Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Jan 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Evans

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Evans

  • Postcode verified

    NE11 0AN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+64Positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingvery wellno concernswell behavedenjoyconcernssafeclearly
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings725w+63
  • What needs to improve68w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
793
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Mr Jonathan Winch Principal Emmanuel College Consett Road Lobley Hill Gateshead Tyne and Wear NE11 0AN

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Emmanuel College

Following my visit with Her Majesty’s Inspectors Jan Bennett, Helen Lane, Helen Storey and Chris Smith to your school on 26 and 27 November 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Emmanuel College

This inspection was undertaken at the direction of the Secretary of State for Education. Under s8(1) of the Education Act 2005 the Chief Inspector, if requested by the Secretary of State to inspect a school, must inspect and report on that school.

p.1

Evidence

Her Majesty’s Inspectors scrutinised the single central record and other documents relating to safeguarding and child protection arrangements and met with the Principal, groups of pupils, college staff and the Chair of the Governing Body. Inspectors also scrutinised a range of documentation including minutes of governing body meetings, attendance and exclusion records and the college’s own records about the quality of teaching. Inspectors also visited a range of lessons and scrutinised pupils’ work-books and folders.

p.1

Context

Emmanuel College is larger than the average-sized secondary school. The majority of pupils are of White British heritage with an average number of pupils from minority ethnic groups. An average proportion of pupils speak English as an additional language. The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs is below average. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils, eligible CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email : hcarnall@cfbt.com for support through the pupil premium funding, is below average. The pupil premium is additional funding for those pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals and those children who are looked after by the local authority. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum

p.1

Context

expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics. As a result of its status, the college works independently of the local authority.

p.2

Main findings

The inspectors’ main focus was to establish whether the school’s curriculum is suitably broad and balanced and whether leaders, including governors, ensure that pupils are adequately prepared for life in modern Britain. The inspection findings raised no concerns about either aspect of leadership and management. Inspectors did, however, identify areas of work where further improvement would strengthen the overall effectiveness of this outstanding college.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s curriculum is broad and balanced and prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain. Pupils are very well cared for and report that they know how to keep themselves safe, including when using the internet, because of the college’s work. Pupils are articulate and respond well, and often at length, to teachers’ questions, which challenge their assumptions and help them to think. They talk enthusiastically about their learning and are well behaved. The library is well stocked with a broad range of books and other materials that reflect a wide range of views and approaches to knowledge, understanding and belief.

p.2

Main findings

The school gives pupils a good range of opportunities to explore and reflect on the spiritual, moral, social and cultural aspects of their lives both within lessons and in the range of clubs and other activities the school offers. There are regular assemblies and the themes articulated in these assemblies are followed up in tutor times. There is an emphasis on service and many pupils report that they enjoy the opportunities they are given to take up leadership roles. However, the school does not have a fully integrated and clearly mapped out approach to this broader curriculum. As a result, the impact of these opportunities is not carefully coordinated and tracked to ensure that all pupils are benefiting as much as they could from this enriched provision.

p.2

Main findings

Achievement in the sixth form is high, with many students progressing to higher education. Teachers’ subject knowledge is very good and their focused questioning makes a valuable contribution to supporting learning. They check carefully for understanding and challenge students so that they do well.

p.2

External support

Emmanuel College is a member of the Emmanuel Schools Foundation, a group of four schools. The Principal of Emmanuel College is also Executive Principal within the Emmanuel Schools Foundation, working particularly closely with Bede Academy in Blyth.

p.2

Priority for further improvement

 Ensure through tracking and analysis that the personal development of all pupils is supported equally well though their choice of academic courses and uptake of enrichment activities offered through the curriculum.

p.3

Priority for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Director of Children’s Services for Gateshead, to the Secretary of State for Education and the Chair of the Governing Body. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion