Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Jan 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Daniell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Daniell

  • Postcode verified

    AL4 0TZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedfall behind
Criticismweakerbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
809
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

David Allen Headteacher The Links AP Academy 1 Hixberry Lane St Albans AL4 0TZ

p.1

Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 14 January 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

Academy

 ensure that the improvement plan identifies regular times during the year when progress towards achieving your targets can be measured  continue to strengthen the subject knowledge of teachers and appoint new staff with the necessary skills and expertise.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you and other senior leaders, groups of students and the Chair and two other members of the Governing Body. I held a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority who is providing additional support. I also evaluated the academy improvement plan. We visited every class briefly to observe students’ learning and to look at the work in their books. I also scrutinised the academy’s records of recruitment checks on staff. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, two learning assistants have left the academy. The academy no longer has a budget deficit.

p.2

Main findings

Your academy improvement plan is detailed and rightly focuses on areas which aim to make the academy good at the time of its re-inspection. Many of your targets are measurable, but the plan would benefit from the identification of more frequent times during the year when progress made towards reaching these targets can be reviewed.

p.2

Main findings

As a result of a formal timetable for the whole academic year, pupils now have much more consistency in the quality of teaching they receive. They appreciate the stability of knowing who their teacher will be throughout the year. This includes opportunities for students in Years 10 and 11 to do work experience in order to be better prepared for the world of work. You have also appointed more qualified teachers, and are measuring students’ progress more regularly. This allows you to offer additional support where needed so that students do not fall behind.

p.2

Main findings

You use a range of monitoring activities to judge the quality of teaching over time including observations of lessons, scrutiny of students’ books and regular analyses of students’ progress. Teachers’ marking of students’ work is detailed, but few students currently respond in writing to their teachers’ guidance.

p.2

Main findings

Students’ attendance has improved since the previous inspection, and although it compares favourably with many students’ attendance at their previous school, it remains well below the national average. Some students continue to present challenging behaviour in lessons, but staff make use of effective strategies to tackle this. Consequently, the proportion of students who are excluded from the academy has been reduced. You have forged good working relationships with other support agencies, including the local police.

p.2

Main findings

Members of the governing body monitor the academy’s work closely. The Academy Improvement Committee, which meets every six weeks, holds leaders and managers to account for progress made against targets in the action plan when they are identified. Governors rightly believe there is greater consistency in the academy because there are now established systems and procedures for leading and managing the academy. You acknowledge the need to only appoint permanent staff who possess the necessary skills and expertise so that you can drive improvement as quickly as possible.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

You have brokered support from the local authority to monitor, review and evaluate the work of the academy. This support has been helpful in driving improvement. You have received valuable support from other schools in the Alban Schools Teaching Alliance. Colleagues from these mainstream schools have worked well with your staff to develop the quality of teaching and share good practice, often by hosting your teachers in their schools. This is helping to tackle teachers’ weaker subject knowledge.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire and the Education Funding Agency.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following Chair of the Governing Body Local authority CausingConcern.SCHOOLS@education.gsi.gov.uk

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion