up funding is boosting the attainment of less-able students in Year 7. Marking and feedback have improved. Teachers mark students’ written work regularly and many make
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
helpful comments which show students how to improve their work. For example, consistently high-quality marking in English is helping to accelerate students’ progress. However, this is not the case in all subjects. Teachers are becoming more adept at using data about students’ progress and abilities to match activities to their needs; teachers have a better understanding of the need to drive progress at a faster rate. However, this is at an early stage and the effectiveness in the use of data is still variable, to support boys with special educational needs for example. Students learn quickly when activities are closely matched to their abilities and needs. For example, in a Year 8 religious education lesson about discrimination, exceptionally challenging teaching elicited very thoughtful responses that reflected the rapid progress the students were making in their understanding and knowledge. In some classes, activities are not well matched to students’ needs and this slows the
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
progress they make. The impact of teaching assistants is improving. Appropriate training ensures they provide increasingly effective support, for example in improving pupils’ reading skills in Year 7 and in providing in-class support for identified pupils. Relationships between students and their teachers are usually strong, giving students the enthusiasm to do their best. However, on occasion, teachers are not quick enough to tackle students who are chatting and off task. This slows progress. In some classes, students are allowed to stop working too early and spend too long packing away. This limits the amount of learning in the lesson. Appropriate homework is set in some subjects but this is variable.
p.5
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Judgements about the achievement of students are based on observations of progress over time in lessons and on the academy’s own data. No students have yet completed their GCSE courses. As a result, there is no direct comparison with national data at Key Stage 4. The academy’s data which monitor students’ progress have been made more rigorous as a result of new, well-monitored assessment procedures. The data are starting to be used effectively by teachers to monitor the progress of individual students in their classes and to identify appropriate support for those who are making insufficient progress. It is too early to see the impact of this, but leaders have a sound understanding of where progress is good and where it requires improvement. Data show good progress is not consistent in all subjects and in all year groups, and this is supported by what was observed in lessons during the inspection. However, in some classes observed, progress since September is good or
p.6
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
outstanding. Outstanding progress was seen in observations of English and religious education. Early data demonstrate that extra classes and one-to-one support are impacting positively on the progress of Year 10 students. In the last school year, Year 7 students who were involved in a reading programme improved by one National Curriculum level in one year. Academy data suggest the proportion of the current Year 10 working towards attaining five GCSE grades A* to C including English and mathematics is above the national average for 2014. The majority of Year 10 students are currently making expected progress in English and mathematics. A greater proportion of students are making more-than-expected progress in English than in mathematics. The gap between the performance of disadvantaged students and non-disadvantaged students is negligible in all year groups. In Year 7, disadvantaged students are making better progress in mathematics than their peers.
p.6
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Visits to lessons where the most able were being taught, and a review of the work in their books, showed high expectations and strong challenge. For example, Year 10 students were competently solving quadratic equations and Year 8 students had written lengthy pieces of work in Spanish. In the lessons observed, the most able students had made very good progress since September. Prior to the new leadership in the academy, provision for disabled students and those who have special educational needs was patchy. This is now improving. The progress of disabled students and those who have special educational needs is variable. Although some make good progress, the variations in the quality of teaching and support mean that it requires improvement overall.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 137277 Local authority Bradford Inspection number 442300
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Secondary School category Academy free school Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 708 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair John Bowers Executive Principal Jane Tiller Date of previous school inspection 12 February 2013 Telephone number 01274 449706 Fax number 01274 925471 Email address sjt@kings.ac guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion