Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Dec 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Drew Crawshaw

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Drew Crawshaw

  • Postcode verified

    OL16 2SU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+69Positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiverapid progressoutstandingmake good progressaccuratesuccessfullyeffectivelyimproving
Criticismnot yetnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,050
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Claire John Headteacher Springside Albert Royds Street Rochdale Manchester OL16 2SU

p.1

Rochdale

Following my visit to your school on 3 December 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Rochdale

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Rochdale

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Rochdale

 sharpen the action plan by giving specific detail about what success will look like, so that leaders can judge unambiguously the impact of their actions on improving the outcomes of all pupils in the school.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the acting headteacher, teachers, pupils, the Chair of Governors, a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. I took the opportunity to tour the school to observe learning. I also scrutinised samples of pupils’ work and records of pupils’ progress along with various other documents provided by the school. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Context

There have been no significant changes to the school since the last inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Without a doubt, the number one priority for leaders has been to raise the quality of teaching throughout the school in order to ensure all pupils are challenged, learn well and make good progress. Leaders have worked swiftly with the local authority to produce an improvement plan which gives an accurate overview of the actions required to address the main areas for improvement. However, the actions identified are not linked to clear statements on the intended impact on pupils’ outcomes. Consequently, leaders do not have well defined measures to judge success.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have successfully introduced a structured approach to the recording of teachers’ assessments of pupils’ progress. Teachers use their assessments of progress to set challenging learning targets in each pupil’s individual education plan. As a result teachers and leaders are able to evaluate effectively the learning of individual pupils on a lesson by lesson basis. Analysis of the school’s own data shows that pupils who were previously identified as underachieving, are now making better progress.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers make good use of their frequent assessment, along with pupils’ individual targets, to modify their planning of lessons. For example, one teacher increased the level of challenge in a reading lesson to move one pupil from reading individual words to matching sentences with pictures. This well-timed adjustment by the teacher resulted in rapid progress being made by this pupil.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders’ analysis of whole school assessment data indicates that there are early signs of improvement taking place across the school. For example the increased level of staff training in ‘Th.Ink’, a strategy designed to meet the needs of pupils who have specific social and emotional problems, has resulted in the rapid improvement of behaviour. The school’s own records show that there has been a drop in the number of recorded incidents compared with a similar period before the inspection. While it is too early to judge the full impact of improvements in behaviour on the quality of pupils’ learning. Anecdotal evidence gained from talking to adults and pupils indicates that pupils spend more time learning than they did before the inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders’ analysis of data has deepened since the inspection. For example adults have focussed recently on the listening aspect of communication following leaders’ detailed scrutiny of progress data. Subsequently, leaders have taken the bold action to raise the profile of ‘Narrative Therapy Intervention’ in order to boost basic skills across the school. Adults take every opportunity available to challenge pupils, especially those with severe disabilities, to communicate in a way that is appropriate to their needs. I observed pupils thoroughly enjoying soft play areas in both a classroom and a designated room; I observed three pupils responding appropriately to adults as the pupils moved over, in and through obstacles. I also observed three other pupils clearly using eye contact and facial expression to communicate both their joy at and desire for more contact by the adult. While the school’s collection of

p.2

Main findings

evidence is not yet complete, my scrutiny of the data available compared with leaders’ initial analysis shows the rate of progress in communication skills, has increased for the most disabled pupils.

p.3

Main findings

Governors have taken appropriate steps to ensure external reviews of governance and the school’s use of pupil premium funds take place in a timely manner. Governors have started to complete an audit of their skills and have set a date at which they will review their findings and plan next steps. The Chair of Governors is aware that swift action needs to be taken in order that all the required statutory reports are made available on the school’s website.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The school is being supported well by both the local authority and a number of other schools including that co-located with Springside. The local authority was instrumental in the secondment of the acting headteacher just prior to the inspection and continues to provide support both financially and through frequent involvement in the professional development of staff and governors and the monitoring of progress. The local authority is leading the review of governance and the review of the school’s use of the pupil premium grant. Leaders have made effective links with several other good and outstanding schools. As a result leaders’ initial assessments of pupils’ progress are accurate and provide a secure base from which to measure improvement.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Rochdale.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion